Is There Anything You Like In Modern Porn?

[Sharkhunter]

Originally Posted by AMON

M*TA*T, F*MJ*Y and their ilk have showcased some incredible eastern beauties, taking the female form and presenting it au natural, in an age where extreme sex sometimes appears to have dominated porn.
I agree with Buttsie, Eastern Europe has saved the porn industry...

Yep, I love these sites. Add to that Ev@s G@rd3n and H3gre3's stuff.

[anotherl33cher]

Originally Posted by Cheekymonkey

No. Nothing at all. only vintage porn is worth watching!

People who say something like this surely must be too lazy to find good modern content...

I agree, the current mainstream trends are bad (tattoos, piercings, choking etc.), stuff like that used to be extreme, niche. Today you need to browse websites with "porn for women" (sexart, passion-hd, x-art) to find good old fashioned sex (which itself became niche!). Sick with tattooed models on retouched photos? Stop buying big-name magazines and visit Euro photography websites, like femjoy, met-art etc.
Same goes for girls. Eastern European newcomers are less likely to be inked and siliconed. But if you're bored with them (are you crazy?) there are American girls like the recent Penth0use Pet turned into pornstar, Lily Love. Real breasts (at least medium if not big for you), no ink/metal, even trimmed furry patch.

You just need to search harder. What reminds me of the good things:

• searching - online databases are a blessing: find a girl you want to see... doing kinky stuff you like... even with those traditional furry pussies, amen!
• digital distribution - want simply to watch some porn? no need for embarassing visits in a rental shop, welcome to the Internet
• just what you want - you don't need to buy a whole VHS tape to see that last scene with your favorite girl - today you pay for only the video scene/picture set you want
• physical medium upgrade - surely DVD/Blu-ray beats VHS? or do you still miss 8mm reels?
• footjobs going mainstream - formerly a rare sight and sometimes associated with sick fetishes I don't want to even hear about. Now it's just as normal as fucking the girl between her tits. There's nothing more pervert in a footjob than in a handjob, if one considers handjobs "indecent" you're a puritan and you shouldn't be watching porn.

Bad things are mostly style-related. But those fads hit us also beyond porn. I see tattooed, inked girls with dreadlocks riding with me on a tram, in broad daylight - not in some den of perversion. If you complain about camerawork/lighting - compare todays reality TV... bad taste is everywhere!

[mschaeffer33]

.
I like it when you see a really beautiful girl showing off her ass and tits, taut tummy and breathtakingly articulated back and shoulders. And then some meatball fucks the shit out of her.

But hey, that's me.

Also lactation among the super beautiful. But that's rare.

[pierrelm]

Originally Posted by Warren G

And what's with this squirting bullshit? Do any of you really know a girl who squirts all over when she cums like that? I never have. Seems like a new thing. Where have all the past squirters been hiding all these years?

Nah...this is mostly bullshit.

I've been lucky enough to meet women who genuinely squirt when they cum; the outstanding occasion being when one lady and I discovered her 'g-spot' for the first time - that afternoon will stay as one of the most amazing sexual memories I'll ever have.

I think that women are far more likely to feel free to explore their own sexuality these days and some of them find that their body responses can indeed include squirting and multiple orgasms. This was something I suspect used to be repressed or simply ignored years ago. Personally I find the female orgasm fascinating and never fail to be surprised and delighted by the huge variance in female response to sex; I've known women who have NEVER had a climax, either self induced or with a partner and enjoy sex without having the full orgasmic climax. There are others who cum once and then lose interest (obviously in touch with their male side!) whereas others have the capacity to be totally uninhibited and orgasm serially and with incredible intensity.

Modern porn at least acknowledges that this phenomenon exists, a big step forward from the days when a female climax was almost regarded as 'wanton' and irrelevant. As for squirting, of course the industry dramatises events and as ever some of the portrayals are fairly preposterous exercises in muscle control. At least there's plenty of choice, including some superb all female performances aimed at both male and female audiences.

[Tserellik]

I think it's quite nice question: "is modern music/pron etc. more worse than those back in old days?".
What is good?..
There is a lot more material compared to old days. Because there is a lot of bad stuff, we don't notice the good stuff so easily. Maybe because we think it's bad, it seems to be bad.
Or is it the fashion? Maybe we don't like modern fashion itself.

But I have to agree that I like vintage stuff more, for some reason. Seems to be more natural or...I don't know exactly.

Some have mentioned here that more search (in modern pron) is needed for good stuff. I agree, but I have to say that I have always came back here: you can find good stuff easier around here. Probably?

// Oh, the good thing about modern porn; there are a lot of more videos (more opportunities).

[ponky]

Well, new works are often physically very demanding... but old one's are somehow psychological provocative, more challenging on that field.

However, I think the quality is grown in previous years compared with mainstream in early 2000s, period when you see one like you've seen everything... lost decade.

