Will Jennifer Aniston get naked on film? - Page 8

boz2boz4 · June 11th, 2012, 03:55 PM

It's too bad Jen decided to blur her breasts. Otherwise, she might have saved a terrible movie. And she might have saved a career that is doomed by making meaningless movies.

I actually have a movie plot that will resurrect her career, plus satisfy all of us who are her fans.

She plays a 45ish mother/widow whose early 20s daughter is getting married. The movie starts with Jen in her early-40s on the night before her husband's birthday. She decides to give him an early birthday present, by seducing him as he lies in the their bed. She emerges from the bathroom in a sexy, fully length, near-sheer nightgown. After teasing him verbally for a few seconds, she removes the gown, and the camera pans up as she takes it off.

She shows everything, from her shapely legs, to shaved labia, to a puff of hair on her mound to her breasts, shoulders, and face. The camera focuses on her face, then on her husband, and we see he is slowly looking at her up and down. The camera switches to Jen, and we see her as her husband sees her, ogling every bit of her body as she walks toward the bed.

The rest of the scene is beautiful, mature sex, and Jen shows more of her body, including her ass and labia from behind as he plays with her and she is on top. After an appropriate time, she asks him, "Do you wan to cum on my face?" Of course, he says, yes, and and we get to see not the actual act, but the aftermath, with her face striped six times from chin to the top of her hair.

The point of the scene is to show how loving a couple they are and how active and beautiful they are to each other as they make love. The way they make love, the full range of beautiful and giving sex, is necessary to show the maturity of their love and their relationship, as well as the way they make love.

We then cut to the present, as Jen and her daughter plan for the marriage, talking about what will be done and who will do what. They raise the question who will walk the daughter down the aisle. The daughter exclaims that she misses her dad. Jen just looks sad, so sad she can't speak, with tears filling her eyes. It's clear that Jen's husband has died, not too long ago.

We then meet the groom. To everyone but Jen, the groom is handsome and young, just like the daughter. To Jen, however, the groom is the reincarnation of her husband. She knows the fiance is not her husband, but to her he looks exactly like him, although a bit younger. This is one of the themes of the movie: that she is traumatized by losing the love of her life and projects that onto her daughter's fiance.

To carry this off, and to make Jen comfortable with the sex scenes, her real-life boyfriend, Justin Theroux will be play both the daughter's fiance and Jen's husband. As Jen's husband, he'll look 45ish and with the maturity and confidence that comes with accomplishment. As the fiance, he'll look 22, still not fully mature, reserved, a bit innocent.

Cutting to the chase, what happens next? The daughter becomes seriously ill, the wedding goes on anyway, as the fiance is a very loyal guy. Unfortunately, the daughter dies a few months after the wedding.

Now we enter the main part of the movie, the major theme. I think you know what comes next. Jen falls in love with her deceased daughter's widower, although he is only 23 now and she is 46. The rest of the movies explores their compatibility. There will be none of the trite cliches that we see in other movies about May-September romances, no statements about different music tastes, movies seen by Jen when released and by the daughter's husband on Netflix, not knowing who Ronald Reagan is. The movie will focus on their being in different times in their lives, explained by 20 years of Jen's growing up with her deceased husband.

This point will be driven home sexually when Jen seduces him. He's just not as comfortable with the ranges of sexual gifts that she can give him and those that she wants him to give her. She scene will still be gentle and loving without any hint of exasperation by her or embarrassment for him, but it will be clear that while they are compatible and on the same path emotionally, intellectually, and sexually, he is 20 years behind her and will never catch up.

That is major theme that will require great script writing and acting without words, to show that the only thing that separates them is 20 years: had he been 20 years older, they would have been meant for each other.

And, oh, by the way, Jen will show us lots of her body when she and the daughter's husband have sex. He plays with her breasts, she kneels over him and rubs her breasts over his entire body, from is face to his cock. He'll massage her entire body, front and back. The difference will be she knows what to do. He doesn't know nearly as much, and she has to tell him.

