The Girls of the old spick and span - Page 128

**JGW** · November 23rd, 2010, 04:18 PM

The delectable Roz Stuart. Here she hoists up her skirt to reveal her panties - and it is nice to see the outline of her suspender beneath the material of the panties. And of course she unbuttons her blouse to show off her beautiful brassiere. Stocking tops are on view as ever. And she is clearly very happy to be photographed with her clothes in such a sexy state of disarray. I mean she would not go down to the supermarket like that. She did do a wet set in a similar outfit but it would be nice to see her showering wearing this lot, if only to see those panties turn more transparent and that white top cling to her boobs.

**JGW** · November 23rd, 2010, 07:28 PM

Jenny Spencer again. There's always something particularly alluring about a pretty girl dressed only in underwear and a loosely fitting shirt top in the countryside. And from her expression she obviously feels admired by the photographer. KH again maybe. Anyway a lovely view of Jenny's breasts - and because she is kneeling down, more detail can be seen in the picture, the model being closer to the camera. Jenny's suspender belt and panties look terrific.

**Knickers1** · November 27th, 2010, 04:25 AM

For Medium 2 and other interested parties.

Confirmation of Nicola's home.

The attached pic and narrative confirm my theory to be correct. Much of the photography was, in deed, carried out at Nicola's own home. I suspect this would have made a photo session much easier for her, having two young girls to deal with. I would imagine Marie, Laura (Brenda) and others would have lived close by and would have dropped in for their photo sessions too. The pages shown were taken from Spick & Span Extra, number 56.

I must apologise for the low quality of the images as my scanner is not working and, have simply photographed the pages by hand. Nick

**Knickers1** · November 27th, 2010, 07:10 AM

We have established that the interior pictures are Nicola's house (see last posting); and I believe the alfresco pictures, here, are her house too. Medium2 confirmed, in an earlier posting, that she had used her own name for her modelling assignments. Just imagine, gentlemen, being a keen collector of Spick and Span, in the days when Nicola was modelling and living around the corner from her and knowing her? What a delicious thought. I wonder if she was plagued with admirers during her modelling days?! Nick

mikehobart · November 27th, 2010, 11:31 AM

This thread really brings back some memories. I remember reading a lot of SPICK, SPAN and BEAUTIFUL BRITONS. They look so innocent today, but at the time we thought they were cutting edge stuff. I suspect nowadays you could run almost identical pictures as advertisements for underwear!

**JGW** · November 27th, 2010, 01:15 PM

Gorgeous girl. Would have been nice if she had posed in the bath fully clothed, shoes and all. Wonderful to imagine those panties going transparent.

**JGW** · November 27th, 2010, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Knickers1

We have established that the interior pictures are Nicola's house (see last posting); and I believe the alfresco pictures, here, are her house too. Medium2 confirmed, in an earlier posting, that she had used her own name for her modelling assignments. Just imagine, gentlemen, being a keen collector of Spick and Span, in the days when Nicola was modelling and living around the corner from her and knowing her? What a delicious thought. I wonder if she was plagued with admirers during her modelling days?! Nick

Perhaps nobody knew - or very few. Spick Span was considered quite daring in those days and was not in every newsagents. Parade and Fiesta were the popular magazines. Anyway, the pictures are totally lovely and totally innocent. Good to work at home with easyacess to all those bras, panties and suspender belts. Still no word from Ken Howard the photographer. He must surely be reading all these posts about his marvellous work.

Medium2 · November 27th, 2010, 05:59 PM

We can't assume that KH is even aware of this site!

Nick; While I certainly take the point about NT being on a toddlers pushy thingy is good evidence that she did have young children, it's wrong to asume that the stuff that was written to accompay the photos is factual. Another photographer who'd had stuff in the mags told me that it often wasn't.

I didn't say that 'Nicola Taylor' was her real name, by the way. I said it was what she told me it was! As she was a lot less forthcoming and friendly than LSJ didn't particularly believe her!

**Knickers1** · November 29th, 2010, 08:49 AM

Sadly, I suspect you are right, Medium2 and, the narrative provided with the photo sets is probably somewhat spurious. One just has to look at how many times the same girl was featured in the magazines over the years with different names. I always hoped however, that things were different with Nicola and friends. Oh what a pity KH is probably unaware of this site as, only he can illuminate us with the true facts......I live in hope. One of my all time fav pics of Nicola and Marie in "Nicola's house". Nick

**Knickers1** · November 30th, 2010, 06:03 AM

Have ignored the lovely Suan Douglass too long. Found these on the thread archives. Those lacy, black pants are sensational. Just imagine being an onlooker when this session was taking place...hmmmm ! Great legs too ! Credit to manowar1952 for original postings. Nick

November 23rd, 2010, 07:28 PM	#1272
JGW Vintage Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 1,038 Thanks: 2,845 Thanked 25,653 Times in 1,013 Posts	Jenny Spencer again. There's always something particularly alluring about a pretty girl dressed only in underwear and a loosely fitting shirt top in the countryside. And from her expression she obviously feels admired by the photographer. KH again maybe. Anyway a lovely view of Jenny's breasts - and because she is kneeling down, more detail can be seen in the picture, the model being closer to the camera. Jenny's suspender belt and panties look terrific. Last edited by JGW; November 25th, 2010 at 06:53 PM..

