|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar |
Vintage Erotica Maximum date of the content allowed to be posted here is 1995. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
November 23rd, 2010, 04:18 PM | #1271 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,038
Thanks: 2,845
Thanked 25,654 Times in 1,013 Posts
|
The delectable Roz Stuart. Here she hoists up her skirt to reveal her panties - and it is nice to see the outline of her suspender beneath the material of the panties. And of course she unbuttons her blouse to show off her beautiful brassiere. Stocking tops are on view as ever. And she is clearly very happy to be photographed with her clothes in such a sexy state of disarray. I mean she would not go down to the supermarket like that. She did do a wet set in a similar outfit but it would be nice to see her showering wearing this lot, if only to see those panties turn more transparent and that white top cling to her boobs.
|
The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to JGW For This Useful Post: |
November 23rd, 2010, 07:28 PM | #1272 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,038
Thanks: 2,845
Thanked 25,654 Times in 1,013 Posts
|
Jenny Spencer again. There's always something particularly alluring about a pretty girl dressed only in underwear and a loosely fitting shirt top in the countryside. And from her expression she obviously feels admired by the photographer. KH again maybe. Anyway a lovely view of Jenny's breasts - and because she is kneeling down, more detail can be seen in the picture, the model being closer to the camera. Jenny's suspender belt and panties look terrific.
Last edited by JGW; November 25th, 2010 at 06:53 PM.. |
The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to JGW For This Useful Post: |
November 27th, 2010, 04:25 AM | #1273 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 6,268
Thanked 60,410 Times in 2,314 Posts
|
For Medium 2 and other interested parties.
Confirmation of Nicola's home. The attached pic and narrative confirm my theory to be correct. Much of the photography was, in deed, carried out at Nicola's own home. I suspect this would have made a photo session much easier for her, having two young girls to deal with. I would imagine Marie, Laura (Brenda) and others would have lived close by and would have dropped in for their photo sessions too. The pages shown were taken from Spick & Span Extra, number 56. I must apologise for the low quality of the images as my scanner is not working and, have simply photographed the pages by hand. Nick Last edited by Knickers1; November 27th, 2010 at 04:34 AM.. Reason: Text |
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Knickers1 For This Useful Post: |
November 27th, 2010, 07:10 AM | #1274 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 6,268
Thanked 60,410 Times in 2,314 Posts
|
We have established that the interior pictures are Nicola's house (see last posting); and I believe the alfresco pictures, here, are her house too. Medium2 confirmed, in an earlier posting, that she had used her own name for her modelling assignments. Just imagine, gentlemen, being a keen collector of Spick and Span, in the days when Nicola was modelling and living around the corner from her and knowing her? What a delicious thought. I wonder if she was plagued with admirers during her modelling days?! Nick
|
November 27th, 2010, 11:31 AM | #1275 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 18
Thanks: 26
Thanked 67 Times in 9 Posts
|
This thread really brings back some memories. I remember reading a lot of SPICK, SPAN and BEAUTIFUL BRITONS. They look so innocent today, but at the time we thought they were cutting edge stuff. I suspect nowadays you could run almost identical pictures as advertisements for underwear!
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to mikehobart For This Useful Post: |
November 27th, 2010, 01:15 PM | #1276 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,038
Thanks: 2,845
Thanked 25,654 Times in 1,013 Posts
|
|
The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to JGW For This Useful Post: |
November 27th, 2010, 01:48 PM | #1277 | |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,038
Thanks: 2,845
Thanked 25,654 Times in 1,013 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to JGW For This Useful Post: |
November 27th, 2010, 05:59 PM | #1278 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 367
Thanks: 1,767
Thanked 3,617 Times in 338 Posts
|
We can't assume that KH is even aware of this site!
Nick; While I certainly take the point about NT being on a toddlers pushy thingy is good evidence that she did have young children, it's wrong to asume that the stuff that was written to accompay the photos is factual. Another photographer who'd had stuff in the mags told me that it often wasn't. I didn't say that 'Nicola Taylor' was her real name, by the way. I said it was what she told me it was! As she was a lot less forthcoming and friendly than LSJ didn't particularly believe her! Last edited by Medium2; April 15th, 2018 at 08:34 PM.. |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Medium2 For This Useful Post: |
November 29th, 2010, 08:49 AM | #1279 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 6,268
Thanked 60,410 Times in 2,314 Posts
|
Sadly, I suspect you are right, Medium2 and, the narrative provided with the photo sets is probably somewhat spurious. One just has to look at how many times the same girl was featured in the magazines over the years with different names. I always hoped however, that things were different with Nicola and friends. Oh what a pity KH is probably unaware of this site as, only he can illuminate us with the true facts......I live in hope. One of my all time fav pics of Nicola and Marie in "Nicola's house". Nick
Last edited by Knickers1; November 29th, 2010 at 09:00 AM.. Reason: Text |
The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to Knickers1 For This Useful Post: |
November 30th, 2010, 06:03 AM | #1280 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 6,268
Thanked 60,410 Times in 2,314 Posts
|
|
The Following 27 Users Say Thank You to Knickers1 For This Useful Post: |
|
|