|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Mystery Corner Here you will find the Mystery Boxes containing the older unsolved requests. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
June 27th, 2015, 09:34 PM | #1 | |
Maestro
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Sin City
Posts: 4,505
Thanks: 26,111
Thanked 83,653 Times in 4,342 Posts
|
[MB followup] "Sandy" - Sally from Pr1v@t€ magazine 88
Followup thread for 2011 MB girl here
Quote:
A model thread has been started for this Box babe with nothing more than a first name from one of her spreads. Not sure it counts as a solve but presented here for your consideration and debate.
__________________
Check out the Electric Blue
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. . And why not help ID these unknown To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. from the series. |
|
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Immy For This Useful Post: |
|
June 28th, 2015, 01:49 AM | #2 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sunny South Florida
Posts: 7,852
Thanks: 163,934
Thanked 119,241 Times in 7,641 Posts
|
...not to mention the thread was started just today. I'm reluctant to call this a solve so I've quoted Immy's post into the box post and we'll keep this thread alive for further discussion.
|
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Pepper II For This Useful Post: |
June 28th, 2015, 02:11 PM | #3 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nyetimber - West Sussex - England
Posts: 1,306
Thanks: 10,569
Thanked 89,347 Times in 1,408 Posts
|
The poster has done a lot of detective work on these threads looking for comparisons to UK top shelf mags and in my opinion and many others he is doing sterling work. The object of this forum is to post pictures and the details offered, sparse though they may be, are most likely the closest we will get to an ID. Surely it is best to give his posts exposure, that way full IDs may come in the fullness of time...
__________________
Regards Meglos "We Must Know, We Will Know". David Hilbert 1862 - 1943 |
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Meglos For This Useful Post: |
June 28th, 2015, 03:35 PM | #4 | |
Vintage Idiot
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: History
Posts: 22,131
Thanks: 226,706
Thanked 356,700 Times in 21,625 Posts
|
Quote:
Following that logic we would move all content that has at least one name out of MIR & the mystery boxes and into the main parts of vef. Then much of the id-discovery/resolution process would occur in model threads themselves. Is that a fair summary of what you're advocating? |
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to effCup For This Useful Post: |
June 28th, 2015, 10:25 PM | #5 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sunny South Florida
Posts: 7,852
Thanks: 163,934
Thanked 119,241 Times in 7,641 Posts
|
Meglos is correct in that there's more exposure in the model threads than there is here. But this is the Model ID Request section and our purpose, although related, is not the same as the model thread sections.
|
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Pepper II For This Useful Post: |
June 29th, 2015, 02:45 PM | #6 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nyetimber - West Sussex - England
Posts: 1,306
Thanks: 10,569
Thanked 89,347 Times in 1,408 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
Regards Meglos "We Must Know, We Will Know". David Hilbert 1862 - 1943 |
|
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Meglos For This Useful Post: |
June 29th, 2015, 04:07 PM | #7 | |
Vintage Idiot
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: History
Posts: 22,131
Thanks: 226,706
Thanked 356,700 Times in 21,625 Posts
|
Quote:
Sandy from Escort 09-03, 1989. Sally from Private 88, 1987, see here. No third set & no pattern for name. I'm simply trying to understand the logic of your advocated position. If it's not the case that all models where we have just a single name can become model threads, then it becomes far more arbitrary: we allow only some models with just first names to become threads, but not others. In my view that arbitrariness is kind of correct, but with the important rider that we allow some model threads with just first names only where we've first collectively done our best to try and find a better name/id but have failed. In general we want model threads to have their best-known-as professional handle, not just the name some member happens to choose for whatever reason and quite possibly selected at random or the first name they found. "Sandy" is not a particularly good id for a classic model/pornstar. Nor is "Sally". They are insufficiently distinctive. If these sets had been posted in a MIR query I don't think we would be rushing to mark them as solved because we'd be hoping to find a better name for her id. Last edited by effCup; June 30th, 2015 at 12:52 PM.. Reason: typo |
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to effCup For This Useful Post: |
June 30th, 2015, 12:50 PM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nyetimber - West Sussex - England
Posts: 1,306
Thanks: 10,569
Thanked 89,347 Times in 1,408 Posts
|
IDS and Confusion
I do see what you are saying, none of us want the forum to become a mess. Maybe another section could be constructed for these tenuous IDs so that their various appearances can be consolidated pending a possible distinctive ID. Would this idea create a lot of work for the Mods ? I appreciate that running this tip top forum is no picnic at the best of times...
__________________
Regards Meglos "We Must Know, We Will Know". David Hilbert 1862 - 1943 |
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Meglos For This Useful Post: |
June 30th, 2015, 01:12 PM | #9 | |
Vintage Idiot
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: History
Posts: 22,131
Thanks: 226,706
Thanked 356,700 Times in 21,625 Posts
|
Quote:
MIR is, for the most part, just a temporary funnel, directing posters with content to the correct model threads. But some content ends up staying longer in MIR because of difficulties finding an id, finding (or sometimes creating) the right model thread outlet. The general accuracy of the results from MIR is advantageous, reducing the amount of work of mods in other sections who would otherwise have to spend even more time tidying up model duplications & debates over such/ids/names, etc. Time invested in MIR trying to find a good id/name also saves mods in those other sections from some of that bother. Fair question, I dunno. Might you perhaps expect the folk who spend time in MIR to also spend time in this second area, looking for ids for the models there? In that sense it seems to me like rather needless duplication, a bit like simply making a MIR #2. |
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to effCup For This Useful Post: |
July 1st, 2015, 01:01 AM | #10 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sunny South Florida
Posts: 7,852
Thanks: 163,934
Thanked 119,241 Times in 7,641 Posts
|
I appreciate everyone's point of view but all this discussion is off-topic in a request thread. I encourage you all to continue in one of the stickies I created for this purpose. Thanks.
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Pepper II For This Useful Post: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|