[solved] Jolanda Amersforth / Jolanda van Amersfoort - Page 2

**Nightjar** · September 27th, 2017, 10:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beutelwolf

The bloke looks familiar, probably a US pornstar.

It's Mike Ranger...

http://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfi...ike-ranger.htm

If you look in JaV's thread you'll see that she did a few shoots with him.

**Pepper II** · September 28th, 2017, 01:37 AM

I'm convinced Dubie is correct. Aside from physical features there is a matching ring in some of the pictures in post #1 in her thread.

**effCup** · September 28th, 2017, 03:37 AM

The ring's a good spot.

Matching hairline for me.

**matt100qaz** · October 22nd, 2017, 03:44 PM

Original request title: Becky on cover of Slick V1#1 from 1980

Who is Becky? Thanks!

**burpman** · October 22nd, 2017, 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by matt100qaz

Who is Becky? Thanks!

Jolanda van Amersfoort and I am pretty sure that is a wig.

http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/showthread.php?t=81603

**Trip** · November 5th, 2017, 06:50 PM

From another forum, this may be your girl in

Club International (UK) Vol. 10 n. 11 (11-1981)

May be stolen from Club scans here at VEF, I don't know.

**effCup** · November 6th, 2017, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trip

From another forum, this may be your girl in

Club International (UK) Vol. 10 n. 11 (11-1981)

May be stolen from Club scans here at VEF, I don't know.

That is Jolanda van Amersfoort: CIUK 10-11, 1981-11 as Lisa - by Rupert Daines. Linked in her thread here.

I would have thought this was an even better comparison with mystery:

Quote:

Originally Posted by beutelwolf

Nose, areolae, eyes... but seems mods had doubts after burpman's suggestion.

**highwayman274** · November 6th, 2017, 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by effCup

... but seems mods had doubts after burpman's suggestion.

Sometimes we just do not have enough time left in our Mod session to complete the adjudication, and we have to come back next day to finish up.

**effCup** · November 7th, 2017, 01:44 AM

My comment was not meant as a criticism--more perhaps opening the conversational "space" for mods. to say where their doubts lay.

I quite understand the pressure of time. It's quite understandable if things need to be deferred for the next day, or the day after that. What's less understandable is what means mods have for so managing their precious time--that is, it's over 2 weeks since burpman's post, so this "next day" methodology is obviously not working. Again, that's not a criticism of mods. per se, not of people, but simply highlighting flaws in whatever systems (organisational) are currently being applied.

**Pepper II** · November 7th, 2017, 03:22 AM

What's important to understand is it is not the function of the Moderators to provide proof for a solve; this is up to the members who wish to participate. If we are not sufficiently convinced at the time the thread will be left open until convincing proof is provided. There are times when one of us may be familiar enough with a particular model to approve a solve even if the evidence is wanting. Or we may have adequate time or interest to investigate further ourselves but this is not our obligation.

It is the function of the Moderators of this section to maintain order, to adjudicate based on provided evidence, and to perform subsequent actions as necessary.

October 22nd, 2017, 03:44 PM	#14
matt100qaz Veteran Member Join Date: Nov 2013 Location: Southeast USA Posts: 5,732 Thanks: 3,892 Thanked 178,664 Times in 5,721 Posts	Jolanda van Amersfoort [TNC] Original request title: Becky on cover of Slick V1#1 from 1980 Who is Becky? Thanks! Last edited by deezer; March 2nd, 2018 at 08:22 PM..

November 5th, 2017, 06:50 PM	#16
Trip Senior Moderator Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: S.D.M.F. Posts: 7,784 Thanks: 31,176 Thanked 137,172 Times in 7,623 Posts	Fritchy From another forum, this may be your girl in Club International (UK) Vol. 10 n. 11 (11-1981) May be stolen from Club scans here at VEF, I don't know.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

September 28th, 2017, 01:37 AM	#12
Pepper II Super Moderator Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Sunny South Florida Posts: 7,852 Thanks: 163,934 Thanked 119,242 Times in 7,641 Posts	I'm convinced Dubie is correct. Aside from physical features there is a matching ring in some of the pictures in post #1 in her thread.

September 28th, 2017, 03:37 AM	#13
effCup *Vintage Idiot* Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: History Posts: 22,133 Thanks: 226,710 Thanked 356,735 Times in 21,628 Posts	The ring's a good spot. Matching hairline for me.

November 7th, 2017, 01:44 AM	#19
effCup *Vintage Idiot* Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: History Posts: 22,133 Thanks: 226,710 Thanked 356,735 Times in 21,628 Posts	My comment was not meant as a criticism--more perhaps opening the conversational "space" for mods. to say where their doubts lay. I quite understand the pressure of time. It's quite understandable if things need to be deferred for the next day, or the day after that. What's less understandable is what means mods have for so managing their precious time--that is, it's over 2 weeks since burpman's post, so this "next day" methodology is obviously not working. Again, that's not a criticism of mods. per se, not of people, but simply highlighting flaws in whatever systems (organisational) are currently being applied.

November 7th, 2017, 03:22 AM	#20
Pepper II Super Moderator Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Sunny South Florida Posts: 7,852 Thanks: 163,934 Thanked 119,242 Times in 7,641 Posts	What's important to understand is it is not the function of the Moderators to provide proof for a solve; this is up to the members who wish to participate. If we are not sufficiently convinced at the time the thread will be left open until convincing proof is provided. There are times when one of us may be familiar enough with a particular model to approve a solve even if the evidence is wanting. Or we may have adequate time or interest to investigate further ourselves but this is not our obligation. It is the function of the Moderators of this section to maintain order, to adjudicate based on provided evidence, and to perform subsequent actions as necessary.