There's my ten cents' worth. I hope one of you is a movie producer and can get this done. This idea for this script is my gift to all of you.

boz2boz4 · June 11th, 2012, 05:13 PM

The problem is that actresses like Jennifer Aniston have and make so much money that they have complete independence. Their financial futures aren't tied to the success of the movies, because they receive high guaranteed payments. The producers have no leverage over them. They don't need to work in the future to be secure financially. It's the exact opposite of the old studio days. Can you imagine how much nudity we would have had then from major stars? It would have been awesome.

Is there any hope that the version of Wanderlust screened overseas several months ago will surface, or that someone will leak the original, unblurred scenes?

Quote:

Originally Posted by mlc297207

I agree with everyone, however the major problem is the producers and director casting her and women like her in movies that require nudity, either they hold her to the contract or this will continue and so far she's 2 for 2 {Wanderlust and The Break up} but I agree this latest box office bomb could'nt have help.

**Sirch** · June 27th, 2012, 11:32 PM

She was adorable back in the days of friends and the best actor in the series. Her dropping her towel scene while prancing around the apartment was an eye opener for the imagination. Even if we only saw her back and sort of side of one breast.

Regarding today. Really can't say I care to see any women bare all after their 30's. If you waited this long, the fantasy kinda dies. I wanted to see you in your prime. There's something slutty about doing so later in age. Perhaps to rejuvenate a career or sell more BO tickets than you normally do.

But I don't have a problem if she doesn't want to show it all. That's her choice and she has the money to stand her grounds. So good for her.

What amazes me is how this women can work consistently in film for over 20 years and really not have a successful run at it. She defies the old saying "your only as good as your last film".

**pharoahegypt** · June 27th, 2012, 11:40 PM

no one here is moaning about her deciding not to show her body;;; or they wouldn't be if she didn't keep promising to do so just to put bums on seats in the first place.....!!!!

yes; if she doesn't want to show her naked body; fine.. no problem....!!!

but don't keep telling us you're going to; sell extra tickets; then say "sorry, changed my mind"........ that's just not cricket...!!!

**Sirch** · June 27th, 2012, 11:42 PM

Can't say Ive really followed her career after friends. So she's been teasing/promising for real, then not living up to the hype?

Quote:

Originally Posted by pharoahegypt

no one here is moaning about her deciding not to show her body;;; or they wouldn't be if she didn't keep promising to do so just to put bums on seats in the first place.....!!!!

yes; if she doesn't want to show her naked body; fine.. no problem....!!!

but don't keep telling us you're going to; sell extra tickets; then say "sorry, changed my mind"........ that's just not cricket...!!!

MrBombastic · June 29th, 2012, 05:47 AM

Regarding Jen's career, I believe that the "powers that be" have made sure Jennifer never gets close to the realm of a serious actress. She has the potential to play a serious part but never does. Her only big hits are in comedies, which are no threat to any serious actress. Her breakup with Brad Pitt sealed her fate as an actress. As long as Jolie is in the picture and Jennifer is still a young, beautiful actress, she will be blacklisted to comedy hits. It's a power struggle that Jolie & Pitt are winning as the biggest stars in Hollywood, with a grudge against Jennifer.

boz2boz4 · June 29th, 2012, 03:14 PM

That "slutty" comment got me thinking. Jen clearly has taken all her clothes off and shown all her charms to the crew on several movie sets, including The Break Up and Marley and Me, and shown her breasts to a large number of the crew in Wunderlust. But she doesn't want the world to see her nude, out of respect to her boyfriend. Does that not sound like a prostitute who keeps her job secret and exposes herself only to a few, instead of a men's club dancer or an actress like Michelle Williams? There's something neurotic about the distinction she's drawing in finding it OK to expose herself to a few men but not to all.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirch

She was adorable back in the days of friends and the best actor in the series. Her dropping her towel scene while prancing around the apartment was an eye opener for the imagination. Even if we only saw her back and sort of side of one breast.

Regarding today. Really can't say I care to see any women bare all after their 30's. If you waited this long, the fantasy kinda dies. I wanted to see you in your prime. There's something slutty about doing so later in age. Perhaps to rejuvenate a career or sell more BO tickets than you normally do.

