Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum

Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Information & Help Forum > Help Section

Follow Vintage Erotica Forum on Twitter
Best Porn Sites Meet Our Girls Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices
Help Section If you have technical problems or questions then post or look for answers here.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-24-2014, 03:50 AM   #61
kogi
Archduke of The Classics
 
kogi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Icarus aspiring to greatness.
Posts: 4,386
Thanks: 10,235
Thanked 103,524 Times in 4,305 Posts
kogi 500000+kogi 500000+kogi 500000+kogi 500000+kogi 500000+kogi 500000+kogi 500000+kogi 500000+kogi 500000+kogi 500000+kogi 500000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbobnobody View Post
The "moral" comment, was directed towards VEF...not the poster
Seems like it's saying that a person's posts are good enough for here,
but not them. Know what I mean?
I'm not sure if I do bob. I fail to see the problem. And I do doubt that the VEF staff is united in a moral outlook considering the "objective" moral character of the various transgressors. In other words, who deserve to have their posts and who don't after they are banned.

I believe the analogy between VEF and sports breaks down due to difference in utility or value for the VEF community as a whole in contrast to cheating records that serve no purpose. Do you see a problem in accepting that a person's posts are good for the VEF community as a whole while still admitting that person has to go? If banning was completely arbitrary I would agree with you but banning of senior member ranks and up is never up to an individual moderator. For good reasons obviously. Most people that end up banned only have themselves to blame.

To put in bluntly: Thank you for your posts but you seem unable to follow the rules and you don't heed advice so now you have to have a word with the headsman.

As for preferred links. You are right. I could simply have said: "updated with working links."
__________________
Dead links? PM me for an update.

And please let me know if you find anything wrong with the movie (e.g. title, cast, incomplete)
kogi is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to kogi For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2014, 04:14 AM   #62
bigbobnobody
Vintage Member
 
bigbobnobody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: not here
Posts: 2,866
Thanks: 4,408
Thanked 88,462 Times in 3,009 Posts
bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by winebeavis View Post
So, what is the percentage of those who are banned that still have their posts up?

I'm sure your observations are more precise than those who would use lesser means, such as the actual data, to make such contrary claims.

Mmm....you tell me. I just use my eyes. What is the actual data?

Last edited by bigbobnobody; 06-24-2014 at 04:22 AM..
bigbobnobody is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to bigbobnobody For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2014, 04:20 AM   #63
bigbobnobody
Vintage Member
 
bigbobnobody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: not here
Posts: 2,866
Thanks: 4,408
Thanked 88,462 Times in 3,009 Posts
bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kogi View Post
I'm not sure if I do bob. I fail to see the problem. And I do doubt that the VEF staff is united in a moral outlook considering the "objective" moral character of the various transgressors. In other words, who deserve to have their posts and who don't after they are banned.

I believe the analogy between VEF and sports breaks down due to difference in utility or value for the VEF community as a whole in contrast to cheating records that serve no purpose. Do you see a problem in accepting that a person's posts are good for the VEF community as a whole while still admitting that person has to go? If banning was completely arbitrary I would agree with you but banning of senior member ranks and up is never up to an individual moderator. For good reasons obviously. Most people that end up banned only have themselves to blame.

To put in bluntly: Thank you for your posts but you seem unable to follow the rules and you don't heed advice so now you have to have a word with the headsman.

As for preferred links. You are right. I could simply have said: "updated with working links."
Well said I have no doubts that each individual that ends up getting
banned from VEF, is dealt with....well....individually, as they should. Their
posts, from what's been said here, I guess is dealt with in a similar way too.
As each is come across I mean. Errrrr.....that didn't come out quite right
said like that did it? ....sheez......I best stop lol. Good explanation though.
bigbobnobody is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to bigbobnobody For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32 PM.






vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.1 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2018 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.