Why So Many Girls?

[Brooksie]

In my working days I was a reasonably attractive candidate: well dressed, middle management position with good income and earning prospects, tall, reasonably good looking, in good shape, well educated. I was able to date a variety of women and most would sleep with me if a relationship seemed possible.

I knew you had it goin' on!

I ran across two nymphos - a '9' who admitted to sleeping with over 500 men and a '3' in college who thought that "Fleet Week" was the high point of the year. Both passed on a strain of herpes to me. Frankly, the sex was better with some of the other women.

It's often been my feeling (opinion at least), that those women who are highly promiscuous are usually so not because they are driven by biology (as with men) or by 'libido' generally (in the way men would understand it), and are much more driven psychologically - for a number of reasons - daddy issues, a sense of power from being able to do it, the ego boost they get from proving how many men want to have sex with them, etc. Actual sexual arousal or pleasure I think comes second to those other things. I'm simplifying, but you get the point.

Herpes... man. I'm glad I never got any little 'thank yous' like that.

I would guess that if you aren't getting any, you are fishing in the wrong ponds.

Oh - I didn't mean to imply I was out 'fishing' and not having much luck. I hung up my rod years ago (gave up would be a more accurate term ). Though much of what I said would have applied to my experiences back then.

Try dating available women in your income and social class. Seek advice from female friends and relatives.

Never really found women's advice very useful. They usually advised from either an idealistic perspective (be yourself and people will like you) or not useful to men perspective (people's default is already to want to sleep with you).

Be aware that the women higher on the scale tend to like sex more, except for the prostitutes. I don't know where you live, but a woman's libido is interwoven with her self esteem and self image. So, a 4 or 5 will only be interested in a 5 or 6 who seems trustworthy and to have sufficient financial resources, but she'll put out for 7-10s in hopes of getting lucky.

This is very true and can't be said enough. Men tend to trade down for instant sex, while women seem to trade up.

If you are only interested in the sex, buy it from a provider. It is much less messy that way.

Nah, I always liked the affection and genuine compliment that came with someone wanting to have sex with you. Without it sex just seems perfunctory, and age thankfully deadens the drive to seek it out (experience too?) I'd rather just turn to our friend The VEF when feeling like I need a little purely sexual companionship .

[Brooksie]

A different time back then.

Aint that the truth!

Promiscuous? Sure. A nympho? Can't really say as I only met her a few times. And banged her at least two of those times. I guess if she's not a nympho, she's pretty darn close.

Hmm... that would be a tough call to make without knowing her better.

Maybe a lot of people would do that, but that isn't really a very honorable thing to do.

True, but if the women loved random sex, it wouldn't really be bad either would it? I mean, would a woman who was bored of being with a guy who just wanted sex be bad for giving his number to female friends who found him attractive and also just wanted random sex? They would all end up getting what they wanted.

Ummmm, think I'll disagree. I like highly sexual women. And I don't mind sharing a woman in the right situation. The main point for me is honesty. If they are more than willing to talk about their interests honestly then I'm usually willing to accomodate whatever flips their boat.

Hmm... we come down to the difference between highly sexual and nymphomaniac again. A woman could be highly sexual and still happy with one partner in a loving relationship. I would say that a woman with nymphomania would be unable to control her compulsions and / or stay faithful. If you have a more open relationship with honesty and clarity I guess that's fine, but it would also indicate at least some form of self-regulation and control.
If I were in that situation (which I've never been - though I know a few people who have gone down something of the same road with varying results), I think I could only agree if she (the female) utilised her greater mate selection opportunities to assist the male to also 'indulge' so to speak. In the name of fairness I mean.

[Sirch]

I echo the OP. I'm amazed how many gorgeous women do porn. I do think it comes down to money for the majority of them. Especially in Europe were there's less opportunity for women. Same can be said in the Americas really.

Why not use your best assets to your advantage. Especially today when it's not quite as taboo as it was in the 60's and 70's. It's funny in some ways it's more taboo for men. Men in porn, men looking at porn. Society still sees them as socially unstable, perverts or abusers of women.

There's still a strong stigma around the world regarding sex and nudity. I would argue it's gotten worse in Europe sadly influenced by US standards and norms. The more excepting humans become with their own bodies the more men and women will feel comfortable exploring their sexuality in the open.

Bottom line we are sexual creatures, we don't have mating seasons. It's something most want to celebrate in private and in public when allowed.

[9876543210]

Brooksie,

Originally Posted by Brooksie

Hmm... that would be a tough call to make without knowing her better.

Yeah, as I said, I only remember meeting her three times. Not really enough info to make that call.

True, but if the women loved random sex, it wouldn't really be bad either would it? I mean, would a woman who was bored of being with a guy who just wanted sex be bad for giving his number to female friends who found him attractive and also just wanted random sex? They would all end up getting what they wanted.