Shorter story - new materials:

+ wide choise
+ dignified purchase (let's say...)
+ technical quality
+ availability of old porn

- listless, boring lesbian scenes
- disgusting "improvements" (tattoos, piercing)
- framing, camera angles
- general mood, atmosphere

[palomino]

My few cents on this:

• the lighting ! Whenever I see a bunch of screenshots with the predominant colors tending towards black, I immediately know it's gotta be from the 70's/80's !
• the video/image quality ! Well, pretty self explaining, isn't it ? That said; camera-men seem to know a million ways to screw up a scene that are not linked to the technical qualities of their equipment ! I wonder if all the porn starlets would want to charge double their wages if they knew they got screwed at least twice in each scene !
• skipping most of the plots and story lines ! It was said here before; the good old plumber, gas- or postman, pizza delivery-boy situations are sufficient for me to make for a 'plausible' reason for all the following sweat and heavy breathing !

Well, these are the points that come into my mind; yet, there are many options of modern media-technology that are still to be exploited !
E.g. : I would love to see porn being shot from a certain basic distance that would allow the viewer to control all the zooming-in ; I'm so fed up of all these 40+ minute-scenes of super-close-up pumping and never (not even for a split-second!!!) being shown the complete body of the girl !
My "being-screwed-twice"-theory from above refers to this.

So, not all is bad in modern porn - credit where credit is due !
I guess those raincoaters back in the days were willing to kiss some ugly asses to get all the possibilities that we have today !

[buttsie]

I've said it numerous times

Do your research and find who makes the kind of porn you like
and then match them to the performers not the other way around

I do exactly the same for all eras

I watched what i considered a young glamour model do her first bg scene today

Expected nothing but another modern banal forgettable scene but actually found who ever made it had avoided the usual by the numbers gameplan that can be found in both eras

No anal , No doggie , No unwanted facial , No male close-up during explosion
No prolongued close-ups associated with penetration
No tattoos , piercings , No aggressive macho bullshit

Used handcuffs , blind fold , lingerie

Most importantly she was centre of attention

I'd almost call it vanilla couple friendly porn



All over in 12.12min so no filler

Sybil A (ukraine) on some site called the white boxxx for porn doe network

In eastern european models
864x 72 bg caps link to her thread (link dead 2 9 18)
http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...&postcount=100

This is actually an interesting topic, thread got lost over the years. Why? It shouldn't have, it's a perfect topic for this forum. Thanks buttsie for resurrecting it. Before I get into my (sorry) long paragraphs, I'll answer the question. Not a big modern fan myself (my favorite stuff is from '87-'05), but the ONE modern thing I like? Nicole Aniston . Now to my tangent.

Some on here have called new porn more violent. I think you're blending two different modern eras. Maybe not technically eras, but two different "modern" periods maybe (how do you describe it!?). Somewhere in the late 90's to mid-2000s, porn began to really go gonzo and rougher. It led to hardcore companies and people like Max Hardcore, Extreme Associates, JM Productions, Anabolic/Diabolic, etc. and they were beating vanilla porn that contained plot (i.e. Vivid Pictures). But around 2008 or so, that began to die (none of those companies I mentioned are even around anymore). So if anything, porn has never been more tame. It's all high quality, well shot, cinematic, and, yes, respectful again. Think about it. Even male talent who were known to rough house girls back in the late 90's and 2000s are either not around anymore, or if they are (Manuel Ferrara), they no longer slap or rough the girls up anymore. And luckily that SOB Max Hardcore is out as well. As are all of his ilk. So I guess the confusion comes when we use "modern". I guess 2005 (when porn was at its roughest) is technically modern, but it's becoming classic as well. Not classic like 60's classic, but classic nevertheless. Time's flying. 2015 porn was waaaaay different than 2005 porn. The roughness (and the previously mentioned hardcore companies) disappeared in those 10 years.

To my point, did anyone catch what happened a few months back with Nikki Benz? I'll include the tweet below, but she claimed male talent Tony T. (who was one of the people that did slap and rough up girls in the early and mid 2000s) treated her in a rough way that she felt was forceful, and she felt raped. He was quickly ostracized and denounced for the things he used to get away with in 2004. And this was his first scene back (as an "actor"), he hadn't done porn in all those years since I believe. He came back and roughed Nikki up, thinking it was still 2004. I think that signals that rough is no longer tolerated in porn. And social media has played a big role in fact. Women can now tweet their experiences and these people will be held accountable in real time. Imagine Max Hardcore operating in today's era and climate of Twitter and Facebook.

Oh, by the way, I'm referring to "normal" porn, none of the BDSM/sadist type stuff. Regardless of eras, that's always been and going to be harsh.

Nikki's Tweet:

[buttsie]

I recently was watching one of those danni . com model Q & A bed scenes

Anita Dark asks Wanda Curtis who she least like working for



320x caps

In a flash - Salieri - because every scene was like being raped.
Anita replies i said the same when asked a few years ago.

Says it all about not jumping in and watching what ever
your favourite model might have been in.