But I don't have a problem if she doesn't want to show it all. That's her choice and she has the money to stand her grounds. So good for her.

What amazes me is how this women can work consistently in film for over 20 years and really not have a successful run at it. She defies the old saying "your only as good as your last film".

**Sirch** · June 29th, 2012, 03:30 PM

Quote:

That "slutty" comment got me thinking. Jen clearly has taken all her clothes off and shown all her charms to the crew on several movie sets

Actors can ask for a skeleton crew on set when doing nudity.

While that one topless shot did leak out, I wonder if she had pasties covering the goods in Wanderlust? Considering how many people were within her proximity. With the digital blocking how would we ever know?

On the other hand it could be like you said. She got her kicks doing a little bit of voyeurism in a controlled environment with the confidence it wouldn't ever go "public".

**pharoahegypt** · June 29th, 2012, 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirch

Actors can ask for a skeleton crew on set when doing nudity.

I'm aware that these 'skeleton' crews only mean that there are around forty dribbling crew hanging around, rather than the usual sixty..!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sirch

While that one topless shot did leak out, I wonder if she had pasties covering the goods in Wanderlust? Considering how many people were within her proximity. With the digital blocking how would we ever know?

It was supposedly filmed with Jen completely topless; and allegedly with the intention of showing her breasts; it was only later that they used cgi to block out her breasts.

Have to agree though; there are now most probably plenty of studio hands and crew out there who have seen her topless, and don't even care that they have; whereas as for all her faults... we bloody well do want to..!!!

boz2boz4 · July 6th, 2012, 03:58 PM

Now that is well said. Jen being nude does matter to us!

Quote:

Originally Posted by pharoahegypt

Have to agree though; there are now most probably plenty of studio hands and crew out there who have seen her topless, and don't even care that they have; whereas as for all her faults... we bloody well do want to..!!!

June 11th, 2012, 03:55 PM	#71
boz2boz4 Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 16 Thanks: 4,692 Thanked 128 Times in 15 Posts	Saving Jen's Career It's too bad Jen decided to blur her breasts. Otherwise, she might have saved a terrible movie. And she might have saved a career that is doomed by making meaningless movies. I actually have a movie plot that will resurrect her career, plus satisfy all of us who are her fans. She plays a 45ish mother/widow whose early 20s daughter is getting married. The movie starts with Jen in her early-40s on the night before her husband's birthday. She decides to give him an early birthday present, by seducing him as he lies in the their bed. She emerges from the bathroom in a sexy, fully length, near-sheer nightgown. After teasing him verbally for a few seconds, she removes the gown, and the camera pans up as she takes it off. She shows everything, from her shapely legs, to shaved labia, to a puff of hair on her mound to her breasts, shoulders, and face. The camera focuses on her face, then on her husband, and we see he is slowly looking at her up and down. The camera switches to Jen, and we see her as her husband sees her, ogling every bit of her body as she walks toward the bed. The rest of the scene is beautiful, mature sex, and Jen shows more of her body, including her ass and labia from behind as he plays with her and she is on top. After an appropriate time, she asks him, "Do you wan to cum on my face?" Of course, he says, yes, and and we get to see not the actual act, but the aftermath, with her face striped six times from chin to the top of her hair. The point of the scene is to show how loving a couple they are and how active and beautiful they are to each other as they make love. The way they make love, the full range of beautiful and giving sex, is necessary to show the maturity of their love and their relationship, as well as the way they make love. We then cut to the present, as Jen and her daughter plan for the marriage, talking about what will be done and who will do what. They raise the question who will walk the daughter down the aisle. The daughter exclaims that she misses her dad. Jen just looks sad, so sad she can't speak, with tears filling her eyes. It's clear that Jen's husband has died, not too long ago. We then meet the groom. To everyone but Jen, the groom is handsome and young, just like the daughter. To Jen, however, the groom is the reincarnation of her husband. She knows the fiance is not her husband, but to her he looks exactly like him, although a bit younger. This is one of the themes of the movie: that she is traumatized by losing the love of her life and projects that onto her daughter's fiance. To carry this off, and to make Jen comfortable with the sex scenes, her real-life boyfriend, Justin Theroux will be play both the daughter's fiance and Jen's husband. As Jen's husband, he'll look 45ish and with the maturity and confidence that comes with accomplishment. As the fiance, he'll look 22, still not fully mature, reserved, a bit innocent. Cutting to the chase, what happens next? The daughter becomes seriously ill, the wedding goes on anyway, as the fiance is a very loyal guy. Unfortunately, the daughter dies a few months after the wedding. Now we enter the main part of the movie, the major theme. I think you know what comes next. Jen falls in love with her deceased daughter's widower, although he is only 23 now and she is 46. The rest of the movies explores their compatibility. There will be none of the trite cliches that we see in other movies about May-September romances, no statements about different music tastes, movies seen by Jen when released and by the daughter's husband on Netflix, not knowing who Ronald Reagan is. The movie will focus on their being in different times in their lives, explained by 20 years of Jen's growing up with her deceased husband. This point will be driven home sexually when Jen seduces him. He's just not as comfortable with the ranges of sexual gifts that she can give him and those that she wants him to give her. She scene will still be gentle and loving without any hint of exasperation by her or embarrassment for him, but it will be clear that while they are compatible and on the same path emotionally, intellectually, and sexually, he is 20 years behind her and will never catch up. That is major theme that will require great script writing and acting without words, to show that the only thing that separates them is 20 years: had he been 20 years older, they would have been meant for each other. And, oh, by the way, Jen will show us lots of her body when she and the daughter's husband have sex. He plays with her breasts, she kneels over him and rubs her breasts over his entire body, from is face to his cock. He'll massage her entire body, front and back. The difference will be she knows what to do. He doesn't know nearly as much, and she has to tell him. There's my ten cents' worth. I hope one of you is a movie producer and can get this done. This idea for this script is my gift to all of you. Last edited by boz2boz4; June 11th, 2012 at 05:07 PM.. Reason: unnecessary over-quote

