Wank Club!

[a51ok]

This is how I'm starting the day.
If you want to see morePM me, Or WANK CHAT

THe printed text and shots form the original photo session do it for me.

[manet]

My first post to this thread. Though I have been checking it out regularly. And I love the concept.

Mayfair was always my magazine of choice in my youth. And I still go back to those images from time to time when I need some relief. Here are some of my favourite girls from the time. I'm intending to spend some seed over them very shortly......





I'm not sure if this stuff is interesting to you guys.....but a bit of background on a couple of the girls. Nina Pickersgill (middle row in the centre) was the centrefold in the first men's magazine I ever bought. She was probably the first model that I wanked over. I still think she is gorgeous. And Tracey Middlemass (bottom row, far right) always reminds me of a younger version of a MILF that I used to work with. Now I am not suggesting that the two girls might have been one and the same person....but the similarity is striking. I love to wank over Tracey's picture while thinking about my sexy co-worker.....

[Baranovich]

Surfed through so much porn this morning and nothing was really sparking anything until I saw THIS photo. Ohhh god it never fails, you find that one picture that just gets you instantly edging and right back into wanking mode.

A perfectly blown load right into her pretty, fiery red hair. What a perfect face and body, dear lord, and that lusty smile...

I'm done for!

[SexObjex]

A while back I was cataloging my porn collection, number of images, length of video, etc. (all of this is digital, encrypted, hidden, that way if I die in a car wreck no one finds a closet stacked with VHS tapes and is ashamed of me for life).

I deduced that if you put it all together and assumed a 20-minute stroke session, theoretically I could have 22,400 orgasms without looking at the same image or scene twice.

Ejaculations range greatly with age, fitness, recent performance, hydration, erectile dysfunction and other factors. I've seen 3.7 mL as an average and that sounds about right. Again, this is a theoretical measurement. Anyway, that ends up about about 83 liters of jizz, and in Imperial measurements, almost 22 gallons of goo.

However, that was two months ago I have since filled my 8 TB of storage to capacity, using a second drive to catch the, heh, spill-over until I can buy a roomier library for my voluminous catalog of smut.

Here's Tobi Pacific to provide a visual metaphor of how big my porn collection is in terms of cumshot.

[SexObjex]

Actually, just for the hell of it, I decided to work the theoretical equivalence in the other direction — how much is one ejaculation worth, in megabytes of data? I figure that I have a large enough sample size of image formats, video quality and length, that the time equivalence of the slideshow (five seconds per image) and combined time of the video collection would give a believable average. Some videos are longer in time but smaller in file size, some images are huge, but with more than 123 hours of footage and about 5.4 million images, that will produce a good average.

Drumroll (or cumroll): 337.5 megabytes equals one orgasm (male) masturbating to digital porn.

So you can apply that to your collections as you see fit and now you can express how much you have of a particular girl in terms of orgasm. For example, I have everything of Petra Verkaik, from her personal site to Playboy — everything. That comes (heh heh) to 178.55 unique orgasms. In her catalog.

That's a lot of cum for the buck.

I'd post a picture of Petra, but she's banned here, so here instead is her colleague Sherry Arnett, who got my cumshot this morning. One of the sexiest, silkiest, prettiest pussies in Playboy history ...

[catweasel28]

Originally Posted by pasteye

As to quantity/ejaculation - it is of course where 10cc reputably got the band name from...

Not forgetting The Lovin' Spoonful and Pearl Jam.

Plus, as this is the Wank Club thread, not the Band Names one, I'd better include a few pics to wank to.

[andix]

Petra Morgan - what an arse, what lovely tits and what a great face to cum over

[Baranovich]

Originally Posted by SexObjex

A while back I was cataloging my porn collection, number of images, length of video, etc. (all of this is digital, encrypted, hidden, that way if I die in a car wreck no one finds a closet stacked with VHS tapes and is ashamed of me for life).

I deduced that if you put it all together and assumed a 20-minute stroke session, theoretically I could have 22,400 orgasms without looking at the same image or scene twice.

Ejaculations range greatly with age, fitness, recent performance, hydration, erectile dysfunction and other factors. I've seen 3.7 mL as an average and that sounds about right. Again, this is a theoretical measurement. Anyway, that ends up about about 83 liters of jizz, and in Imperial measurements, almost 22 gallons of goo.

However, that was two months ago I have since filled my 8 TB of storage to capacity, using a second drive to catch the, heh, spill-over until I can buy a roomier library for my voluminous catalog of smut.

Here's Tobi Pacific to provide a visual metaphor of how big my porn collection is in terms of cumshot.

Very interesting topic! An aspect of porn wanking that I had not considered!

I think I might be an outlier, (possibly an extreme outlier) when it comes to average amount of load blown per amount of porn data downloaded/consumed/viewed.

I've been using hand-held japanese pussy replica masturbators for over 12 years, I don't use my bare hand for masturbating. I could probably count on one hand (pardon the pun, ) the number of times I classically "jerked off" with just my fist over the past fifteen years. Once I discovered the ecstatic wonder of masturbation toys I never looked back. They make masturbating to porn a surreal, almost spiritual experience. It's insanely euphoric and also quite seriously addicting.

The reason that I call myself an outlier is that I've gotten into masturbating with edging sessions that are extended in length. I NEVER sit down for a porn session with the intention of blowing a load within a few minutes or even a half hour. Even when time is short I will edge without shooting. I tend to edge at least for four or five hours typically, looking at a variety of porn (solo girls, softcore and hardcore, softcore models videos, one particular porn stars pictures and videos, cumshot compilations, etc. etc.).

