General Election 8 June

[Brooksie]

I'd always heard that it gave an involuntary hard on. If people can't get erections then viagra would do nothing for them. Surely it must work whether or not you can get a boner? Maybe it just depends on whether there are underlying issues? Maybe some of the pills are a little hit and miss?

[bloke57]

Originally Posted by Brooksie

I'd always heard that it gave an involuntary hard on. If people can't get erections then viagra would do nothing for them. Surely it must work whether or not you can get a boner? Maybe it just depends on whether there are underlying issues? Maybe some of the pills are a little hit and miss?

It doesn't just give you an erection. That would be very damaging to the tissue.

What it does is take away one of the factors that may inhibit an erection - an enzyme that can restrict blood flow and which gets more prevalent with age. But it only works if you allow yourself to be stimulated in the normal way(s). In fact if it does cause a prolonged involuntary stiffy you should go to hospital ASAP.

Cialis does a similar thing but is longer lasting and has fewer side effects.

[Brooksie]

But isn't the viagra joke that it doesn't go down for ages? The few people I know that have taken it said they had a 4 hour boner!

Sounds like Cialis might be better...