Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum
Home
Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Discussion & Talk Forum > Vintage Erotica > Vintage Erotica Talk
Best Porn Sites Live Sex Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices
Vintage Erotica Talk Talk about vintage erotica right here!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old June 30th, 2016, 03:32 AM   #11
flake56
Former Staff
 
flake56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: deep swamp
Posts: 1,330
Thanks: 36,798
Thanked 10,013 Times in 1,252 Posts
flake56 50000+flake56 50000+flake56 50000+flake56 50000+flake56 50000+flake56 50000+flake56 50000+flake56 50000+flake56 50000+flake56 50000+flake56 50000+
Default car make

very much that of a Desoto. saw a lot of them as a kid.
flake56 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to flake56 For This Useful Post:
Old July 1st, 2016, 01:56 AM   #12
bozoclown
Moderator
 
bozoclown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,571
Thanks: 11,941
Thanked 156,302 Times in 3,527 Posts
bozoclown 750000+bozoclown 750000+bozoclown 750000+bozoclown 750000+bozoclown 750000+bozoclown 750000+bozoclown 750000+bozoclown 750000+bozoclown 750000+bozoclown 750000+bozoclown 750000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flake56 View Post
very much that of a Desoto. saw a lot of them as a kid.
I don't think it's a DeSoto. Here are pics of a 1951 and a 1953 DeSoto. The trunk emblem is distinctive and does not match



But, with some help from the guys at the American Antique Car Association Forum, I think we have a match in the 1953 Mercury, shown below. The trunk emblem and bumper is the clincher for me:


So I'm 95% convinced that the movie was made in '53 or later.

When recalling details in that interview nearly 50 years after the fact, it's understandable that Candy could have been off on the exact year. I don't doubt she was forced into sex at age 15 or 16, but this movie couldn't have been made when she was that young, unless that car traveled back in time.
bozoclown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 1st, 2016, 03:49 PM   #13
qwerty17
Vintage Member
 
qwerty17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,121
Thanks: 12,865
Thanked 19,524 Times in 1,039 Posts
qwerty17 100000+qwerty17 100000+qwerty17 100000+qwerty17 100000+qwerty17 100000+qwerty17 100000+qwerty17 100000+qwerty17 100000+qwerty17 100000+qwerty17 100000+qwerty17 100000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bozoclown View Post
But, with some help from the guys at the American Antique Car Association Forum, I think we have a match in the 1953 Mercury, shown below. The trunk emblem and bumper is the clincher for me:

Those clearly aren't the same car: in the B&W image the fins top angle is nearly 90° - more like 70° in the color image. Different bumper, different tail lights.

Candy was married at 14; in the early half of the 20th century it was entirely normal for women to marry at 16; the "average" age an American girls loses her virginity in the US is currently 17, which means (since many remain virgins into their 20s) that quite a few have to be losing it at 15, to create the average.

All this to say that the fixation with "18" has to do with current (rather recent) laws governing films, and shouldn't affect how we judge what people did back in the 50s.

Last edited by qwerty17; July 1st, 2016 at 04:16 PM..
qwerty17 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to qwerty17 For This Useful Post:
Old July 1st, 2016, 09:16 PM   #14
bozoclown
Moderator
 
bozoclown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,571
Thanks: 11,941
Thanked 156,302 Times in 3,527 Posts
bozoclown 750000+bozoclown 750000+bozoclown 750000+bozoclown 750000+bozoclown 750000+bozoclown 750000+bozoclown 750000+bozoclown 750000+bozoclown 750000+bozoclown 750000+bozoclown 750000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by qwerty17 View Post
Those clearly aren't the same car: in the B&W image the fins top angle is nearly 90° - more like 70° in the color image. Different bumper, different tail lights.
That threw me too, but if you look at the zoomed out picture, you can see there is a fence in the foreground, with a gate that has some kind of plate on each side. The plate obscures the left taillight and the gate post makes it appear that the tailfin is at the wrong angle:



The fixation with 18 has more to do with what this forum will allow to be posted here. I say this evidence makes the clip allowable at VEF.
bozoclown is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to bozoclown For This Useful Post:
Old July 16th, 2016, 03:45 PM   #15
qwerty17
Vintage Member
 
qwerty17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,121
Thanks: 12,865
Thanked 19,524 Times in 1,039 Posts
qwerty17 100000+qwerty17 100000+qwerty17 100000+qwerty17 100000+qwerty17 100000+qwerty17 100000+qwerty17 100000+qwerty17 100000+qwerty17 100000+qwerty17 100000+qwerty17 100000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bozoclown View Post
The fixation with 18 has more to do with what this forum will allow to be posted here. I say this evidence makes the clip allowable at VEF.
qwerty17 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to qwerty17 For This Useful Post:
Old July 21st, 2016, 11:58 PM   #16
Harry1953
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 2 Posts
Harry1953 0
Default

