|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar |
Vintage Erotica Maximum date of the content allowed to be posted here is 1995. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
September 17th, 2010, 07:38 AM | #921 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Scots Wha Hae.....
Posts: 488
Thanks: 4,566
Thanked 12,195 Times in 471 Posts
|
I reckon it's "Wow! This tree bark is killing me!"
__________________
Like sand through your fingers, time slips away..... |
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to donside For This Useful Post: |
September 17th, 2010, 07:49 AM | #922 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Scots Wha Hae.....
Posts: 488
Thanks: 4,566
Thanked 12,195 Times in 471 Posts
|
Nicola Taylor
Nicola didn't do it for me as much as some of you lads, but each to his own. I don't think these have been posted. Sorry they're not very big.
__________________
Like sand through your fingers, time slips away..... |
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to donside For This Useful Post: |
September 17th, 2010, 07:54 AM | #923 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 6,268
Thanked 60,410 Times in 2,314 Posts
|
Another gem from the pre mini skirt era was the lovely, Gail Johnson aka Estelle MacDonald. What form ! Very statuesque with amazing hips and, in the best bra/pants combo I've ever seen. The whole of her set is very nice as she strips of the layers, alfresco. Nick
Last edited by Knickers1; September 17th, 2010 at 07:55 AM.. Reason: text changed |
The Following 20 Users Say Thank You to Knickers1 For This Useful Post: |
September 17th, 2010, 10:13 AM | #924 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 36
Thanks: 536
Thanked 687 Times in 35 Posts
|
Hands 2
Just to go back to the hands for a moment. I'm amazed that some people can’t see it. It's so obvious when you look at those pics I posted. It's only in the eye of the beholder because it was in the eye of the photographers who took the pictures. Perhaps it was a private joke among the photographers which escaped the notice of most viewers.
The doubters would have us believe that in the one of Susan Douglas, where she is holding a stick sticking up between two balls, the position of the two balls and the cue and her hand was just the result of chance! That's impossible. It's obvious that the photographer has set it up for anyone observant enough to notice it to enjoy. The same goes for all the other photos I posted. The only doubt is whether the girls realised what the photographer was up to. It looks to me as if some of them did, and found it amusing. I was also looking at these pictures for years before I spotted this, but once I twigged it I realised that the photographers sometimes arranged things so that the girls' use of props was in keeping with the purpose of the photos. Here are some more which show this phenomenon, and I am reposting the Susan Douglas one because no one could possibly fail to see what the photographer was up to in that one. I was hoping others would enjoy this and post their own, but if no one else can even see it . . . never mind. I’ll shut up about it and continue to enjoy all the great pics posted here. |
The Following 28 Users Say Thank You to Trouser For This Useful Post: |
September 17th, 2010, 10:45 AM | #925 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 6,268
Thanked 60,410 Times in 2,314 Posts
|
|
The Following 25 Users Say Thank You to Knickers1 For This Useful Post: |
September 17th, 2010, 01:21 PM | #926 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 367
Thanks: 1,767
Thanked 3,617 Times in 338 Posts
|
Got to say, Trouser, the SD pic with the snooker cue and two balls is pretty persuasive! I think that for this, the photographer was having a bit of private fun. Ms D (and the editor!) almost certainly had no idea what he was up to!
|
September 17th, 2010, 04:01 PM | #927 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,038
Thanks: 2,845
Thanked 25,654 Times in 1,013 Posts
|
Nice clothes to soak. Prefer faces to smile at the camera but the lady is busy taking off her wet shoes. Her wet stockings gleam. She wears her gloves in the shower - as you do !
Last edited by JGW; September 18th, 2010 at 07:53 AM.. |
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to JGW For This Useful Post: |
September 18th, 2010, 08:25 AM | #928 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 6,268
Thanked 60,410 Times in 2,314 Posts
|
The pics in this selection cover a few topics that have been raised and discussed in previous postings. The pic of Nicola and Marie has never been posted here and, I think it represents Ken Howard's more suggestive approach that he used occasionally. Toni Townsend is in tights, (I think it might have been a little chilly when Toni's pic was taken!). Lois Seeds is displaying the most amazing pubic shadow I have ever seen in S&S. Liz McEwen looks lovely in a white bra and pants combo. Currently researching to name Lipstick Girl. Nick
|
The Following 25 Users Say Thank You to Knickers1 For This Useful Post: |
September 18th, 2010, 09:03 AM | #929 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 6,268
Thanked 60,410 Times in 2,314 Posts
|
|
The Following 18 Users Say Thank You to Knickers1 For This Useful Post: |
September 19th, 2010, 01:48 AM | #930 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 6,268
Thanked 60,410 Times in 2,314 Posts
|
The girl in the picture is Andrea Kay. She featured in S&S from about 1973 until the end of publication in 1976. Assignments included both indoor and alfresco sets in various poses and attire (including stockings etc). Interestingly, this pose is very similar to the one held by Toni Townsend in one of my previous postings. Makes one wonder if it were the same photographer. A rather nice girl and, slightly more busty than many of the other models featured in S&S at the time. Nick
Last edited by Knickers1; September 21st, 2010 at 02:33 AM.. Reason: Grammar |
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Knickers1 For This Useful Post: |
|
|