Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum

Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Information & Help Forum > Help Section > Scanning Feedback

Follow Vintage Erotica Forum on Twitter
Best Porn Sites Meet Our Girls Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-14-2016, 10:04 PM   #1
grabo
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 3
Thanks: 5
Thanked 24 Times in 3 Posts
grabo 100+grabo 100+
Default 1st scan

I'm just starting scanning and editing (and posting) Here's a sample, Tabatha Cash from Color Climax 171. I've had a 20+ year thing for her the color balance isn't ideal between the two pages. The scan is resized and compressed significantly.

I'm not sure what size image I should aim for? Happy to get feedback.



Last edited by grabo; 02-14-2016 at 11:22 PM.. Reason: resize preview
grabo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to grabo For This Useful Post:


Old 02-14-2016, 10:54 PM   #2
seany65
Vintage Member
 
seany65's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,702
Thanks: 11,869
Thanked 12,908 Times in 1,633 Posts
seany65 50000+seany65 50000+seany65 50000+seany65 50000+seany65 50000+seany65 50000+seany65 50000+seany65 50000+seany65 50000+seany65 50000+seany65 50000+
Default

Seems like you've done a good job with it, grabo. Not grainy, we can't see the original dots the image would've been printed with in the mag, and the colour seems fairly neutral.

The 'thumbnail' size you've posted is rather large. I'm pretty sure you'll be asked to re-up the pic with a thumbnail size no bigger than 180x180 (or is it 80x80?) pixels. You should see the option of thumbnail size just above the 'upload now' button if you use imagebam.

Anyway, the image size I usually go for on pics is around 1000 pixels high or thereabouts. This allows the pic to be seen 'full height' without the top and bottom being cut off when I click on the 'Actual size' icon.

I don't know if you do this already, but I scan and save the image as a bitmap, close the scan and when I come to work on the pic I open with the programme I'm using (ability photopaint 2001 or micrografx picture publisher 8) depending on what I want to do first, I then save the file as a bitmap with an extra letter or number so that I don't overwrite the original bitmap. I compare the original with the new version in the 'Slideshow' mode in windows picture viewer, I pause the slideshow and click between the two pics too see if the new version is better. If I decide to do other changes, I do them and save as a third bitmap and re-do the comparison, this time with version 1 and 2. This can go on for quite a while, with someitmes several days between the versions. This has helped a lot with 'problem pics'.
__________________
<-- That's Emma Murphy and I want to be stuck in her front bottom.
seany65 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to seany65 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-14-2016, 11:05 PM   #3
Pepper II
Super Moderator
 
Pepper II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Defending The Constitution
Posts: 5,184
Thanks: 84,882
Thanked 69,719 Times in 4,994 Posts
Pepper II 350000+Pepper II 350000+Pepper II 350000+Pepper II 350000+Pepper II 350000+Pepper II 350000+Pepper II 350000+Pepper II 350000+Pepper II 350000+Pepper II 350000+Pepper II 350000+
Default

Hi, grabo and welcome.

Yes; the maximum allowable thumbnail size here is 180 x 180 so you should rehost the image and edit your post. This scan is about 348k which is small by today's standards. I'd rather see close to 1mb per page for these magazines. The difference would be mostly visible in the text but less compression would yield a better image overall. Everyone has their own method but I scan at 300dpi then resize if necessary. I have noticed different magazines (with poor print quality) sometimes can't handle that much resolution but scanning at higher resolution won't help significantly. Overall, though it looks very good.
Pepper II is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Pepper II For This Useful Post:
Old 02-14-2016, 11:20 PM   #4
grabo
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 3
Thanks: 5
Thanked 24 Times in 3 Posts
grabo 100+grabo 100+
Default

Many thanks for the feedback.

I'm scanning at 300dpi from a high quality magazine copy. I have an image at 1.45MB which is a little better when you zoom in but not really noticeable at basic HD resolution.

The biggest question I have is what resolution to save the final version as? The original merged image is about 4K wide and is only slightly better than the 348k image above.

