What annoys you the most ?

[Dropped52]

Originally Posted by hound dog

Conservative's in the US who can't let go of the many failed attempts to discredit former politicians who are now in the private sector and no longer seeking election to public office.

It's time to get over it and move on. If criminal charges could in anyway be brought against Hillary Clinton or Barak Obama for whatever fake FOX news claims you believe in and are convinved they are guilty of committing, If there was even the slightest whiff of truth to any of them your boys in the Congress would have acted on it by now, if not before they left public office and/or retired. Republican's tried to impeach Bill Clinton for lying about getting a BJ in the oval office after the whitewater investigation went nowhere, for Christ's sake. They'd have acted against Hillary or former president Obama if they had absolutely anything that could hold even a little bit of water by now.

Think they fall in same category as the Russian collusion folks. Get over that crap by now

[hound dog]

Originally Posted by Dropped52

Think they fall in same category as the Russian collusion folks. Get over that crap by now

Once the investigation has run its course, whether Trump, himself, is implicated or not, I'll be very happy to put this treasonous episode behind us and, as a country, hopefully, move on. But since three people have already been criminally indicted this far into the investigation, with one accepting a plea bargain, I'd rather let Mueller complete it and see what else he finds. Trump supporter's just scream and cry it's all fake and for it to be stopped immediately. The only explanation for stopping it that I can see, is you're terrified of who else will be found complicit and how high up the chain it goes.

[Dropped52]

Hound dog I'm appalled at being accused of being a Trump supporter! How dare you I do agree with letting it run its course but at a certain part of me wishes it was less partisan, muller has some Clinton ties and the appointees are some ex Obama folks. I personally don't think he worked with the Russians to get elected but do I think they pulled some strings? Yes, am I rabid about denial, no if it looks like poop and smells like poop it's probably shit! Aside from that tho they need to come to a conclusion and then once one is met then proceed with whatever legal actions can be taken, I don't think impeachment will stick tho because of numbers and a lack of will to convict. I would enjoy a serious break from the bonehead sending late night drunk tweets, sad.

[Wendigo]

Originally Posted by Dropped52

I would enjoy a serious break from the bonehead sending late night drunk tweets, sad.

I fully agree, does that numpty still think he's a spotty sad "the whole world is against me" teenager ??

[Estreeter]

Originally Posted by rosestone

Yeah, it's the big business lobby, as it always is. The consensus is among scientists, and they're sh**-scared. And, as Neil Degrasse-Tyson has pointed out, when scientists say there's going to be an eclipse, nobody doubts them. So why is climate change different?

Don't get me wrong, I ain't totally convinced that climate change is real or not but, there is a difference

1. Money

2. We can't change or alter a total eclipse event in any way but with climate change, figures can be altered, our Government weather bureau was found to be altering and or deleting offical low temps to be higher this year

http://jennifermarohasy.com/2017/07/...y-2-july-2017/

makes one wonder don't it

[rosestone]

Originally Posted by Estreeter

Don't get me wrong, I ain't totally convinced that climate change is real or not but, there is a difference

1. Money

2. We can't change or alter a total eclipse event in any way but with climate change, figures can be altered, our Government weather bureau was found to be altering and or deleting offical low temps to be higher this year

http://jennifermarohasy.com/2017/07/...y-2-july-2017/

makes one wonder don't it

I agree, it's money, and if they're altering empirical data to suit an agenda, then they aren't 'scientists'. Science is the process by which we narrow down to the truth.

I don't know, it just seems strange to me when people dispute with scientists about climate change (and the consensus amongst them is overwhelming) - those same people would never dream of disputing calculus with a mathematician, for example.

[Dropped52]

Originally Posted by Wendigo

I fully agree, does that numpty still think he's a spotty sad "the whole world is against me" teenager ??

The best part tho is I saw Andy serkis do a reading of his tweets as gollom. I died laughing.

[Dropped52]

Originally Posted by rosestone

I agree, it's money, and if they're altering empirical data to suit an agenda, then they aren't 'scientists'. Science is the process by which we narrow down to the truth.

I don't know, it just seems strange to me when people dispute with scientists about climate change (and the consensus amongst them is overwhelming) - those same people would never dream of disputing calculus with a mathematician, for example.

The whole climate change debacle is being pushed by people with the fix of a global carbon tax, last i checked, at least here in America, all extra tax dollars do is allow fat cats to stay in office longer with a bigger salary. Here is a thought if money was the fix all then wouldn't it make sense that dumping piles of money on a fire would stomp it out? Yet it makes it grow...

[rosestone]

Originally Posted by Dropped52

Here is a thought if money was the fix all then wouldn't it make sense that dumping piles of money on a fire would stomp it out? Yet it makes it grow...

"As for throwing money at problems: that's what money is for." Kurt Vonnegut.

[Estreeter]

Originally Posted by rosestone

"As for throwing money at problems: that's what money is for." Kurt Vonnegut.

Can that logic be used for a problem gambler