Donna Edmondson discussion

[keats]

Originally Posted by Lurk_D

To sum up, anything you say about yourself must be taken as the truth, because who would know best? Anyone that disputes it must provide concrete proof, or they're lying.

Conversely, anything you say about someone else is a bald-faced lie, unless you can provide concrete proof to back up your claim.

If you can't prove it, you're wrong. If you won't prove it, that is proof you're lying.

If you're trying to paraphrase what I said you got it completely wrong. What I said is that the preponderance of evidence in the bio of Donna Edmonsdon makes the claims made above extremely unlikely. Once again I ask, how is possible that the story has held for all these years? Anybody can believe what he wants but gossip is just that, gossip; usually gossip carries its own motives.