Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum

Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Classic Models > Softcore Models > Softcore Models Discussion

Follow Vintage Erotica Forum on Twitter
Best Porn Sites Meet Our Girls Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices
Softcore Models Discussion For all chat and discussions on Vintage Models


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-17-2017, 06:34 AM   #1
hirbel3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 8
Thanks: 16
Thanked 18 Times in 3 Posts
hirbel3 0hirbel3 0
Default Pandora Peaks

Did she take out her implants -is the last pic an actual one of her?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kotenockin2 View Post
Another mix of Pandora with pic from present

hirbel3 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to hirbel3 For This Useful Post:


Old 02-19-2017, 08:38 AM   #2
urzu6
Senior Member
 
urzu6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 166
Thanks: 238
Thanked 1,980 Times in 153 Posts
urzu6 10000+urzu6 10000+urzu6 10000+urzu6 10000+urzu6 10000+urzu6 10000+urzu6 10000+urzu6 10000+urzu6 10000+urzu6 10000+urzu6 10000+
Default So few professional sets ???

The first time I see Pandora was on Striptease. I am still amazing not only for her hot body and big boobs, but also by her beautiful face and green eyes. =O

But I wonder why she got so few professional photoshoots, she totally deserved better pics. I mean, apart of the low quality, her locations were mainly regular backyard gardens and cheap hotel rooms.

She still looks gorgeous but by the fame she got I think she was "wasted" on her best years on almost candid quality sets. Do you know any reason for this ?
Here I post two examples to make my point.

urzu6 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to urzu6 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-14-2018, 11:21 PM   #3
jimmyz22
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 8
Thanks: 89
Thanked 12 Times in 4 Posts
jimmyz22 0
Default

That's her....no big boobies
jimmyz22 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jimmyz22 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-16-2018, 04:27 PM   #4
salpecam
Member
 
salpecam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Leeds, England
Posts: 56
Thanks: 2,402
Thanked 391 Times in 49 Posts
salpecam 1000+salpecam 1000+salpecam 1000+salpecam 1000+salpecam 1000+salpecam 1000+salpecam 1000+salpecam 1000+salpecam 1000+salpecam 1000+salpecam 1000+
Default

tragic... would have suited growing old with them still in situ
salpecam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2018, 05:14 PM   #5
ellias
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 132
Thanks: 2,608
Thanked 708 Times in 126 Posts
ellias 2500+ellias 2500+ellias 2500+ellias 2500+ellias 2500+ellias 2500+ellias 2500+ellias 2500+ellias 2500+ellias 2500+ellias 2500+
Default

she was "wasted" on her best years on almost candid quality sets. Do you know any reason for this ?

I belonged to her club in the old days, early 90s, and all her images were of very low quality. Even when cameras made an enormous leap in quality, her pics were still lousy as she had her friend "photographer" use the same dumpy camera with low specs. She never used proper lighting, preferring to use the highest ASA rating on the digital camera which produced grainy results. When she switched to her new club alliance her pics were still amateurish in nature. The reason.... cheaper that way.

Always follow the money for most answers in life.
ellias is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ellias For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 07:50 AM.






vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.1 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.