Ummmmm, let me put it this way. In the case of the woman I described, she was an exec for one of the Big 3 in Detroit. So a certain amount of discretion was probably a necessity. I can't say for sure but I doubt if she would have kept her job very long if it became well known she had a healthy sexual appetite. So, in her case, I'd say that discretion was the better part of valor.

But, I have known a few women that might not be miffed by such a suggestion.

I had another girlfriend for about a year and a half (probably mid 70's) whom I would definitely classify as a nymph. To this day, she is in my top 10 at least 4 times for some of our experiences: my first real threesome which lasted all night with her roommate, then another threesome with one of her sisters, then another threesome with her other sister and, lastly, a gang bang she did with five of my friends. She was a definite nymph and we had one heck of a good time.

Wouldn't mind running into her again.

Hmm... we come down to the difference between highly sexual and nymphomaniac again. A woman could be highly sexual and still happy with one partner in a loving relationship. I would say that a woman with nymphomania would be unable to control her compulsions and / or stay faithful. If you have a more open relationship with honesty and clarity I guess that's fine, but it would also indicate at least some form of self-regulation and control.

As to your first statement, I agree. My current girlfriend (in her 50's) is highly sexual but prefers monogamy. If I were still a youngster we'd be banging away almost nightly. But, alas, such is not the case. Just can't do that in your 60's (at least I can't damn it). So I've been working on her to expand her repertoire a bit and try a few new things. She's a great sexual partner so I really want her to try some things she's never done.

As far as controlling their compulsions? Thats probably correct. The second lady I mentioned was always faithful to me as long as we were honest with each other. But the relationship only lasted a year and a half or so, so she probably did need more than I could provide. Good time while it lasted though.

If I were in that situation (which I've never been - though I know a few people who have gone down something of the same road with varying results), I think I could only agree if she (the female) utilised her greater mate selection opportunities to assist the male to also 'indulge' so to speak. In the name of fairness I mean.

I think I'm lucky in that the Little Green Monster doesn't hold much sway over me. I've always enjoyed sharing a lady with someone else if the lady is into it. For me, it just makes things more interesting and long lasting. But thats just me. That won't work for most people I've known.

[ponky]

Quick answer.

Just two, sometimes and somewhat combined:

- exhibitionism of exhibitionists;
- form of slavery, victims of unrighteous system.

---------------------------

Full answer... (sorry, this can't be short)

Why so many girls do it? Money? Could it be more discreet? Prostitution?

There's often a mix of exhibitionism and slavery (speaking simplified), but almost always second is represented with at least 95% (if we can talk in %) based on my experience. Pure(r) exhibitionism would be expressed in some other way, needless to say.

I'll try to explain via example.

Giorgio Grandi said that Arwen Gold's incomings are increased nearly 4.5 times per year since she start as a star of TWM agency; part of incomings she get thanks to her work for Legalporno in both periods (before and after she joined TWM). See quote (Giorgio Grandi):

7 month at TWM provided to Arwen Gold gained in in the initial 4 month about 50% more then what she gained in all the previous year. I make it more easy: if in the previous 12 months she gained 1000 USD, with TWM she gained 1500 in only 4 months. After 7 month, we was already able to provide her as much money as we guaranteed in her exclusive contract.

So - 1000 USD for whole 2015. ONE THOUSAND for year. In total. For published and filmed scenes (49 just for LP in 2014-2016). For scenes with DAP, TAP (double and triple anal), pissing, piss-drinking, gangbangs...

OK, Arwen is LP superstar now and let's say that she could continue with new trend and get 4.5 thousand per year. But - other girls can't get more. And this is very small sum of money in every country, in every aspect. Why they film it at all? Where's the catch?

Did you notice that actresses have public profiles now at Twitter, FB, Instagram... and they don't hide themselves as earlier? Did you notice pictures they post there? Expensive clothes, iPhones, vacations, landscapes of many famous cities - maybe unusually often Arabian ones? Now is little clearer?

They use porn just as advertisement for they professional skills, and profession is - prostitution.

Just to make story round: Legalporno pays girls usually up to 500 euros per scene (so high ammount is just for 1st anal, 1st DP, DAP gangbang... or for stars) but agency takes about half, they have to pay tickets to Praha or St. P., hotel... That's why they usually make several scenes in row. I'm pretty sure that Giorgio was too careful, I believe that girl can count on at least 100 euros per scene net (Netto), probably 200 per scene in a row. But in best case scenario superstar Arwen could collect 12 thousands euros max for 49+ scenes and 2 years. Luxury, travels, cars... from 12k? NO. Impossible.

Producers have interests - they get very cheap girls, so earning is more or less clear. Sometimes they could pay some real model as Maddy O'Reilly or Simony Diamond to get better public image but over 90% of girls are not at that model range, they can become production home internal "superstars" at best.

Interest of users of escort/prostitution services are in easy informing and getting contact.

Interest of girls... Well, on longer terms - there isn't such a thing.