|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Politics, Current Affairs, Religion Threads Post here for all Politics, Current Affairs, Religion Threads |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
February 2nd, 2013, 05:21 PM | #11 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,044
Thanks: 24,638
Thanked 34,288 Times in 4,008 Posts
|
blueballsdc,
Quote:
Rachel Maddow had a field day with Gov. Ultrasound: http://maddowblog.msnbc.com/_news/20...nd-probes?lite I think he'll have real problems with the female vote and don't think he'll have much of a chance. |
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to 9876543210 For This Useful Post: |
February 2nd, 2013, 09:33 PM | #12 | |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: England
Posts: 26,237
Thanks: 162,389
Thanked 278,435 Times in 26,182 Posts
|
Quote:
It's a bit UnAmerican, I would have said.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to scoundrel For This Useful Post: |
February 2nd, 2013, 10:57 PM | #13 | |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,721
Thanks: 112,645
Thanked 21,427 Times in 1,713 Posts
|
Quote:
Of course, a lot will depend upon who else decides to run. I expect Rick Perry will throw his hat in the ring again (and probably miss) along with Paul Ryan. Marco Rubio is clearly being groomed for bigger and better things, although he may choose to wait a few years longer. I also have a sneaking suspicion that Ted Cruz may try his hand at a presidential campaign. |
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to blueballsdc For This Useful Post: |
February 2nd, 2013, 11:25 PM | #14 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,044
Thanks: 24,638
Thanked 34,288 Times in 4,008 Posts
|
scoundrel,
Quote:
As I look around it seems to me they're on the edge of death. They're losing constituencies left and right to the point where the only reliable voting block they have are old white men and the Southern US. They only had about 8% of the black vote in the last election. About 27% of the latino vote. About 45% of the women's vote. The Republicans seem to be divided into two camps. The "middle" of the party which is almost nonexistent and disappearing quickly as they keep being "primaried" by their extreme right wing. And then their extreme right wing which has no chance of winning a general election. Does anybody really think Rand Paul or Rick Santorum could get elected without stealing the election? My guess is the Republicans will have to split. The moderates will have to either become Democrats or Independents (probably taking about half of the Republican party with them). The extreme right will hang around for a while (or maybe try and start a civil war when they realize they've been marginalized) but, as with all such movements, will eventually die out. So the next few years will be interesting. I thought maybe they'd have a brief period of introspection when Bobby Jindahl told them they'd have to "quit being the stupid party" but its now obvious nobody listened to him. And the party's blind devotion to the gun manufacturers is probably going to cost them big time in the next election. So, are the Republicans history? Last edited by 9876543210; February 5th, 2013 at 04:54 PM.. |
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to 9876543210 For This Useful Post: |
February 3rd, 2013, 12:42 AM | #15 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: England
Posts: 26,237
Thanks: 162,389
Thanked 278,435 Times in 26,182 Posts
|
About twenty years ago, the British Labour Party appeared to have painted itself into a similar corner. In Britain, the electorate had moved seismically away from socialism and left of centre beliefs towards economic liberalism and somewhat more militaristic principles. Many social attitudes were affected by the record of the Labour Party in office, when Britain was so badly misgoverned in the 1970s that the authority of the state was undermined; and by their pivotal decision in 1982 as Her Majesty's Loyal Opposition, to withold support from the operation to retake the Falkland Islands from the invading Argentinians using force. That went down like a shit sandwich.