November 27th, 2010, 04:25 AM	#1273
Knickers1 Vintage Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Northumberland Posts: 2,325 Thanks: 6,268 Thanked 60,408 Times in 2,314 Posts	For Medium 2 and other interested parties. Confirmation of Nicola's home. The attached pic and narrative confirm my theory to be correct. Much of the photography was, in deed, carried out at Nicola's own home. I suspect this would have made a photo session much easier for her, having two young girls to deal with. I would imagine Marie, Laura (Brenda) and others would have lived close by and would have dropped in for their photo sessions too. The pages shown were taken from Spick & Span Extra, number 56. I must apologise for the low quality of the images as my scanner is not working and, have simply photographed the pages by hand. Nick Last edited by Knickers1; November 27th, 2010 at 04:34 AM.. Reason: Text

November 27th, 2010, 05:59 PM	#1278
Medium2 Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 367 Thanks: 1,767 Thanked 3,617 Times in 338 Posts	We can't assume that KH is even aware of this site! Nick; While I certainly take the point about NT being on a toddlers pushy thingy is good evidence that she did have young children, it's wrong to asume that the stuff that was written to accompay the photos is factual. Another photographer who'd had stuff in the mags told me that it often wasn't. I didn't say that 'Nicola Taylor' was her real name, by the way. I said it was what she told me it was! As she was a lot less forthcoming and friendly than LSJ didn't particularly believe her! Last edited by Medium2; April 15th, 2018 at 08:34 PM..

November 29th, 2010, 08:49 AM	#1279
Knickers1 Vintage Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Northumberland Posts: 2,325 Thanks: 6,268 Thanked 60,408 Times in 2,314 Posts	Sadly, I suspect you are right, Medium2 and, the narrative provided with the photo sets is probably somewhat spurious. One just has to look at how many times the same girl was featured in the magazines over the years with different names. I always hoped however, that things were different with Nicola and friends. Oh what a pity KH is probably unaware of this site as, only he can illuminate us with the true facts......I live in hope. One of my all time fav pics of Nicola and Marie in "Nicola's house". Nick Last edited by Knickers1; November 29th, 2010 at 09:00 AM.. Reason: Text

November 23rd, 2010, 04:18 PM	#1271
JGW Vintage Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 1,038 Thanks: 2,845 Thanked 25,653 Times in 1,013 Posts	The delectable Roz Stuart. Here she hoists up her skirt to reveal her panties - and it is nice to see the outline of her suspender beneath the material of the panties. And of course she unbuttons her blouse to show off her beautiful brassiere. Stocking tops are on view as ever. And she is clearly very happy to be photographed with her clothes in such a sexy state of disarray. I mean she would not go down to the supermarket like that. She did do a wet set in a similar outfit but it would be nice to see her showering wearing this lot, if only to see those panties turn more transparent and that white top cling to her boobs.

November 27th, 2010, 07:10 AM	#1274
Knickers1 Vintage Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Northumberland Posts: 2,325 Thanks: 6,268 Thanked 60,408 Times in 2,314 Posts	We have established that the interior pictures are Nicola's house (see last posting); and I believe the alfresco pictures, here, are her house too. Medium2 confirmed, in an earlier posting, that she had used her own name for her modelling assignments. Just imagine, gentlemen, being a keen collector of Spick and Span, in the days when Nicola was modelling and living around the corner from her and knowing her? What a delicious thought. I wonder if she was plagued with admirers during her modelling days?! Nick

November 27th, 2010, 11:31 AM	#1275
mikehobart Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Australia Posts: 18 Thanks: 26 Thanked 67 Times in 9 Posts	This thread really brings back some memories. I remember reading a lot of SPICK, SPAN and BEAUTIFUL BRITONS. They look so innocent today, but at the time we thought they were cutting edge stuff. I suspect nowadays you could run almost identical pictures as advertisements for underwear!

November 27th, 2010, 01:15 PM	#1276
JGW Vintage Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 1,038 Thanks: 2,845 Thanked 25,653 Times in 1,013 Posts	Gorgeous girl. Would have been nice if she had posed in the bath fully clothed, shoes and all. Wonderful to imagine those panties going transparent.

November 30th, 2010, 06:03 AM	#1280
Knickers1 Vintage Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Northumberland Posts: 2,325 Thanks: 6,268 Thanked 60,408 Times in 2,314 Posts	Have ignored the lovely Suan Douglass too long. Found these on the thread archives. Those lacy, black pants are sensational. Just imagine being an onlooker when this session was taking place...hmmmm ! Great legs too ! Credit to manowar1952 for original postings. Nick