Does a male pornstar more boring than Peter North exist ? - Page 2

MaxJoker · February 4th, 2011, 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eek

On topic... I hope. Who's the fella in the picture?

Huh , i thought it was Peter North

Never look at porn you see

Goofball Jones · February 4th, 2011, 03:21 PM

I disagree. While I may be in the vast minority here on VEF, I don't view male pornstars as simply stunt-cocks or the "penis delivery system". The reason I enjoy classic porn is that there were stories and set-ups that gave context to the sex. I enjoy watching two people have sex.

The amount of contempt I've read on this board for all male actors is astonishing. Look at all the different threads of male bashing here. All you see is the attitude "I only wanna see them womenz". Certainly there is a plethora of lesbian and solo porn out there that you will never ever see a naked guys hairy ass again.

I mean, why watch a couple have sex if people loath the guy so much? I don't understand the psychology behind it. But perhaps that's why porn produced today is almost 90% gonzo...where it's just a bunch of guys using a girl. Rarely see the guy other than their cocks. SO much so that their bodies are off-camera and just this cock floating into the frame.

That's what we have now in today's porn and we have no one but ourselves to blame. To me gonzo isn't really porn or erotic...it's just a masturbation device guys use to get off.

But as I say, I'm in the minority. Smoking hot sex teamed with a nice set-up and story are going the way of the dodo. Now it's like you want a story, then it's very tame, "couples" films. Want smoking sex, then it's a bunch of guys using a young woman for the sake of doing it....all the while she has the look on her face of "where's my money".

MaxJoker · February 4th, 2011, 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goofball Jones

The amount of contempt I've read on this board for all male actors is astonishing.

Is it contempt or more a heavy helping of tongue in cheek ribbing

Although it could also be annoyance ,due to the fact those guys get to play launch the torpedo with a plethora of great looking women eventhough compared to us members their equipment is tiny

Erm not that i`d know of course

**blondifan** · February 4th, 2011, 03:57 PM

I recently watched "Patti Plenty's Gang Bang" and who should be there to welcome my other favorite porn star "Sweetie Pie" but "Tony Montana"

I mean i know the poor guys got AIDS, but wouldn't we all be better off if they had never let him out of prison?

Goofball Jones · February 5th, 2011, 06:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blondifan

I recently watched "Patti Plenty's Gang Bang" and who should be there to welcome my other favorite porn star "Sweetie Pie" but "Tony Montana"

I mean i know the poor guys got AIDS, but wouldn't we all be better off if they had never let him out of prison?

I hate this board sometimes. You get posts like this out of the blue to where I have no idea what you're talking about...and it's almost impossible to search for because "Tony Montana" gives me lots of links to Scarface, but not to the porn actor.

I found that he got HIV in 1999, but no where did I find anything about prison. Even searching here on VEF for "tony montana prison" brings up two posts by blondifan....this thread here and another thread where you say he went to prison. What did he go to prison for? Where did you find that info?

Thanks...my Google skills must be waining.

**blondifan** · February 5th, 2011, 06:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goofball Jones

I found that he got HIV in 1999, but no where did I find anything about prison. Even searching here on VEF for "tony montana prison" brings up two posts by blondifan....this thread here and another thread where you say he went to prison. What did he go to prison for? Where did you find that info?

Thanks...my Google skills must be waining.

If you try "Tony Montana Pornstar" you may get some result.
There are at least two pages relating to this.
There was another that is harder to find.

He did 27 months prison for his part in a kidnapping, around 1991, although as he states he was later cleared of all charges.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0598940/bio

Quote:

"I was in there for kidnapping. I was arrested for kidnapping, ransom. I used to hang out with the wrong people. I'll take the fifth on all that. I've been acquitted for everything I've been arrested for. I had a $20-million bail. I couldn't afford to get out so I had to stay in jail. How was I going to bail out at 20 million? I needed $200,000 plus $18 million in property. I didn't have any of that. I sat there for 27 months until I was proved not guilty".

On another, more recent site he claims this

Quote:

Crime does not f#cking pay.... It might pay for a little while, but it gets you at the end. In 1990 I got arrested and almost ended up in prison for the rest of my life, over a drug deal."

