T*en@ge $ex wonderings - Page 2

half a witt · August 18th, 2008, 04:21 PM

Back to basics - you have two editions I have not - teenage sex 7 & 8.
Your link only showed 3&4.
Could you please post.

Again you mentioned many others you have read. If you still have them, and can scan, they would be appreciated.

I have just posted what I found on another forum to
http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/t13...-sex-no-1.html

Go and enjoy ...

**JollyHumper** · August 19th, 2008, 08:42 AM

I have a feeling I started an uninented discussion about kiddyporn.

My point was only, there are picture of girls clearly below eighteen in these to editions. One picture. There are no sexual action in the picture, there are no men in the picture, no spread legs or asses in the air, it's just young girls standing there smiling to the camera.
They're not pornographic.

But they're there and they're in a magazine which is plain hardcore with the name teenage in it. (That was just a thought; how innocent can such an innocent picture be understood in a HC-mag from denmark, and nothing else)

Basically I was just wandering about the Teen@ge S£x timeline (which I've now found) and wether some of the very first mags
have been/still are available somewhere on the net.

I DO NOT accuse anyone of anything regarding kiddieporn.
There's no doubt CeeCee was heavily involved in it in the early seventies, but that does not apply to the mags I was talking about. at all.

Sorry for starting this discussion, it was not my intention at all.

Regards
Jolly

**JollyHumper** · August 19th, 2008, 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by half a witt

Back to basics - you have two editions I have not - teenage sex 7 & 8.
Your link only showed 3&4.
Could you please post.

I'll dig them out :-)

Jolly

morbius · August 24th, 2008, 06:45 PM

The pictures of underage girls appear to be reproduced from naturist publications, which I think are still legal in the US and UK. Whether taking them out of original context and putting them in a porn mag makes a difference I don't know.

**Leprechaun** · August 25th, 2008, 10:08 AM

That's correct. Just some nudism pics. The type of photos many of you will find in your family photo albums too - and absolutely no reason to construct a drama!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

August 18th, 2008, 04:21 PM	#11
half a witt Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 135 Thanks: 293 Thanked 2,156 Times in 119 Posts	Back to basics - you have two editions I have not - teenage sex 7 & 8. Your link only showed 3&4. Could you please post. Again you mentioned many others you have read. If you still have them, and can scan, they would be appreciated. I have just posted what I found on another forum to http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/t13...-sex-no-1.html Go and enjoy ...

August 19th, 2008, 08:42 AM	#12
JollyHumper Vintage Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: North of the land of Danes Posts: 832 Thanks: 9,631 Thanked 17,951 Times in 804 Posts	I have a feeling I started an uninented discussion about kiddyporn. My point was only, there are picture of girls clearly below eighteen in these to editions. One picture. There are no sexual action in the picture, there are no men in the picture, no spread legs or asses in the air, it's just young girls standing there smiling to the camera. They're not pornographic. But they're there and they're in a magazine which is plain hardcore with the name teenage in it. (That was just a thought; how innocent can such an innocent picture be understood in a HC-mag from denmark, and nothing else) Basically I was just wandering about the Teen@ge S£x timeline (which I've now found) and wether some of the very first mags have been/still are available somewhere on the net. I DO NOT accuse anyone of anything regarding kiddieporn. There's no doubt CeeCee was heavily involved in it in the early seventies, but that does not apply to the mags I was talking about. at all. Sorry for starting this discussion, it was not my intention at all. Regards Jolly

August 24th, 2008, 06:45 PM	#14
morbius Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 16 Thanks: 9 Thanked 52 Times in 14 Posts	The pictures of underage girls appear to be reproduced from naturist publications, which I think are still legal in the US and UK. Whether taking them out of original context and putting them in a porn mag makes a difference I don't know.

August 25th, 2008, 10:08 AM	#15
Leprechaun Veteran Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Germany Posts: 5,013 Thanks: 23,651 Thanked 77,923 Times in 4,988 Posts	That's correct. Just some nudism pics. The type of photos many of you will find in your family photo albums too - and absolutely no reason to construct a drama!