By 1992, Labour had collected two decisive election defeats and in 1992 it collected a third. It went into each campaign believing that the people needed and wanted a socialist-inclined alternative government. Each time they got beat, they merely concluded that they must try harder, that one last heave would do it. When they won in 1997, it was because they stopped relying on mere effort and listened to what voters were saying. Voters weren't voting Conservative because they liked the Tories. My own dad, who voted Tory every time, thought the Tories were upper-class pricks and said so, to the face of every Tory canvasser. He told Wilf Proudfoot MP, to his face, that his party was a bag of arse. But my dad voted in the national interest as near as he could figure out what that was; and that meant keeping Labour out, simply because Labour were incompetent. In 1997, people were so sick of the Tories it was like an emetic just to think of them (even my father admitted that); and finally, by abolishing the hardline socialist clause 4 of the Labour Party constitution, the Labour Party had undertaken to respect capitalism and the mixed economy instead of nationalising the means of production, distribution and exchange. That was the thing which was undoing the Labour Party; it had wanted to micro-manage the economic life of Britain, even though it caused the collapse of the British economy in the 1970s by doing exactly that. To make itself electable, it had to show that it realised it had ruined the whole country last time and wouldn't simply dose the country with the same prescription again. That's the challenge for the US Republicans now. Will they admit, even to themselves, that they misgoverned America so badly that the voters are actively afraid to allow them to govern again? Or will they continue to offer the medicine as before and tell themselves that next time they must try harder to sell the same old neo-liberal economic policies allied to tax cuts for the rich and spurious foreign wars, paid for by borrowing which future generations will need to repay? Will they continue to peddle social conservatism, guns, God, no abortion and knee-jerk reactionary little-America grand standing on issues such as immigration and citizenship? A lot of natural Republican bedrock supporters are very unhappy with these positions; many people who voted for Nixon and even Reagan feel like they don't recognise their own party any more. Many of the "Latino" community (I hate labels, but this one is an approximation which most people,"Latino" and non-"Latino", understand) were alienated by Republican immigration policies, but this didn't mean they were in favour of a free-for-all. They were in favour of rational immigration control policies and wanted an open discussion of what these policies ought to be. The Republicans weren't offering this; and a community which has staunch conservative values, has more than the national average of self-employed small business owners, a higher than national average rate of church attendance, voted 27% Republican. The Republicans have lost touch with their own natural constituencies. One way to save the Republican movement (and actually I think US Democrats should want to save the Republican movement in the interests of plural democracy) would be to make it illegal for God botherers to run for office. Anyone who is a self-professed clergyman (eg the Reverend Pat Robertson) should be disqualified from public office, even as a dog catcher. Any church which donates to any political cause should lose its tax-exemption and be forced to render unto Caesar. These measures would weaken the sclerotic grip of God-botherers on the Republican movement and make it easier for electable candidates to get past the primaries. Romney and Ryan was an extremely socially conservative ticket and went down badly with the voters for precisely that reason; but Romney had a titanic struggle to get selected by Republican party members at grass roots level, who seriously contemplated selecting Rick Santorum. Until it reaches a stage where a candidate like Rick Santorum would be laughed at by the Republican grass roots, the Republican Party will struggle to reach out beyond its own grass roots and appeal to voters who have moderate conservative beliefs.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to scoundrel For This Useful Post: |
February 3rd, 2013, 04:32 AM | #16 |
Lean Mean Screencap Machine
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Better you don't know.
Posts: 23,804
Thanks: 10,480
Thanked 207,303 Times in 23,713 Posts
|
The Republican Party has learned nothing from their losses and has no intention of making changes. Instead they want to rig the "game", breaking the current way of electing the US President.
