Julianna Young Discussion - Page 3

Bill McNeal · February 2nd, 2019, 09:37 PM

That's surprising. She's one of my least favorite pre-2016 playmates and I classify her in the "novelty" category like the Dahm triplets.

Those bolt-ons are so out of proportion and "hard" looking that I don't even like looking at them, quite frankly. She was 33 when she posed, but if you told me she was 45, I'd believe you.

Even though Petra V also has massive breasts, they're real and look much better, and she has a cuter face and was 10 years younger when she posed. No comparison IMO.

chucka · June 20th, 2019, 02:38 PM

I always thought Julianna should have been PMOY

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

February 2nd, 2019, 09:37 PM	#21
Bill McNeal Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 421 Thanks: 1,835 Thanked 5,126 Times in 405 Posts	That's surprising. She's one of my least favorite pre-2016 playmates and I classify her in the "novelty" category like the Dahm triplets. Those bolt-ons are so out of proportion and "hard" looking that I don't even like looking at them, quite frankly. She was 33 when she posed, but if you told me she was 45, I'd believe you. Even though Petra V also has massive breasts, they're real and look much better, and she has a cuter face and was 10 years younger when she posed. No comparison IMO.

June 20th, 2019, 02:38 PM	#22
chucka Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 26 Thanks: 3 Thanked 86 Times in 19 Posts	I always thought Julianna should have been PMOY