|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar |
Vintage Erotica Talk Talk about vintage erotica right here! |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
June 30th, 2016, 03:32 AM | #11 |
Former Staff
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: deep swamp
Posts: 1,330
Thanks: 36,798
Thanked 10,013 Times in 1,252 Posts
|
car make
very much that of a Desoto. saw a lot of them as a kid.
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to flake56 For This Useful Post: |
July 1st, 2016, 01:56 AM | #12 |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,571
Thanks: 11,941
Thanked 156,302 Times in 3,527 Posts
|
I don't think it's a DeSoto. Here are pics of a 1951 and a 1953 DeSoto. The trunk emblem is distinctive and does not match
But, with some help from the guys at the American Antique Car Association Forum, I think we have a match in the 1953 Mercury, shown below. The trunk emblem and bumper is the clincher for me: So I'm 95% convinced that the movie was made in '53 or later. When recalling details in that interview nearly 50 years after the fact, it's understandable that Candy could have been off on the exact year. I don't doubt she was forced into sex at age 15 or 16, but this movie couldn't have been made when she was that young, unless that car traveled back in time. |
The Following 22 Users Say Thank You to bozoclown For This Useful Post: |
July 1st, 2016, 03:49 PM | #13 | |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,121
Thanks: 12,865
Thanked 19,524 Times in 1,039 Posts
|
Quote:
Candy was married at 14; in the early half of the 20th century it was entirely normal for women to marry at 16; the "average" age an American girls loses her virginity in the US is currently 17, which means (since many remain virgins into their 20s) that quite a few have to be losing it at 15, to create the average. All this to say that the fixation with "18" has to do with current (rather recent) laws governing films, and shouldn't affect how we judge what people did back in the 50s. Last edited by qwerty17; July 1st, 2016 at 04:16 PM.. |
|
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to qwerty17 For This Useful Post: |
July 1st, 2016, 09:16 PM | #14 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,571
Thanks: 11,941
Thanked 156,302 Times in 3,527 Posts
|
Quote:
The fixation with 18 has more to do with what this forum will allow to be posted here. I say this evidence makes the clip allowable at VEF. |
|
The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to bozoclown For This Useful Post: |
July 16th, 2016, 03:45 PM | #15 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,121
Thanks: 12,865
Thanked 19,524 Times in 1,039 Posts
|
|
July 21st, 2016, 11:58 PM | #16 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 2 Posts
|
I'm pretty sure that is a 1959 DeSoto, possibly the Firedome Sportsman. The taillights for the '57 and '58 models were similar, but the license plate holder was in the middle in between the fins. Earlier models did not have such pronounced fins. There is no way that car was built even close to 1951. I realize I am also saying the movie was probably not made in 1955, either, but I could not find a 1955 tail fin with that distinctive six lamp arrangement.
|
July 22nd, 2016, 12:05 AM | #17 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 2 Posts
|
Just to correct myself, the image is blurry, but if that is a four lamp tail light, it could be a 1955 Dodge. That is the earliest I could find that style of tail fins.
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Harry1953 For This Useful Post: |
August 24th, 2021, 04:20 AM | #18 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 10
Thanks: 127
Thanked 176 Times in 9 Posts
|
Quote:
The pipe railing in the background makes it look like the left fin of the black car is a '57 Chevy fin, but it looks to me that it is just the pipe railing for traffic or to keep people from falling over. The right rear fin of the black car is curved/ streamlined like the '53-'54 models shown above. The center chrome trunk emblem is similar to what the Buicks and Chevys had in the mid 50's. You can see the pipe railing continue in other frames of the film: To me, if the earliest the car would have been produced was 1953 or 1954, and she was born in 1935, she would have been 18 or 19 when those cars were made. There's a big chance that these low-budget films would have been made by guys who didn't have the money for new cars, and instead opted for cars a few years old. She also doesn't look like she could have been that young from the screenshots posted, it is possible that she may have just been trying to eliminate that part of her life that she might have been embarrassed about when she got older. |
August 24th, 2021, 05:58 AM | #19 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Land of the free within reasonable limitations
Posts: 10,935
Thanks: 50,612
Thanked 91,390 Times in 10,784 Posts
|
The closest I have come is a 1955 Mercury Montclair.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/182945959905 I have requested help on a non-car forum but maybe you should check on car forums? Maybe a 1954 Mercury Sun Valley? https://www.mecum.com/lots/SC0512-12...ry-sun-valley/ Some on the other forum are saying 55 DeSoto or 55 Chevy Bel Air That 1951 date for "Smart Alec" appears to be a completely different film from 1951. *crap, so sleepy - I didn't even notice all the other posts. Last edited by Rogerbh; August 24th, 2021 at 07:17 AM.. |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Rogerbh For This Useful Post: |
November 5th, 2022, 01:53 PM | #20 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 18
Thanks: 4
Thanked 58 Times in 11 Posts
|
It's blurry, but it appears to be either a 50 or 51 Oldsmobile. All sources confirm the movie was made in 1951, including Candy herself. Look again at the driver's side rear of the car; that is NOT a tailfin. It is part of the building or a fence rail in the background. The angle of the camera shot makes it look like the car has fins, but it does not. There is no fin on the passenger side. The bumperettes, taillights, and trunk emblem match the Oldsmobile design.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to chfisher2004 For This Useful Post: |
|
|