http://news.msn.com/politics/gop-eye...-dems-are-wary For those of you who don't know how we (the US) does it, the President here is not elected directly by the popular vote. Instead each state has a number of Electoral College delegates equal to the number of Senators and Representatives the state has. So whichever candidate wins the popular vote in a given state "wins" all of that state's Electoral College delegates. Then whoever wins a majority in the Electoral College wins the election. This tends to mirror the popular vote but theoretically can vary from it. What the Republicans are proposing to do is change this, but only in states where they control the state government and Obama won the Presidential vote. Instead, again ONLY IN THOSE PARTICULAR STATES, they want the Electoral College delegates to be assigned by the vote of individual districts. Basically, in states where they won the Presidential vote they want to keep the system as is but in states they lost they want to rig it so as to guarantee they get some of the votes and the Democrats can't get them all. Its a fairly blatant attempt to rig the next election.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. I rage and weep for my country. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. I can reup screencaps, other material might have been lost. |
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to DTravel For This Useful Post: |
February 3rd, 2013, 05:06 AM | #17 | |||||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,044
Thanks: 24,638
Thanked 34,288 Times in 4,008 Posts
|
scoundrel,
I realize it must sound preposterous to even think about the demise of the Republicans but, from watching their actions prior to and since the election, I'm beginning to think they may not be able to recover. Its interesting to see the correlations to the British Labour party and maybe the Republicans will turn things around. But they're showing no interest in paying anything other than lip service to their problems. Yes, a very, very few are saying they need to change but their actions belie their words. Just one example of how tone dead they are. Only a couple of days after they were smacked down in the election, Ohio Republicans introduced a personhood amendment! http://www.dispatch.com/content/stor...-abortion.html Quote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...uck-with-that/ Quote:
Quote:
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/3036789/ns..._joe/#50663688 Quote:
Quote:
So I guess the question is, can the Republicans survive if they can't win the Presidency and Senate? Only controlling in the House? Personally, I think they may be dead because they only have old white men and racists remaining. Not going to get far any longer with that constituency any longer. |
|||||
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to 9876543210 For This Useful Post: |
February 3rd, 2013, 12:11 PM | #18 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: England
Posts: 26,237
Thanks: 162,389
Thanked 278,435 Times in 26,182 Posts
|
It is not preposterous. The Republicans were originally created out of a massive schism in the former American Whig party over slavery. Slavery is a defunct issue today, but tension between conflicting regional interests is alive and well. The religious right are strongest in the South and South-West states, excluding California. But in places like Ohio, California, key swing states, the totemic God-botherer positions on abortion, contraception, treatment of sexually transmitted diseases, the classic banners of mean-spirited social repression, play badly, as Todd Akin discovered. Away from Florida and the heartland of anti-Castro expatriates, the US blockade of Cuba doesn't impress the voters. Anti-immigration stances are a very double edged sword, even in bedrock Republican voter groups and they don't help candidates tryingto appeal to the centre ground. What happened in the 1850s could happen again; a schism based on regional interests. At the moment, I don't see what the touchstone issue might be which would create the fracture.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to scoundrel For This Useful Post: |
February 3rd, 2013, 05:43 PM | #19 | |||
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,044
Thanks: 24,638
Thanked 34,288 Times in 4,008 Posts
|
scoundrel,
Quote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=03unoBg06G0 "In a 2009 self-published book, Representative Jon Hubbard of Jonesboro calls slavery a “blessing in disguise” for blacks, who otherwise would have still struggled as “African tribesmen” instead of becoming the citizens of “the greatest nation” on earth. “The institution of slavery that the black race has long believed to be an abomination upon its people may actually have been a blessing in disguise,” Hubbard argues in Letters to the Editor: Confessions of a Frustrated Conservative. “The blacks who could endure those conditions and circumstances would someday be rewarded with citizenship in the greatest nation ever established upon the face of this Earth.” http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/10/09/...aign-comments/ Those three are actually typical of many modern Republicans. And they're actually in some places you wouldn't expect. There was a time, only a few years ago, when the Ku Klux Klans largest membership was actually in Indiana! Not in a southern state. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to 9876543210 For This Useful Post: |
February 3rd, 2013, 07:07 PM | #20 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,721
Thanks: 112,645
Thanked 21,427 Times in 1,713 Posts
|
The Republican party is far from dead. Just look at their control of Governorships, state legislatures, and local municipalities. I'm not saying that the party won't change. I could very well imagine a split between the religious elements, the conservative elements, and the moderate elements of the party. There are many Republicans that are fiscal and social conservatives but not very religious. I can't see things ending up as multi-party because the politics in the USA are really only set up for two big parties.
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to blueballsdc For This Useful Post: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|