|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Softcore Models Discussion For all chat and discussions on Vintage Models |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
June 16th, 2014, 07:50 PM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 127
Thanks: 904
Thanked 1,640 Times in 114 Posts
|
Tiffany Towers's Titanic Titty Transformation
Of the humongous booby fashion of the 90s, I think Tiff might have been my favourite model. But on and off looking at the sets of her I have, it seems to me that she started off natural and busty, which is why her enhanced boobs looked a bit more soft and natural than others' (this being of course relative). Take these two sets-
These look natural to me- http://www.vintage-erotica-forum.com...4&postcount=67 whereas these are the obvious silicone- http://www.vintage-erotica-forum.com...6&postcount=66 Yes? No? Am I right? Does it matter? Probably not. Whatever... at one time in my youf assuming enhancement, I thought it might be two boob jobs, one smaller and one larger, but looking at the pics I think the first set are all natural and a jolly nice pair too, in which case she might have been as well to leave 'em as nature intended maybe. Anyway, what do others think? *edit* Just dawned on me that this ought to be in hardcore models discussion. D'oh! Last edited by spoonman2; June 16th, 2014 at 09:55 PM.. |
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to spoonman2 For This Useful Post: |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|