Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum
Home
Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Classic Models > Softcore Models > Softcore Models Discussion
Best Porn Sites Live Sex Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices
Softcore Models Discussion For all chat and discussions on Vintage Models


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old May 23rd, 2013, 04:29 PM   #1
Marialva
Vintage Member
 
Marialva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 333
Thanks: 19,689
Thanked 13,138 Times in 331 Posts
Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+
Default Patricia Farinelli

In the 1997 Cyber ​​Chat Live Patti said to have made an extra in the movie Wholly Moses and participated in two TV dating games in the 80s. Is anyone aware of this? There are any videos or pictures of it?
Marialva is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Marialva For This Useful Post:


Old July 21st, 2013, 12:14 PM   #2
Marialva
Vintage Member
 
Marialva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 333
Thanks: 19,689
Thanked 13,138 Times in 331 Posts
Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+Marialva 50000+
Default Fan Testimony

I found this interesting testimony on Patti's PB page:


Anonymous wrote
I'll tell the story of the first time I "met" Patti. We were in the summer of 2001. I was 15 and was rummaging through old stuff for donation in the basement, as my mom asked me. While I was looking for some toys, I accidentally found a Playboy magazine with the date of December 1981. But I confess I wasn't too excited, I thought it was just an old and uninteresting magazine from my dad. Besides, I thought women in 1981 wouldn't be nothing special. I just knew girls from recent times: fake blonde, skinny and with silicone. However, out of curiosity, I opened the central page to see how girls were twenty years ago. When I open the magazine, my jaw dropped. I couldn't believe what I was seeing. Ahead of me was the most perfect woman I've ever saw. I stayed fixed in those boobs, so big and natural, as well as the pubic area, with hair so thick and fluffy. I was stunned. I turned the page to look the other photos. I never saw anything like that. The beauty and sensuality of that woman had me spellbound. I stood there enjoying that beauty almost an hour, until my mom came home. Fortunately I had enough time to relieve my "tension". I put the magazine in the same place and left the basement. Since then Patti is my number one Playmate.
Marialva is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 26th, 2017, 07:21 PM   #3
BUSTYFAN1947
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Raleigh, N.C.
Posts: 35
Thanks: 2
Thanked 182 Times in 26 Posts
BUSTYFAN1947 500+BUSTYFAN1947 500+BUSTYFAN1947 500+BUSTYFAN1947 500+BUSTYFAN1947 500+BUSTYFAN1947 500+BUSTYFAN1947 500+BUSTYFAN1947 500+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeroyLargeCar View Post
The first is new or not visible (X) in the thread - part of the library/ladder series of pics. The next is the full version of one that Mr. Marxz posted on 09-11-2008. The last is from some recent convention, possibly Glamourcon, year unknown.



What happened to the 36DDD bust? Darn sure seems to have gotten smaller?
BUSTYFAN1947 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 26th, 2017, 08:55 PM   #4
spazarino
Vintage Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 647
Thanks: 160
Thanked 5,968 Times in 590 Posts
spazarino 25000+spazarino 25000+spazarino 25000+spazarino 25000+spazarino 25000+spazarino 25000+spazarino 25000+spazarino 25000+spazarino 25000+spazarino 25000+spazarino 25000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BUSTYFAN1947 View Post
What happened to the 36DDD bust? Darn sure seems to have gotten smaller?
Back pain and scoliosis, perhaps. Similar to why Debra Jo Fondren cut her looong hair..it was a strain on her neck.

Patty's 56 and only 5'3"....that's a lot of mass to carry when you're short and 21 (when she posed)...far easier to carry then comapred to now.
spazarino is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to spazarino For This Useful Post:
Old October 21st, 2018, 12:07 PM   #5
BarbEberlyFan
Member
 
BarbEberlyFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 29
Thanks: 705
Thanked 590 Times in 23 Posts
BarbEberlyFan 2500+BarbEberlyFan 2500+BarbEberlyFan 2500+BarbEberlyFan 2500+BarbEberlyFan 2500+BarbEberlyFan 2500+BarbEberlyFan 2500+BarbEberlyFan 2500+BarbEberlyFan 2500+BarbEberlyFan 2500+BarbEberlyFan 2500+
Default

"I wasn't too happy with them [the photographers] because they emphasized my breasts so much in my opinion."

This comment has always flabbergasted me. Here's a woman with a 36-inch bust, posing in what was then the most famous nudie magazine in the world, and she's surprised because they emphasized her breasts. I've read a couple of similar comments from other Playmates. Does it strike you that some of these women are either terribly naive or not too bright?
BarbEberlyFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to BarbEberlyFan For This Useful Post:
Old October 21st, 2018, 01:56 PM   #6
spazarino
Vintage Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 647
Thanks: 160
Thanked 5,968 Times in 590 Posts
spazarino 25000+spazarino 25000+spazarino 25000+spazarino 25000+spazarino 25000+spazarino 25000+spazarino 25000+spazarino 25000+spazarino 25000+spazarino 25000+spazarino 25000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BarbEberlyFan View Post
"I wasn't too happy with them [the photographers] because they emphasized my breasts so much in my opinion."