Other pages tend to go with the kidnapping story, which although perhaps more unbelievable, seems better documented.

Let him have the last word, from yet another account.

Quote:

"People. What have you heard? I was acquitted of everything I was charged with. Whether I did it or not, that’s not the point. I was not guilty."

Interviewer: "What were you charged with?"

Tony: "All kinds of things. International trafficking. Kidnapping for ransom, you name it. In 1990, I made the pages of the Valley News."

**palo5** · February 5th, 2011, 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goofball Jones

The amount of contempt I've read on this board for all male actors is astonishing. Look at all the different threads of male bashing here...

I have contempt for men who abuse women. That's my instinct and I won't hide it. Some of those knuckledraggers deserve 10 summers in a Siberian swamp without a mosquito net

(Peter North is not one of them, imho)

Btw, there are plenty of threads criticising female performers too -- check out implants, tattoos, spitting etc

nastypiece · February 5th, 2011, 11:16 AM

Mark "Limp-Dick" Davies totally rules in the boring sense. He beats Peter N in any way possible when comparing the non-existing thrill of a scene.

**Ace** · February 5th, 2011, 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by palo5

Completely agree. I've never seen Peter abuse women, and he's still one of the best and most professional performers around

Admittedly, he looks foolish when he eats a woman because he pulls a face like a chipmunk, but if that's the worst that can be said of him he's doing well for someone in that business

I think he's preferable to any of the modern-day knuckledraggers (and most of the vintage performers, for that matter)

He's one of the few stunt cocks that actually understands the concept of pornography.

**Ace** · February 5th, 2011, 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goofball Jones

I mean, why watch a couple have sex if people loath the guy so much? I don't understand the psychology behind it.

No, you don't.
The concept of pornography, by definition, is that the viewer (predominantly male) is virtually interacting with the real pornstar, which is the girl. It's about fantasy. Otherwise it is reduced to voyeurism, which is kinda sleazy.

Studios in the old days used to be busted for this very thing, that is involving the viewer in the fantasy. That is the reason you see the endless closeups of males' faces (especially during ejaculation) in old productions. That was how how they avoided pornography charges.

If you want to see modern pornography properly produced, watch some Japanese porn.

February 4th, 2011, 03:21 PM	#12
Goofball Jones Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2010 Posts: 123 Thanks: 206 Thanked 778 Times in 111 Posts	I disagree. While I may be in the vast minority here on VEF, I don't view male pornstars as simply stunt-cocks or the "penis delivery system". The reason I enjoy classic porn is that there were stories and set-ups that gave context to the sex. I enjoy watching two people have sex. The amount of contempt I've read on this board for all male actors is astonishing. Look at all the different threads of male bashing here. All you see is the attitude "I only wanna see them womenz". Certainly there is a plethora of lesbian and solo porn out there that you will never ever see a naked guys hairy ass again. I mean, why watch a couple have sex if people loath the guy so much? I don't understand the psychology behind it. But perhaps that's why porn produced today is almost 90% gonzo...where it's just a bunch of guys using a girl. Rarely see the guy other than their cocks. SO much so that their bodies are off-camera and just this cock floating into the frame. That's what we have now in today's porn and we have no one but ourselves to blame. To me gonzo isn't really porn or erotic...it's just a masturbation device guys use to get off. But as I say, I'm in the minority. Smoking hot sex teamed with a nice set-up and story are going the way of the dodo. Now it's like you want a story, then it's very tame, "couples" films. Want smoking sex, then it's a bunch of guys using a young woman for the sake of doing it....all the while she has the look on her face of "where's my money".

February 4th, 2011, 03:57 PM	#14
blondifan Vintage Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 4,406 Thanks: 55,003 Thanked 60,212 Times in 4,401 Posts	I recently watched "Patti Plenty's Gang Bang" and who should be there to welcome my other favorite porn star "Sweetie Pie" but "Tony Montana" I mean i know the poor guys got AIDS, but wouldn't we all be better off if they had never let him out of prison?

February 5th, 2011, 11:16 AM	#18
nastypiece Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 72 Thanks: 4,898 Thanked 385 Times in 70 Posts	Mark "Limp-Dick" Davies totally rules in the boring sense. He beats Peter N in any way possible when comparing the non-existing thrill of a scene.