Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum

Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Discussion & Talk Forum > Vintage Erotica Talk

Follow Vintage Erotica Forum on Twitter
Best Porn Sites Meet Our Girls Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices
Vintage Erotica Talk Talk about vintage erotica right here! Maximum date of the content allowed to be posted here is 1995.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-05-2016, 04:20 AM   #161
Joe Dimtwat
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 13 Times in 7 Posts
Joe Dimtwat 0
Default

Hey, anyone that thinks this might be Lynda.
LOOK at the boobs in Bobbi Jo and then look at that pic.
(Shakes head.....................)
Joe Dimtwat is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Joe Dimtwat For This Useful Post:
Old 12-25-2016, 11:06 PM   #162
Hellblazer
Senior Member
 
Hellblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 111
Thanks: 10
Thanked 4,875 Times in 110 Posts
Hellblazer 10000+Hellblazer 10000+Hellblazer 10000+Hellblazer 10000+Hellblazer 10000+Hellblazer 10000+Hellblazer 10000+Hellblazer 10000+Hellblazer 10000+Hellblazer 10000+Hellblazer 10000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tertium View Post
Little bit of postscript. We made wikipedia, entertainment weekly, and a bunch of other websites and blogs. At least our evidence did. It seems like it's becoming the prevalent view in the wider world that the photo is real. I feel like we solved a mystery.
Lynda Carter herself shared the Entertainment Weekly article. It's the best confirmation we're gonna get from her for now.



And this is what's in the article FYI

Quote:
3. She was supposed to be in Apocalypse Now, and she still kind of is if you know where to look

Francis Ford Coppola’s Apocalypse Now is one of the most acclaimed war movies ever made, and Carter originally had a part in it. Carter was cast as the Playboy Playmate “Miss May” in the film, but after production was delayed by a storm, her contract with Wonder Woman forced her to give up the role and actress Colleen Camp took her place. However, viewers still get a glimpse of Carter in the Redux version of the film that Coppola released in 2001. A Playboy centerfold shot for the movie while Carter was still on set appears in the lengthened version of the movie, and the photograph accounts for the actress’ only nude scene aside from the one she did in her very first movie, 1976’s Bobbie Jo and the Outlaw.
I'm 100% sure it's legit

1. The pics are clearly not the same. The claim could have fooled people back then but now It's clear there are many differences.

2. It's airbrushed only to the usual vintage Playboy extent. It's not a painted face and it would be clear if that was the case. And the body would be even more difficult to paint, so in that case it would be another model. I don't think someone would go to those lenghts to make a fake picture of her when the very fact that she was in the movie was not common knowledge.

3. It's not a collage either because there's no other picture of her like that, but it's clearly her.

4. Colleen Camp said Lynda did the centerfold.

5. It's confirmed she was in the movie and on the set of the scene with the soldiers.

6. It matches the scenes in Bobbie Jo perfectly.

If anyone needs more proof beyond that, only confirmation from her or Coppola would suffice.
Hellblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Hellblazer For This Useful Post:
Old 01-10-2017, 03:11 AM   #163
comet52
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 4
Thanks: 2
Thanked 21 Times in 4 Posts
comet52 100+comet52 100+
Default

I'd like to think it's Lynda, it seems plausible. But Lynda's most striking feature to me is her gorgeous blue eyes. And this picture is a woman with brown or hazel eyes.
comet52 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to comet52 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-10-2017, 06:55 AM   #164
Rubinski
Moderator
 
Rubinski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In profile
Posts: 1,859
Thanks: 12,626
Thanked 42,079 Times in 1,813 Posts
Rubinski 175000+Rubinski 175000+Rubinski 175000+Rubinski 175000+Rubinski 175000+Rubinski 175000+Rubinski 175000+Rubinski 175000+Rubinski 175000+Rubinski 175000+Rubinski 175000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by comet52 View Post
I'd like to think it's Lynda, it seems plausible. But Lynda's most striking feature to me is her gorgeous blue eyes. And this picture is a woman with brown or hazel eyes.
In 9 years of discussion here, no one has ever said it wasn't Lynda's face.
Are you trying to say it isn't Lynda because of the eye color?
Eye color is one thing that is easily changed on a photo.

What is so unbelievable about the photo?
Just because she changed her career path with Wonder Woman doesn't mean she never had her breasts photographed.
She had just done a movie with at least 2 topless scenes.
Why is so hard to believe that she would show them again in her next movie?
Especially in an A+ production with an A+ director.
Any starlet would have been extremely motivated to do whatever Francis wanted.

There is proof Lynda was originally in the movie, and was in the Philippines with them.
She was cast as one of the playmates, and all three of the playmate roles had topless scenes in the movie, and all did centerfolds.
So she would have signed on to do a topless scene in the movie, and the centerfold, or she wouldn't have been there at all.
The playmate photos would have been one of the first things the girls did in the production.
Definitely before the location shooting, which they had started.
Then the monsoon struck and delayed the production.
Then she got the Wonder Woman part, and quit the movie.

We still have no solid reason to believe the photo is fake.
It certainly is not Lynda's face pasted on that Colleen Camp photo.