I'm pretty sure that is a 1959 DeSoto, possibly the Firedome Sportsman. The taillights for the '57 and '58 models were similar, but the license plate holder was in the middle in between the fins. Earlier models did not have such pronounced fins. There is no way that car was built even close to 1951. I realize I am also saying the movie was probably not made in 1955, either, but I could not find a 1955 tail fin with that distinctive six lamp arrangement.
Harry1953 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Harry1953 For This Useful Post:
Old July 22nd, 2016, 12:05 AM   #17
Harry1953
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 2 Posts
Harry1953 0
Default

Just to correct myself, the image is blurry, but if that is a four lamp tail light, it could be a 1955 Dodge. That is the earliest I could find that style of tail fins.
Harry1953 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Harry1953 For This Useful Post:
Old August 24th, 2021, 04:20 AM   #18
big-back-then
Member
 
big-back-then's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 10
Thanks: 127
Thanked 176 Times in 9 Posts
big-back-then 500+big-back-then 500+big-back-then 500+big-back-then 500+big-back-then 500+big-back-then 500+big-back-then 500+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bozoclown View Post
There is quite a bit of discussion on page 2 of this thread (6 years ago) regarding the stag film Candy Barr made early in her career, "Smart Alec", including a rumor that she was only 16 at the time, which would put the year at 1951. (Candy was born in July of 1935)

I submit for your approval, a frame from 26 seconds into this film, showing a car which I cannot identify, but which seems to have tail fins of a size which did not appear on cars until the mid-fifties. Are there any classic American car experts at VEF who can correctly date the car shown here?


I say this proves she was of legal age, so I am posting said movie (for scholarly purposes only)

avi; 43.37; 640x480; 00:05:00
When looking at the passenger side of the car, at the rear right side trim, it looks like a '53 or '54 Chevrolet. The bubble-type top also is similar to the '54 Chevy.





The pipe railing in the background makes it look like the left fin of the black car is a '57 Chevy fin, but it looks to me that it is just the pipe railing for traffic or to keep people from falling over. The right rear fin of the black car is curved/ streamlined like the '53-'54 models shown above. The center chrome trunk emblem is similar to what the Buicks and Chevys had in the mid 50's.



You can see the pipe railing continue in other frames of the film:





To me, if the earliest the car would have been produced was 1953 or 1954, and she was born in 1935, she would have been 18 or 19 when those cars were made. There's a big chance that these low-budget films would have been made by guys who didn't have the money for new cars, and instead opted for cars a few years old.

She also doesn't look like she could have been that young from the screenshots posted, it is possible that she may have just been trying to eliminate that part of her life that she might have been embarrassed about when she got older.
big-back-then is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to big-back-then For This Useful Post:
Old August 24th, 2021, 05:58 AM   #19
Rogerbh
Veteran Member
 
Rogerbh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Land of the free within reasonable limitations
Posts: 10,935
Thanks: 50,612
Thanked 91,390 Times in 10,784 Posts
Rogerbh 350000+Rogerbh 350000+Rogerbh 350000+Rogerbh 350000+Rogerbh 350000+Rogerbh 350000+Rogerbh 350000+Rogerbh 350000+Rogerbh 350000+Rogerbh 350000+Rogerbh 350000+
Default

The closest I have come is a 1955 Mercury Montclair.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/182945959905

I have requested help on a non-car forum but maybe you should check on car forums?

Maybe a 1954 Mercury Sun Valley?

https://www.mecum.com/lots/SC0512-12...ry-sun-valley/

Some on the other forum are saying 55 DeSoto or 55 Chevy Bel Air

That 1951 date for "Smart Alec" appears to be a completely different film from 1951.

*crap, so sleepy - I didn't even notice all the other posts.

Last edited by Rogerbh; August 24th, 2021 at 07:17 AM..
Rogerbh is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Rogerbh For This Useful Post:
Old November 5th, 2022, 01:53 PM   #20
chfisher2004
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Posts: 18
Thanks: 4
Thanked 58 Times in 11 Posts
chfisher2004 100+chfisher2004 100+chfisher2004 100+chfisher2004 100+
Default

It's blurry, but it appears to be either a 50 or 51 Oldsmobile. All sources confirm the movie was made in 1951, including Candy herself. Look again at the driver's side rear of the car; that is NOT a tailfin. It is part of the building or a fence rail in the background. The angle of the camera shot makes it look like the car has fins, but it does not. There is no fin on the passenger side. The bumperettes, taillights, and trunk emblem match the Oldsmobile design.
chfisher2004 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to chfisher2004 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 01:53 PM.






vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.1 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.