Problem Reports, Questions & General Announcements

[effCup]

2 dead images from modern softcore women:
MO-SC-2W [2011-IV] - page_03
MO-SC-2W [2011-IV] - page_05

[Pepper II]

Originally Posted by effCup

2 dead images from modern softcore women:
MO-SC-2W [2011-IV] - page_03
MO-SC-2W [2011-IV] - page_05

Repaired; thanks.

[ConstantOgler]

Observations re the Softcore Solved Directory. Imo:
"Matures":
'Avida @ Newlook' is Pam Zinszer.
'Hazel Russell' is Angie Lynn (Myfr)
'Jill Russo' is TLI Lila Tennyson, fwiw

in "Women", a 'Tracy West' who is someone else.

[effCup]

Originally Posted by ConstantOgler

'Jill Russo' is TLI Lila Tennyson, fwiw

in "Women", a 'Tracy West' who is someone else.

Jill Russo | Lila Tennyson = Penelope Parker (Mayfair name used on vef).
You may be confusing the UK softcore Tracey West & the US pornstar Tracy West? Though presumably the latter's pic. should be in the hc section not softcore? It's complicated by the fact that UK Tracey sometimes had her name spelt Tracy.

[effCup]

Something for MIR mods. to consider: I've often thought how valuable it is when folks here find a box post link for an existing query, including sometimes a query that's already got its own box post. These are not "solves" but can still be very valuable steps towards such.

I may be mis-remembering but I think exfarmer once mentioned how he would try to include some minor rewards/tweaks in favour of such folks when he was doing his fortnightly or monthly HoF summaries/round-ups. Well, that's long gone, and mystery box solves are also (rightly) more generously rewarded these days. That got me thinking: is there scope in the current system for rewarding "box finders", or not/would that be too complicated?

I also thought the weekly/fortnightly mystery box "feature" was an excellent/fun idea, i.e. trying to keep people interested in solving old puzzles. Is there scope for restoring such now or not?

No, I don't have anything specific in mind for any of the above, & nothing retrospective, just asking/kite-flying. /shrug/

[highwayman274]

Originally Posted by effCup

Something for MIR mods. to consider: I've often thought how valuable it is when folks here find a box post link for an existing query, including sometimes a query that's already got its own box post. These are not "solves" but can still be very valuable steps towards such.

Please stand by . . . . . discussion taking place among Mods in the background.

[Pepper II]

Hi, guys.

It's 10:35 pm here and I just got home. It's been a very loooong day so don't expect much from me this evening. We'll return to our regularly scheduled programming tomorrow evening.

Thanks and regards.

[beutelwolf]

box 2014: 220
At the end of the post it claims that the poster found out, i.e. he put that in in a later edit. So why is this in the box - do the mods disagree with that?

[Rubinski]

Originally Posted by beutelwolf

box 2014: 220
At the end of the post it claims that the poster found out, i.e. he put that in in a later edit. So why is this in the box - do the mods disagree with that?

Thanks for looking at this, and pointing it out.

I may have moved it to the MB, but I don't remember this one.
It was probably many months ago.
If I did move it there, maybe I made a mistake.

I'm not sure what should be done on this one.
Looks like it may be solved, but solves are above my pay grade.

[Pepper II]

Originally Posted by beutelwolf

box 2014: 220
At the end of the post it claims that the poster found out, i.e. he put that in in a later edit. So why is this in the box - do the mods disagree with that?

It all seems about as clear as mud. If anyone has any insight on this please post it in the discussion thread linked in the MB post. Thanks.