Are download links have better quality than tube streams?

[bkemadu]

Are download links have better quality than tube streams?
Sometimes i search the movie titles on google and find them on some tubes but they have mostly in bad quality streams. So in VEF , can we find the equivalent for better quality by downloading? Or what about torrents?

In conclusion I mean is it worth to purchase premium from file hosts to reach better quality than tubes with free?

[m100]

I think you might find that a lot of old movies on streaming sites were uploaded a considerable time ago before high speed uploads were a routine thing. Quality was sacrificed so an upload didn't take a couple of days. Also it depends which streaming sites you are visiting.

[G-Type]

Consider most of what is posted here at VEF to be of better quality. Material on 'Tube'-alike sites is very often shrunk to save filesize.

Whether you are going to invest for a Premium-Hoster is not necessarily the main question since it is policy on VEF that contributors have to provide User-friendly while free links to their files.

However, if you plan to download lots of material, it might indeed be recommendable to sign a deal with one of the hosters whom we label 'preferred', such as 1Fichier for example which many contributors use on this Forum.
.

[Slayer80]

In most cases the rips posted on VEF and other forums are the source for the streaming sites when it comes to material that isn't taken from VOD streaming sites like Brazzers for example.
I found a lot of movies I posted only here on VEF a few days later in worse quality on streaming sites / tubes. G-Type already explained it why streaming sites / tubes (always) are worse.

When it comes to quality original is always best, than come the rips posted in forums and in the end the streaming sites.
Here and there are rips from streaming sites also posted here when no better source is available. But the quality on VEF is never worse than on streaming sites / tubes

[buttsie]

You should already know the answer as the limitations of streaming have been posted enough times in all of your other streaming threads

Year 2018 and why there is no streaming hosts on forums?

A VEF member who has uploaded to streaming site says

Originally Posted by kogi

It's a fair question and the staff has in my opinion given a fair answer as well. Actually, uptobox automatically convert your uploaded files to streaming videos but they simply don't look like the real thing.

That is also my experience

after uploading a few videoes to popular streaming hosts which re-encode the videoes:

If you want the best quality streaming is simply not good enough.

Same goes for 1080 material. There is a big difference between streaming 1080 and the equivalent blu ray rip. I'm talking about full movies though.

Of course, this doesn't matter if you don't care about quality but want accessibility and saving hard disc space. And that is why streaming sites might be an option for random clips or shorter scenes. But for full movies most of us collectors want the best quality, don't we?

Why doesnt the posters try to upload on streaming rather than file hosts?

Originally Posted by buttsie

Theres a major difference in bandwidth consumption - streaming is guess work
Filehosts tell you up front how much - not everyone is on an unlimited fast broadband connection

Theres a clear trickle down effect where the high quality version is uploaded to a filehost
which is then downsized and uploaded onto streaming.

The streaming sites are a world away from filehost forums

Convincing the other main stakeholder - Uploaders - to abandon their large reliable premium filehosts accounts - some of which are paying cash rewards - another substantial hurdle

Us downloaders get what we're given and if we dont like it - we upgrade to premium

From a downloading perspective streaming is easily more dangerous than filehosts
because of their over reliance on the security nightmare adobe flash

Only 892 vulnerabilities listed - becomes vulnerable about every 2-3 months
https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerabi...sh-Player.html

Sick of Flash security holes? HTML5 has its own
Credit: flickr/Sean McCormick

Web browsers and HTML5 technologies bring their own weaknesses to the world of Internet apps

http://www.infoworld.com/article/295...s-its-own.html

last but not least the malvertising attacks of 2015

They peaked on x h a m s t e r at at 45% - 1 in every 2nd ad infected
Nice odds if your not IT savvy and running ad & script blockers

https://www.proofpoint.com/us/threat...-profile-sites

Just a visit to a site like www.nudevista.com
shows streaming - the good bad and very very ugly
Quality isn't a word i'd associate with the platform - its more of a lucky pick system