|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar |
Help Section If you have technical problems or questions then post or look for answers here. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
August 28th, 2013, 01:58 AM | #11 | |
Beloved Sister
Mistress of Mayhem Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: The Great Gig In the Sky
Posts: 6,668
Thanks: 64,911
Thanked 127,574 Times in 6,475 Posts
|
Quote:
.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
August 28th, 2013, 06:13 AM | #12 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 665
Thanks: 5,298
Thanked 16,105 Times in 644 Posts
|
I've transferred a couple of tapes today using the XviD and think that's probably what I'll stick with.
Thanks for tip on the H264 that sounds worth a try too. Thanks to everyone for the help, especially Tester for suggesting this excellent program. Way better than Super IMO. |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Retro_XXX_Buff For This Useful Post: |
August 29th, 2013, 06:19 AM | #13 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 665
Thanks: 5,298
Thanked 16,105 Times in 644 Posts
|
Blurred or jagged edges, similar to LQ WMV file.
These were two different movies I converted with the XMedia Recode.
The first, Kinky Vision, was done in the XviD codec and file ended up being about 2 GB (the size I like). The second, Search For Canadian Beaver, was done with the H.264 codec and ended up being about 1 GB. I've highlighted some of my concerns in the following screenshots from these titles after the conversion. The tapes played in my VHS player a lot better looking than the jagged or blurred edges of objects I have circled. I started out using AVS 4 U software before the Super (C) and this is how the transfers looked using AVS 4 U. In my opinion, this makes it look like a mediocre transfer similar to when I started this whole VHS transfer thing using the WMV format. What are these jagged, blurred, or horizontal / diagonal lines referred to as or better yet is there a filter within the program I can check to get rid of this ? I didn't get these jagged edges with Super (C), but I think Super (C) had a few more boxes you could check before starting a conversion such as "high quality", "48K", "best quality", etc. Is this something to do with deinterlace, denoise, image stabilizer or the scaling mode ( bilinear, fast bilinear, cubic, etc. ) ? The videos show these issues more obvious as they occur, although these screenshots give a smaller reference of what's happening - even though they may not look too bad. Last edited by Retro_XXX_Buff; August 29th, 2013 at 06:26 AM.. |
August 31st, 2013, 10:28 AM | #14 |
Sourcer of Smut
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,832
Thanks: 83,610
Thanked 341,739 Times in 8,425 Posts
|
Yes, they look like interlace jags. Interlacing looks good on traditional crt screens, but bad on TFT and plasma.
Another thing you may look at is fixed or variable bitrate. in material with a lot of motion, like porn, a variable bitrate may give a better result. I think that was the 'high quality' setting in Super.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Feel free to post my scans to the relevant model threads, but do give credit |
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Jism Jim For This Useful Post: |
August 31st, 2013, 07:56 PM | #15 | |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 665
Thanks: 5,298
Thanked 16,105 Times in 644 Posts
|
Quote:
Thanks, this gives me some clues where to start looking. I've come to a halt on transfers again until I get this pesky situation worked out. |
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Retro_XXX_Buff For This Useful Post: |
|
|