June 27th, 2012, 11:40 PM	#74
pharoahegypt Vintage Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Middle England Posts: 4,491 Thanks: 10,176 Thanked 43,618 Times in 4,154 Posts	no one here is moaning about her deciding not to show her body;;; or they wouldn't be if she didn't keep promising to do so just to put bums on seats in the first place.....!!!! yes; if she doesn't want to show her naked body; fine.. no problem....!!! but don't keep telling us you're going to; sell extra tickets; then say "sorry, changed my mind"........ that's just not cricket...!!! __________________ Arguing with a intelligent person is hard; but arguing with a stupid person is impossible!

June 27th, 2012, 11:32 PM	#73
Sirch Vintage Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Posts: 1,216 Thanks: 18,391 Thanked 12,680 Times in 1,147 Posts	She was adorable back in the days of friends and the best actor in the series. Her dropping her towel scene while prancing around the apartment was an eye opener for the imagination. Even if we only saw her back and sort of side of one breast. Regarding today. Really can't say I care to see any women bare all after their 30's. If you waited this long, the fantasy kinda dies. I wanted to see you in your prime. There's something slutty about doing so later in age. Perhaps to rejuvenate a career or sell more BO tickets than you normally do. But I don't have a problem if she doesn't want to show it all. That's her choice and she has the money to stand her grounds. So good for her. What amazes me is how this women can work consistently in film for over 20 years and really not have a successful run at it. She defies the old saying "your only as good as your last film".

June 29th, 2012, 05:47 AM	#76
MrBombastic Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 123 Thanks: 7,276 Thanked 2,021 Times in 124 Posts	Regarding Jen's career, I believe that the "powers that be" have made sure Jennifer never gets close to the realm of a serious actress. She has the potential to play a serious part but never does. Her only big hits are in comedies, which are no threat to any serious actress. Her breakup with Brad Pitt sealed her fate as an actress. As long as Jolie is in the picture and Jennifer is still a young, beautiful actress, she will be blacklisted to comedy hits. It's a power struggle that Jolie & Pitt are winning as the biggest stars in Hollywood, with a grudge against Jennifer.