This comment has always flabbergasted me. Here's a woman with a 36-inch bust, posing in what was then the most famous nudie magazine in the world, and she's surprised because they emphasized her breasts. I've read a couple of similar comments from other Playmates. Does it strike you that some of these women are either terribly naive or not too bright?
Or maybe they think their other parts were also worthy of photographic attention?
spazarino is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to spazarino For This Useful Post:
Old October 21st, 2018, 05:21 PM   #7
ruderberry
Vintage Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 622
Thanks: 839
Thanked 10,829 Times in 618 Posts
ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BarbEberlyFan View Post
"I wasn't too happy with them [the photographers] because they emphasized my breasts so much in my opinion."

This comment has always flabbergasted me. Here's a woman with a 36-inch bust, posing in what was then the most famous nudie magazine in the world, and she's surprised because they emphasized her breasts.
Yes, at first glance her reaction to the photographs appears innocent and naive, especially since her amazing 36Fs were natural. You might expect a Playmate not to be surprised that her tremendous bustiness would steal the show.

But only four or five years before she posed for Playboy, Patti Farinelli was mocked and taunted by her schoolmates as "Flatty Patti" because she had no boobs to speak of. Then, when her bust-line developed at a rapid rate, the same bullies made fun of her enormous frontage.

So I think there are reasons why she was sensitive about being defined by her tits alone, and being seen as nothing more than a "busty bimbo". She had a fine ass also, but this got little attention in the pictorial. That's understandable, of course, but Miss December 1981 seemed to think a more balanced presentation of her physical charms could have been provided to readers.
ruderberry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 21st, 2018, 05:27 PM   #8
banquomerc
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 439
Thanks: 12,916
Thanked 3,000 Times in 408 Posts
banquomerc 10000+banquomerc 10000+banquomerc 10000+banquomerc 10000+banquomerc 10000+banquomerc 10000+banquomerc 10000+banquomerc 10000+banquomerc 10000+banquomerc 10000+banquomerc 10000+
Default

I've always wanted to have the chance to give her a balanced presentation from my overrated but particular set of skills, but alas she knows not.
banquomerc is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to banquomerc For This Useful Post:
Old October 21st, 2018, 07:47 PM   #9
KissArmy
Vintage Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,124
Thanks: 21,042
Thanked 12,356 Times in 1,105 Posts
KissArmy 50000+KissArmy 50000+KissArmy 50000+KissArmy 50000+KissArmy 50000+KissArmy 50000+KissArmy 50000+KissArmy 50000+KissArmy 50000+KissArmy 50000+KissArmy 50000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ruderberry View Post
Yes, at first glance her reaction to the photographs appears innocent and naive, especially since her amazing 36Fs were natural. You might expect a Playmate not to be surprised that her tremendous bustiness would steal the show.

But only four or five years before she posed for Playboy, Patti Farinelli was mocked and taunted by her schoolmates as "Flatty Patti" because she had no boobs to speak of. Then, when her bust-line developed at a rapid rate, the same bullies made fun of her enormous frontage.

So I think there are reasons why she was sensitive about being defined by her tits alone, and being seen as nothing more than a "busty bimbo". She had a fine ass also, but this got little attention in the pictorial. That's understandable, of course, but Miss December 1981 seemed to think a more balanced presentation of her physical charms could have been provided to readers.
IMHO, the Playboy photographer did the best he could with what he had. He had a playmate with a tan, a magnificent set of tits, and a beautiful, thick, dark bush. The photos highlighted those, and because of that, Patti is one of the all-time PB favorites. I think the Lady Doth Protest Too Much.
KissArmy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to KissArmy For This Useful Post:
Old October 22nd, 2018, 10:11 AM   #10
ruderberry
Vintage Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 622
Thanks: 839
Thanked 10,829 Times in 618 Posts
ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KissArmy View Post
IMHO, the Playboy photographer did the best he could with what he had. He had a playmate with a tan, a magnificent set of tits, and a beautiful, thick, dark bush. The photos highlighted those, and because of that, Patti is one of the all-time PB favorites. I think the Lady Doth Protest Too Much.
Her comments about the pictorial were made in 1997, during a Cyber-Club chat. She said that, overall, "she really liked" the photographs, but that a few of them caused her some embarrassment. It's not surprising that, 16 years later, her perspective had changed a bit.

She added that, if she had been a born-again Christian in 1981, she wouldn't have posed for Playboy.

None of this changes the reality that Playboy readers would have felt short-changed if the focus of the pictorial had been anything other than Miss December's glorious jugs. Their marketability was underlined in the December 1983 edition, when Patti featured in a double-page subscription advertisement.
ruderberry is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to ruderberry For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 03:29 AM.






vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.1 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.