I still firmly believe it is Lynda. Face and body. Totally Lynda.
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Help us ID an unknown model
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.
Or find a name for your favorite unknown model
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
.
Before you make any posts or requests, check out the rules

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
-
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


Have Fun, and Long Live VEF!
Rubinski is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Rubinski For This Useful Post:
Old 01-10-2017, 09:38 PM   #165
cginok
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 103
Thanks: 15
Thanked 770 Times in 96 Posts
cginok 2500+cginok 2500+cginok 2500+cginok 2500+cginok 2500+cginok 2500+cginok 2500+cginok 2500+cginok 2500+cginok 2500+cginok 2500+
Default

The eye color of people with blue eyes does change, to some extent, depending on lighting and what they are wearing. People have blue eyes because they have a low amount of melanin, which is a naturally occurring pigment. People with blue eyes basically have little to no eye color. I know that sounds weird considering you see an eye color. The reason they have blue eyes is because their eyes are absorbing and reflecting light in the say wavelengths that our atmosphere does. So the same reason that the sky is blue is why some people have blue eyes.

What all that means is, changing the color of clothing worn, the color of their surroundings, even the ambient light, can change just how blue someone's eyes can appear.
cginok is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to cginok For This Useful Post:
Old 01-11-2017, 05:57 PM   #166
Hellblazer
Senior Member
 
Hellblazer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 111
Thanks: 10
Thanked 4,875 Times in 110 Posts
Hellblazer 10000+Hellblazer 10000+Hellblazer 10000+Hellblazer 10000+Hellblazer 10000+Hellblazer 10000+Hellblazer 10000+Hellblazer 10000+Hellblazer 10000+Hellblazer 10000+Hellblazer 10000+
Default

The picture has that brownish vintage look all around. Even the white of the eyes is kinda brownish. Her eyes are still very bright.

The same effect happens in this picture



Also, with Colleen's centerfold close in color tone and brightness to Lynda's centerfold, like in this pic, her blue eyes also look hazel.



If anything it's even more evidence that it's legit, IMO. Because if someone was to fake it, they would definitely make her eyes blue.

Last edited by Hellblazer; 01-11-2017 at 06:05 PM..
Hellblazer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Hellblazer For This Useful Post:
Old 01-11-2017, 08:43 PM   #167
mokojono
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 92
Thanks: 44
Thanked 365 Times in 75 Posts
mokojono 1000+mokojono 1000+mokojono 1000+mokojono 1000+mokojono 1000+mokojono 1000+mokojono 1000+mokojono 1000+mokojono 1000+mokojono 1000+mokojono 1000+
Default

They are obviously not the same picture at least. Too many differences to be photoshopped. The story that they both posed for the same composition is plausible.
mokojono is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mokojono For This Useful Post:
Old 01-11-2017, 09:47 PM   #168
pharoahegypt
Vintage Member
 
pharoahegypt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: On the Verge of Blowing
Posts: 3,351
Thanks: 8,019
Thanked 26,361 Times in 3,101 Posts
pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+pharoahegypt 100000+
Default

Wouldn't be the first time a photographer has drawn inspiration, or deliberately copied another shoot, for purely artistic reasons, or as part of a pre-planned subtle homage.

How many have copied just that classic 'Tennis Butt Shot' pose..?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
pharoahegypt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pharoahegypt For This Useful Post:
Old 01-22-2017, 07:58 PM   #169
carlor
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 4 Posts
carlor 0
Default There's no mystery here

Crikey! I canNOT believe this thread is still going. I debated this with the Fake Detective over 15 years ago, and can't believe it's so hard for people to understand.

First, you need to know the SOURCE of the Lynda Carter centrefold photo. It is NOT somehow captured from any film version of Apocalypse Now, but is a PUBLISHED photograph from around 1982. I think the magazine was called FLICKR. I bought it on a newsstand in Chicago. Flickr had no clue that they were in possession of a real Lynda Carter nude centrefold shot (or perhaps they were afraid of being sued?). Because they used the photo, together with Colleen Camp's photo, to illustrate an article on how, in the pre-digital age, it was possible for an artist, BY HAND, to repaint and fake a photo by substituting the head. The article, of course, failed to notice all the other discrepancies, as discussed in this thread. They had no clue that they actually were publishing two different centrefold photos of two gorgeous, but different, women. And when, a few years later, Playboy did a pictorial on Colleen Camp, Steven Chan discussed the fact that she had replaced Lynda Carter. I did not know that till then but had kept the magazine because I was a big Colleen Camp fan. (Still am, darling, if you're reading this). Then I checked the original print publication and saw all the discrepancies. And the mystery was solved. Both photos are published print photos: Colleen's is widely available in Playboy. Lynda's seems to be only available in digital copies taken from the originally published photograph.

It really isn't hard to understand.
carlor is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to carlor For This Useful Post:
Old 01-22-2017, 08:01 PM   #170
carlor
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 4 Posts
carlor 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mokojono View Post
They are obviously not the same picture at least. Too many differences to be photoshopped. The story that they both posed for the same composition is plausible.

Not only is it plausible, it is undisputed fact. We know the photographer, Steven Chan, who has discussed taking both photos in the edition of Playboy magazine that featured Colleen Camp.
carlor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 08:05 PM.






vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.1 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.