Only another 120 pages to go and I'll have this issue ready
grabo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to grabo For This Useful Post:
Old 02-15-2016, 12:30 AM   #5
Pepper II
Super Moderator
 
Pepper II's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Defending The Constitution
Posts: 5,184
Thanks: 84,882
Thanked 69,719 Times in 4,994 Posts
Pepper II 350000+Pepper II 350000+Pepper II 350000+Pepper II 350000+Pepper II 350000+Pepper II 350000+Pepper II 350000+Pepper II 350000+Pepper II 350000+Pepper II 350000+Pepper II 350000+
Default

I wouldn't want you to waste your time; CC 171 was already posted here by hartwig. His links are no longer good but I have his archive which I could repost. You're free to scan and post your own, of course but if you have other mags which aren't already here I'd rather see you work on those.
Pepper II is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Pepper II For This Useful Post:
Old 02-17-2016, 05:03 PM   #6
Jism Jim
Sourcer of Smut
 
Jism Jim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,422
Thanks: 48,665
Thanked 201,819 Times in 5,927 Posts
Jism Jim 1000000+Jism Jim 1000000+Jism Jim 1000000+Jism Jim 1000000+Jism Jim 1000000+Jism Jim 1000000+Jism Jim 1000000+Jism Jim 1000000+Jism Jim 1000000+Jism Jim 1000000+Jism Jim 1000000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pepper II View Post
You're free to scan and post your own, of course but if you have other mags which aren't already here I'd rather see you work on those.
I fully agree with Pepper II here. Furthermore I would like to add that your scan looks really good. Posts of this quality are definitely welcome at VEF.
I suggest you find a modus operandi that works best for you. Choose a resolution that gives the best quality:time ratio. As others have already said, in some cases you may want to change the resolution in order to avoid moiré. The compression you use is similar to the one I use, so I think it's fine. For some hints you can check the links in my sig. Good luck!
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Feel free to post my scans to the relevant model threads, but do give credit
Jism Jim is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Jism Jim For This Useful Post:
Old 02-17-2016, 06:17 PM   #7
haVEFun here
Veteran Member
 
haVEFun here's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 1,244
Thanks: 51,233
Thanked 37,399 Times in 1,231 Posts
haVEFun here 175000+haVEFun here 175000+haVEFun here 175000+haVEFun here 175000+haVEFun here 175000+haVEFun here 175000+haVEFun here 175000+haVEFun here 175000+haVEFun here 175000+haVEFun here 175000+haVEFun here 175000+
Default to prevent scanning a magazine that is already on the forum:

Follow-up on these remarks:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pepper II View Post
I wouldn't want you to waste your time; CC 171 was already posted here by hartwig. His links are no longer good but I have his archive which I could repost. You're free to scan and post your own, of course but if you have other mags which aren't already here I'd rather see you work on those.
try using the search function in the blue bar on top of each page: (click on image to enlarge);



for a specific search in a magazine thread use this search option:



in detail:



also, important: please read this thread first:

http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/t30...-function.html

regards, hfh.
__________________
Thanks to all scanners, moderators and posters; keep this forum alive
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Please read and try to follow the VEForum rules

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Avatar: Siân Adey Jones
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
...... R.I.P. Erdnuss
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Last edited by haVEFun here; 02-18-2016 at 03:49 PM.. Reason: text and link added, more info added
haVEFun here is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to haVEFun here For This Useful Post:
Old 02-18-2016, 07:07 PM   #8
grabo
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 3
Thanks: 5
Thanked 24 Times in 3 Posts
grabo 100+grabo 100+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pepper II View Post
I wouldn't want you to waste your time; CC 171 was already posted here by hartwig. His links are no longer good but I have his archive which I could repost. You're free to scan and post your own, of course but if you have other mags which aren't already here I'd rather see you work on those.
Thanks for the suggestions. I did see that cc171 had already been scanned (although the links are on rapidshare) I have found online copies of 171 - not sure if they are copies of hartwig's previous work - which are missing some pages and the original source mag has some graining to it so I thought I'd have a go from a better copy. If you are able to repost that would be useful though.

My 'collection' comprises of 2 magazines in total, both acquired recently so I don't think I'll be able to add to the archive
grabo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to grabo For This Useful Post:
Old 02-22-2016, 11:12 AM   #9
deepsepia
Vintage Member
 
deepsepia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upper left corner
Posts: 2,890
Thanks: 12,239
Thanked 24,600 Times in 2,867 Posts
deepsepia 100000+deepsepia 100000+deepsepia 100000+deepsepia 100000+deepsepia 100000+deepsepia 100000+deepsepia 100000+deepsepia 100000+deepsepia 100000+deepsepia 100000+deepsepia 100000+
Default

Very nice scan. The question of "how big should the scan be" is a vexing one, because it depends on the quality of the original. Scanning a low quality original at very high resolution doesn't get you any more detail, because it isn't there in the original; in fact, scanning at a too high resolution can create a file that looks worse.

What you've produced looks excellent. You can try scanning at a higher resolution to see the difference, but I suspect you're already at or near the sweet spot in quality with the scan you posted. No moire, no grain, looks very good.
deepsepia is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to deepsepia For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 06:51 AM.






vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.1 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.