When I have more time to myself I will typically edge on and off for six-plus hours, up to twelve or more hours is no rarity. I will often edge for a day, then go to sleep that night, go back to edging the next day and end up not shooting a load until that next afternoon or evening.

As to the volume it is difficult to determine. I shoot a lot less overall because as I said I'm cumming a lot less due to the amount of edging done in between loads.

However as to the force and volume of each, individual load I am SURE that I am right up there at the top. I do not smoke tobacco and I don't drink alcohol, and I always drink plenty of water. I'm 46 years old and my penis' plumbing is in pretty good shape. If I edge for anything over an hour my loads are forceful and huge. Edging to porn makes it even more powerful and the quality of the masturbation toys make it even MORE powerful.

It is amazing how forceful I can shoot using mastubator toys. If I use an open-ended toy where the load can shoot out of the top, the first rope of my load typically shoots several feet into the air and the rest shoots with about half of that force. If I'm using what I usually use which are the close-ended toys like the Succubus or Fleshlight my load always nearly fills the channel and comes spilling out. The loads that masturbator toys produce are AMAZING. I have zero erectile dysfunction when I combine toys with porn.

Unfortunately, I've had the reverse effect happen to me with regard to penile dysfunction. Because the toys and porn are so stimulating and so intoxicating and arousing, I have trouble being erect for my girlfriend for actual sex, and that is not so good.

However, that being said - my sex drive and my arousal are strong enough that if I can refrain from edging and cumming for a few days I can usually perform perfectly well with real sex. I'm very attracted to my girlfriend and it's a constant battle between my dick craving the next edging session inside those freaking amazing toys and actually being with her again.

The REAL trouble? These freaking japanese toys are INSANELY good, I am not joking! Of course most guys would say there's nothing like the feel of a real pussy and a real woman - weeelllllllll........yes....but.....however let me tell you - these toys come DAMN CLOSE, in fact sometimes they feel better than my girlfriend. No lie. The Succubus masturbator for SURE feels better than some of the woman I've been inside of. They're that good. And when you combine the stimulation of being able to look at an entire folder of hundreds of Playboy playmates with perfect bodies up close while this exquisitely soft vagina sleeve is caressing your dick into bliss - sometimes real sex can't compete.

Hate to admit that, but I'd be lying to say otherwise!

[profvolup]

Originally Posted by SexObjex

... I deduced that if you put it all together and assumed a 20-minute stroke session, theoretically I could have 22,400 orgasms without looking at the same image or scene twice.
Ejaculations range greatly with age, fitness, recent performance, hydration, erectile dysfunction and other factors. I've seen 3.7 mL as an average and that sounds about right. Again, this is a theoretical measurement. Anyway, that ends up about about 83 liters of jizz, and in Imperial measurements, almost 22 gallons of goo.

Originally Posted by SexObjex

Actually, just for the hell of it, I decided to work the theoretical equivalence in the other direction — how much is one ejaculation worth, in megabytes of data? I figure that I have a large enough sample size of image formats, video quality and length, that the time equivalence of the slideshow (five seconds per image) and combined time of the video collection would give a believable average. Some videos are longer in time but smaller in file size, some images are huge, but with more than 123 hours of footage and about 5.4 million images, that will produce a good average.
Drumroll (or cumroll): 337.5 megabytes equals one orgasm (male) masturbating to digital porn.
So you can apply that to your collections as you see fit and now you can express how much you have of a particular girl in terms of orgasm. For example, I have everything of Petra Verkaik, from her personal site to Playboy — everything. That comes (heh heh) to 178.55 unique orgasms. In her catalog.
That's a lot of cum for the buck.

This actually made me smile ... and actually leads to some of my prior thoughts from many years ago (late '90s actually).

Imagine, if you will, if instead of buying content, we could 'micro-pay' after-the-fact, for ejaculations to a babe's content? How much of us would do that?

A satisfying ejaculation to porn is easily worth $5-20 in my life, and others will differ, possibly as low as $1, others easily $100.

But imagine if we could somehow 'micropay' to each lady when they 'take our load'?

How many of us would really do that? I know I would. I think a good number of us men would.

Bypass the distributor, who is becoming less and less of a factor in this age of self-publishing, and we have a real answer to seeing the actual ladies receive the money, instead of having to rely on alleged 'content creators' and 'distributors.'

Just a thought. It'll probably go nowhere, as it hasn't prior. But just a thought, since we seem to define things very differently than -- let's be honest -- we men actually 'consume.'

[SexObjex]

Let me ask this, just as a humorous thought exercise. I'm going to do a full audit of my collection in about two weeks, probably, and I'll be able to put some more precise measurements on it.

But for the laughs of it, what do we want to call the unit of measurement (in data) that is equivalent to one orgasm of pleasurable length when viewing digital porn?

I wanted to call it the Petra because I think I've shot the most load to her, career (going back to 1989 when I was 16) but, again, doesn't make sense to give Miss Verkaik that honor when we can't post her stuff on VEF.

After that, who? Who would you speculate is the girl who has caused the most loads to be ejaculated in the history of masturbating to porn? Even if Playboy had some pulse-racing centerfolds in the 1980s, the explosion of availability of online porn in the 1990s and then the stratospheric acceleration of content afterward is enough to make any mainstream name seem quaint.

The "Danni"? That would be, IMO, a great designation for the number of megabytes required to achieve pleasurable cumshot, given her tremendous success on the frontier of Internet porn and, moreover, how much she's embraced the persona and lifestyle and done things on her terms. And plus the fact I love her big tits.

ETA: Sorry, here are some girls to keep this on topic. Tracey Neve, Marina Larsen, K.C. Williams, Kyla Cole and Tammi Benton.