|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Celebrity, Film & Television Discussion For all of your chat, opinion and thoughts on mainstream celebrities, film and television programmes. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
September 3rd, 2014, 04:57 PM | #31 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 21
Thanks: 683
Thanked 189 Times in 21 Posts
|
Many years ago, when I "knew people," I had a friend in Hollywood who was a collector and private auctioneer of celebrity ephemera. One item that had come into his possession was a portfolio of nudes posed by Grace Kelly. These were taken in days when the Hayes Code kept nudity off movie screens and there was no legitimate market for a celebrity to pose nude, they were taken for reasons subsequently obscured by time. My friend, who had seen an impressive list of A-list actresses in similar photos, offered his own theory that this was Kelly's way of marketing her sexuality without resorting to the casting couch. Had the pictures ever been made public (and in the intervening twenty years, I've never seen one of them even on the Interwebs), Kelly would only have had to claim that they were "private photos" that had been stolen, or the old reliable "I was young, I needed the money" defense.
The point is, it is nothing new for actresses to traffic nude images of themselves for a variety of reasons. If the photos are ever made public, they have plausible deniability (private images that were stolen by unscrupulous hackers). They get all the press, a measure of public sympathy, and no harm done. A few "cease and desist" letters gets the pics taken down from most major sites, and life goes on. Far less collateral damage than actually posing nude, since one doesn't have to worry about their body being scrutinized by the mainstream press or the public at large. And far less traumatic than appearing nude on film, knowing that a lot of those DVDs are being used for "personal entertainment" and there's not a damned thing you can do about it. Witness Scarlet Johansson. Her allegedly private, and relatively modest, nudes were "leaked" all over the Internet, she played the victim card to a T. But with 30 coming on fast, and her expiration date as a hot young starlet approaching, she had to resort to putting out the full monty in the relatively unwatchable Under the Skin. No actress wants to end up in the lonely Hell of the Formerly Hot. Or, consider Vanessa Hudgens. Desperate to shed her Disney image, she let slip some fairly impressive nudes. When that failed to jump start her career as a Real Movie Star, she brought out the clam (knowing full well that the pictures, ostensibly taken when she was underage, would almost immediately disappear from all but the darkest corners of the Web). And again, there's nothing new under the sun. Disney darling Hailey Mills even hauled out the girls on film back in the day to create a clear line of demarcation between her past and future roles. So, forgive me if I am somewhat skeptical that these were all private property intended for privileged eyes only and that all these women are just unwitting victims. Everyone who has come of age during the Internet Era knows implicitly that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy for anything connected to a vast network of individual devices. As we know, one of the first rules of the Internet is that it is a postcard, not a letter.
__________________
"Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats." -H.L. Mencken |
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Cap'n Zippy For This Useful Post: |
September 3rd, 2014, 06:00 PM | #32 | |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 17
Thanks: 72
Thanked 405 Times in 12 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to WickedUnclErni For This Useful Post: |
September 3rd, 2014, 06:59 PM | #33 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: MIA
Posts: 15,691
Thanks: 66,289
Thanked 209,988 Times in 15,731 Posts
|
Thank you Wicked, that made me smile
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to ball7 For This Useful Post: |
September 3rd, 2014, 07:43 PM | #34 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Middle England
Posts: 4,491
Thanks: 10,176
Thanked 43,618 Times in 4,154 Posts
|
though i agree with uncle above, the pix i've seen from the hack clearly show her with no pubic hair in any case... but the pic above is the work of a fakir, as the pubis just looks wrong, too straight and wrong shade/colour. if the image was larger he'd have had little chance of passing it off in the places he has so far already.
__________________
Arguing with a intelligent person is hard; but arguing with a stupid person is impossible! |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pharoahegypt For This Useful Post: |
September 3rd, 2014, 09:45 PM | #35 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 32,106
Thanks: 174,782
Thanked 634,612 Times in 31,427 Posts
|
I downloaded a more than 1gb torrent of this stuff, before it mysteriously got removed from another site, massive amounts of duplicates maybe 90 percent, the Michelle Keegan picture was just a pair of anonymous tits, could have been anybody, and has long been posted before, don't bother with it.
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to rotobott For This Useful Post: |
September 3rd, 2014, 09:46 PM | #36 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 710
Thanks: 14,638
Thanked 7,446 Times in 682 Posts
|
After examination, I would gather a guess that many of the close up boob shots of Kate Upton are a different girl entirely.
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to John C. Holmes For This Useful Post: |
September 4th, 2014, 03:35 AM | #37 | |
Lean Mean Screencap Machine
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Better you don't know.
Posts: 23,807
Thanks: 10,480
Thanked 207,343 Times in 23,716 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. I rage and weep for my country. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. I can reup screencaps, other material might have been lost. |
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to DTravel For This Useful Post: |
September 4th, 2014, 07:52 AM | #38 |
R.I.P.
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Gone But Not Forgotten
Posts: 3,934
Thanks: 51,364
Thanked 48,453 Times in 3,898 Posts
|
I was thinking of starting a thread (after Mock The Week) called 'Posts you wouldn't expect to see at VEF' but I didn't think I'd be able to find any material...
__________________
I'm sorry Gentlemen, that's all the lipstick around the nipple we have time for To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to MrInBetween For This Useful Post: |
September 4th, 2014, 04:27 PM | #39 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 518
Thanks: 6,259
Thanked 9,892 Times in 500 Posts
|
Why would they hoard nude pics? To increase their trading value, keep it within a small circle of fellow hackers and trade accordingly... I appreciate that goes against everything VEF holds dear and that's why, if it's true, I think it sucks
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Norman Stanley Fletcher For This Useful Post: |
September 5th, 2014, 08:53 AM | #40 | |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 518
Thanks: 6,259
Thanked 9,892 Times in 500 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Norman Stanley Fletcher For This Useful Post: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|