|
![]() |
Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Southeast USA
Posts: 5,732
Thanks: 3,892
Thanked 178,795 Times in 5,721 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Hello All,
I will really appreciate your thoughts. I'm pretty new to actually processing the scans that I make. I use GIMP to Descreen and Despeckle, and then perform an Unsharp Mask. In the end, I'm not sure if the process really provides a better scan to post? Or if I simply need to change my processing settings? I am attaching an example. Which do you prefer? Can you provide me with advice on how to improve the output (without adding much or any time)? Thanks so much! Matt Original scan at 200dpi: ![]() Descreen, Despeckle, Unsharp Mask: ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Sourcer of Smut
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,839
Thanks: 83,659
Thanked 342,107 Times in 8,431 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Hi Matt,
I absolutely prefer the original scan. Her skin looks splotchy on the edited scan. My guess is that it's caused by the descreening filter of the Gimp. What does it look like when you turn it off? If you want to use descreening, I advise you to use the descreening of your scanning software. I would guess it's already turned on, because the original scan shows little moiré and looks very good already.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Feel free to post my scans to the relevant model threads, but do give credit |
![]() |
![]() |
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Jism Jim For This Useful Post: |
![]() |
|
|