Cheryl Rixon discussion

[stereoscope]

Originally Posted by kaalpani

Does anyone else besides me doubt that this is Cheryl Rixon?


Mod note
Post moved to Cheryl Ain's thread

[otokonomidori]

Originally Posted by stereoscope

Does anyone else besides me doubt that this is Cheryl Rixon?

Yes, me - and everyone else that's ever seen a picture of the real Cheryl Rixon.

[stereoscope]

I think this model is actually Cheryl Ain, June 1977.

http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...&postcount=726

[bigtrain45]

These pictures being posted at "Filthy Gorgeous" have many questionable ID's. They are apparently Guccione's creditors, selling everything they can find, and they don't seem to care much if they get the model's names right or not.

[wgnrgeorg1958]

Did cheryl and her former band Rixon ,ever ,release a single as a band,and who has it that we can hear how good she sang.

[stacy0622]

I had emailed info@filthygorgeousmedia.com stating that they had a wrong id, and they were very appreciate for the update, and made the changes right away. They informed me that their CEO had purchased Bob Guccione's belonging and got all the imagery that was given to him and taken by him. They mainly go by the names on the boxes the slides were found in.

Good to know they actually care about what they put out.

[sidbulkhead]

NOT her

[bigtrain45]

I think I remember reading something about her Pet of the Year shoot, that Kodak refused to return one roll of the slides he shot because they were "Pornographic." Has anyone else heard that story or know anything about it? Thanks.

[keats]

Originally Posted by bigtrain45

I think I remember reading something about her Pet of the Year shoot, that Kodak refused to return one roll of the slides he shot because they were "Pornographic." Has anyone else heard that story or know anything about it? Thanks.

Given what I know about the industrial arm of Kodak this story is probably apocryphal; besides in that era they were probably using Ektachrome which would be processed in house. Most professional studios used Ektachrome for this sort of thing. Of course, Kodachrome was used too but not as much.

[thb53]

Originally Posted by bigtrain45

I think I remember reading something about her Pet of the Year shoot, that Kodak refused to return one roll of the slides he shot because they were "Pornographic." Has anyone else heard that story or know anything about it? Thanks.

The story is true. It was quite a news item back when it happened, Penthouse sued Kodak, but I believe the court decided in Kodak's favor. As I recall Kodak destroyed the film. As Kodak had been processing Penthouse film for a number of years, it makes one wonder how explicit the the images in question must have been.