The age of natural, hairy bush is gone forever... - Page 6

**billybunter** · March 21st, 2011, 07:26 PM

http://www.youtube.com/results?searc...iry+women&aq=f

Here's a link to a C4 (UK) programme all about the subject.

hotgrcpl · March 22nd, 2011, 07:17 PM

I don't know about a pubic hair ever gracing the pages of Playboy again, but then again: who cares? At least we connoisseurs of the way things are intended to be have this site to enjoy!

**teatsfan** · March 23rd, 2011, 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alvin Lucifer

Not only is it a hassle to shave all the body hair, it can also cause skin irritation, especially in the pubic and axillary areas.

Yes, a shaved pussy on a high res photo with red shaving bumps looks more like a disease than a turn on.

While reading this thread I was thinking, maybe another reason for the shaving trend is better visibility: when porn got more and more explicit, it was just easier to "see it all" when the girl was shaved. Just a thought. Ofcourse today with megapixels and whatnot that's not needed anymore, so hopefully we'll see more girls with natural pussies in mainstream porn again.

eetmiash · March 26th, 2011, 04:54 AM

I grew up watching 90's porn with women like Asia Carrera, PJ Sparxx and Chasey Lain. That's how a woman should look. To me, the whole point of seeing a woman naked is to see her bush. Completely shaven is way too little, 70's bush way too much.

**USBPepsi** · April 5th, 2011, 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eetmiash

I grew up watching 90's porn with women like Asia Carrera, PJ Sparxx and Chasey Lain. That's how a woman should look. To me, the whole point of seeing a woman naked is to see her bush. Completely shaven is way too little, 70's bush way too much.

If by "too much" you mean "the most awesome thing ever", then yes.

**USBPepsi** · April 5th, 2011, 02:29 PM

I don't know about the rest of you, but I seem to be seeing signs that things are turning around. For one thing, whenever you see a woman completely naked in a mainstream Hollywood film (which isn't an everyday occurrence, but comes up occasionally), the actress always has pubes, even if it's a Merkin. That suggests that film studios (legitimate, as opposed to porn) think that the average person expects a lady to have some hair.

People even comment on hair if it isn't properly done. Sienna Miller got ridiculed when photos leaked from the set of Hippie Hippie Shake, because when she was doing a nude swimming scene everyone could see that she had a tiny modern-style landing strip. Everyone immediately cried foul and quite rightly pointed out that a "hippie chick" would have had a full bush; no girl in the 60s would have had a landing strip.

The main sign I've seen, though, that things are slowly getting away from the "bald" look is in the postings here at VEF. There is a lot of material posted her every day, not just vintage, but also a great deal of modern. Over the last six months I've started to see a lot more pictorials in which the models had at least some hair. Compared to how it was a couple years ago, there's definitely an increase in the number of "professional" women with pubes.

I've even noticed that a lot of porn films are now bringing back some hair. A few years ago if you saw pubes, it was probably a specialty film that was all about bush. Now, though, a lot of the "regular" porn product is again featuring pubic hair (I was especially pleased when I saw the Scooby Doo Parody; every woman in that film had pubes).

Whenever someone says that anything is gone forever, I tend to be skeptical. Culture is cyclical. Everything comes back into fashion eventually, unless if it's something that has been proven a health risk (like condom-free sex; and even that has again become the norm in most porn). I figure with pubic hair it's only a matter of time. When girls see enough of a different kind of role model, they'll start following in another direction.

Speaking of role models, even though they're bad ones in almost ever way: The other night I saw either Kourtney or Khloe Kardashian (I can never tell them apart, and don't really care) being interviewed by Chelsea Handler, and one of the things they discussed was how she uses olive oil on her pubes to condition and straighten them (she blames the curliness on her Armenian heritage). So there's another person the young people look up to (God only knows why) who is apparently cultivating a healthy crop.

imp44791 · April 5th, 2011, 09:43 PM

I am also hopeful, and not just because I'm an inveterate optimist. For one, the massive and completely unexpected victory of the natural breast over the bolt-on in porn when all seemed lost circa 1995, taught me that even the most unrefined Neanderthal porn watcher will see the superiority of quality over vulgarity once he's given the option. When those wonderful Eastern European actresses with their natural boobs flooded the market, the majority of consumers found that they had very little time for awful bolt-ons. I saw the same trend in strip clubs across the world (although, granted, my personal experience has been mainly in Europe where plastic was never a majority).

Similarly, now that an increasing number of porn superstars (Sasha Gray springs to mind) begin to sport some quite nice bushes (although I would prefer them to not shave the bottom and just trim there as well) without losing any of their popularity, I hope that the trend is picked up by the copycats and a new generation of porn fans will remember that their genes have programmed them to be turned on by pubic hair. I mean, how can anybody not be moved by the sight of a glorious 80s porn bush like Candie Evens' or -my favourite example- Stacy Donovan's?

Imperator The Optimist

**teatsfan** · April 5th, 2011, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by imp44791

the massive and completely unexpected victory of the natural breast over the bolt-on in porn

umm...is that so? The last time I had the chance to check some of the best selling contemporary porn sites like br@zzers/n@ughty @merica/re@lityklngs, nothing has changed, quite the contrary, with all the piercing and tattoo craze it's getting even worse

imp44791 · April 5th, 2011, 10:33 PM

I never said that we had won against piercings and tattoos, which are indeed the new enemy. Sadly they are quite frequent IRL as well, as they are far cheaper than boobjobs. Plastic boobs though are far from the majority they used to be 15 years ago. Back then they were almost impossible to avoid; now it is trivial to do so, even if one strictly sticks (why?) to US porn.

This is victory; it's not eradication, sadly, but I'm happy enough.

