Pat Barrington

[paulbenson]

Originally Posted by bozoclown

1965 seems pretty early for boob jobs that nice, but how else could she have visible back ribs, and still have such great gazongas?

They must be natural.
Reasoning? 1. I hate boob jobs. 2. I love her boobs. The conclusion can only be that they are natural.
If they're a fake set of silicon Bristols, then the skills of knocker surgeons have regressed appallingly in the intervening half-century.
Boob jobs:
Pat's baps:

[bozoclown]

Originally Posted by paulbenson

They must be natural.
Reasoning? 1. I hate boob jobs. 2. I love her boobs. The conclusion can only be that they are natural.

Although your logic is flawless, I think your conclusion was disputed in the Rialto Report article posted in 2015. Unfortunately it is now missing from Rialto's archives. So without evidence to the contrary, you may continue to believe what you want.

[AtticusBongman]

Originally Posted by bozoclown

Although your logic is flawless, I think your conclusion was disputed in the Rialto Report article posted in 2015. Unfortunately it is now missing from Rialto's archives. So without evidence to the contrary, you may continue to believe what you want.

I'm not completely certain, but I'm pretty sure that back when Pat was acting and dancing silicone injections, not implants, were the most common method of breast enlargement. The problem was/is the human body doesn't react well to liquid silicone injections. Compartmentalization, migration, emboli and autoimmune syndromes are some of the complications.

[initial251]

I agree silicone injections, you can see the silicone at the bottom of her breastsv and it becomes obvious a certain angles, same as Carol Doda and Babette Bardot, Christine Foushee is another, it becomes more noticeable when they lay on their backs.