Imperator

Lurk_D · April 6th, 2011, 04:55 AM

I recently saw a preview for a scene with Peter North and up-and-coming bubbly blonde star Bree Olson. After years of a landing strip or less, miss Olson had a wondrous-looking full bush, including underneath. Awe inspiring.

March 21st, 2011, 07:26 PM	#51
billybunter R.I.P. Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Gone But Not Forgotten Posts: 14,404 Thanks: 51,687 Thanked 252,372 Times in 14,171 Posts	http://www.youtube.com/results?searc...iry+women&aq=f Here's a link to a C4 (UK) programme all about the subject. __________________ To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

April 5th, 2011, 02:29 PM	#56
USBPepsi Vintage Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: USA Posts: 2,435 Thanks: 62,015 Thanked 27,437 Times in 2,401 Posts	I don't know about the rest of you, but I seem to be seeing signs that things are turning around. For one thing, whenever you see a woman completely naked in a mainstream Hollywood film (which isn't an everyday occurrence, but comes up occasionally), the actress always has pubes, even if it's a Merkin. That suggests that film studios (legitimate, as opposed to porn) think that the average person expects a lady to have some hair. People even comment on hair if it isn't properly done. Sienna Miller got ridiculed when photos leaked from the set of Hippie Hippie Shake, because when she was doing a nude swimming scene everyone could see that she had a tiny modern-style landing strip. Everyone immediately cried foul and quite rightly pointed out that a "hippie chick" would have had a full bush; no girl in the 60s would have had a landing strip. The main sign I've seen, though, that things are slowly getting away from the "bald" look is in the postings here at VEF. There is a lot of material posted her every day, not just vintage, but also a great deal of modern. Over the last six months I've started to see a lot more pictorials in which the models had at least some hair. Compared to how it was a couple years ago, there's definitely an increase in the number of "professional" women with pubes. I've even noticed that a lot of porn films are now bringing back some hair. A few years ago if you saw pubes, it was probably a specialty film that was all about bush. Now, though, a lot of the "regular" porn product is again featuring pubic hair (I was especially pleased when I saw the Scooby Doo Parody; every woman in that film had pubes). Whenever someone says that anything is gone forever, I tend to be skeptical. Culture is cyclical. Everything comes back into fashion eventually, unless if it's something that has been proven a health risk (like condom-free sex; and even that has again become the norm in most porn). I figure with pubic hair it's only a matter of time. When girls see enough of a different kind of role model, they'll start following in another direction. Speaking of role models, even though they're bad ones in almost ever way: The other night I saw either Kourtney or Khloe Kardashian (I can never tell them apart, and don't really care) being interviewed by Chelsea Handler, and one of the things they discussed was how she uses olive oil on her pubes to condition and straighten them (she blames the curliness on her Armenian heritage). So there's another person the young people look up to (God only knows why) who is apparently cultivating a healthy crop. __________________ The guy formerly known as that guy, now known as this guy.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

March 22nd, 2011, 07:17 PM	#52
hotgrcpl Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: in the heart of Christian Reformed west Michigan Posts: 9 Thanks: 314 Thanked 33 Times in 9 Posts	I don't know about a pubic hair ever gracing the pages of Playboy again, but then again: who cares? At least we connoisseurs of the way things are intended to be have this site to enjoy!

March 26th, 2011, 04:54 AM	#54
eetmiash Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 170 Thanks: 1,636 Thanked 1,761 Times in 151 Posts	I grew up watching 90's porn with women like Asia Carrera, PJ Sparxx and Chasey Lain. That's how a woman should look. To me, the whole point of seeing a woman naked is to see her bush. Completely shaven is way too little, 70's bush way too much.

April 5th, 2011, 09:43 PM	#57
imp44791 Senior Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: Caledonia Citerior Posts: 262 Thanks: 122 Thanked 2,038 Times in 246 Posts	I am also hopeful, and not just because I'm an inveterate optimist. For one, the massive and completely unexpected victory of the natural breast over the bolt-on in porn when all seemed lost circa 1995, taught me that even the most unrefined Neanderthal porn watcher will see the superiority of quality over vulgarity once he's given the option. When those wonderful Eastern European actresses with their natural boobs flooded the market, the majority of consumers found that they had very little time for awful bolt-ons. I saw the same trend in strip clubs across the world (although, granted, my personal experience has been mainly in Europe where plastic was never a majority). Similarly, now that an increasing number of porn superstars (Sasha Gray springs to mind) begin to sport some quite nice bushes (although I would prefer them to not shave the bottom and just trim there as well) without losing any of their popularity, I hope that the trend is picked up by the copycats and a new generation of porn fans will remember that their genes have programmed them to be turned on by pubic hair. I mean, how can anybody not be moved by the sight of a glorious 80s porn bush like Candie Evens' or -my favourite example- Stacy Donovan's? Imperator The Optimist

April 5th, 2011, 10:33 PM	#59
imp44791 Senior Member Join Date: May 2010 Location: Caledonia Citerior Posts: 262 Thanks: 122 Thanked 2,038 Times in 246 Posts	I never said that we had won against piercings and tattoos, which are indeed the new enemy. Sadly they are quite frequent IRL as well, as they are far cheaper than boobjobs. Plastic boobs though are far from the majority they used to be 15 years ago. Back then they were almost impossible to avoid; now it is trivial to do so, even if one strictly sticks (why?) to US porn. This is victory; it's not eradication, sadly, but I'm happy enough. Imperator

April 6th, 2011, 04:55 AM	#60
Lurk_D Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Posts: 489 Thanks: 22 Thanked 3,914 Times in 467 Posts	I recently saw a preview for a scene with Peter North and up-and-coming bubbly blonde star Bree Olson. After years of a landing strip or less, miss Olson had a wondrous-looking full bush, including underneath. Awe inspiring.