Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum
Home
Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Information & Help Forum > Help Section
Best Porn Sites Live Sex Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices
Help Section If you have technical problems or questions then post or look for answers here.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old July 27th, 2011, 06:41 AM   #1
skippy1729
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 285
Thanks: 1,313
Thanked 2,907 Times in 261 Posts
skippy1729 10000+skippy1729 10000+skippy1729 10000+skippy1729 10000+skippy1729 10000+skippy1729 10000+skippy1729 10000+skippy1729 10000+skippy1729 10000+skippy1729 10000+skippy1729 10000+
Default Transparencies from scans?

Many of you will remember, or seen pictures of, the Playmate Bars in the old Playboy Clubs around the world. They were decorated with backlit transparencies of the playmate centerfolds. As I remember they were somewhat larger than the print versions. Over the years, I have never seen one of these for sale. I had the idea that I could possibly make my own using a high resolution scan.

Question 1: Is there a relationship between the resolution of the scan and the maximum practical size of a print that can be made of it without blurring and loss of detail? So if I used Old Bull scans could I get a decent full size transparency? Example: OB001__Ellen_Michaels_03-1972_LPCF.jpg 839.5KB

Question 2: What type of equipment would I need to do it myself?

Question 3: I am quessing that the answer to Question 2 is going to be cost prohibitive for the three or four transparencies that I want to make. Any suggestions to a commercial photo processing operation that I could contact?

Thanks, Skippy

PS Anybody know of centerfold scans with higher resolution than the Old Bull series that are not PEI copyright?
skippy1729 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to skippy1729 For This Useful Post:


Old July 27th, 2011, 10:23 AM   #2
monogroover
Vintage Member
 
monogroover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 505
Thanks: 1,357
Thanked 7,736 Times in 521 Posts
monogroover 25000+monogroover 25000+monogroover 25000+monogroover 25000+monogroover 25000+monogroover 25000+monogroover 25000+monogroover 25000+monogroover 25000+monogroover 25000+monogroover 25000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by skippy1729 View Post
Many of you will remember, or seen pictures of, the Playmate Bars in the old Playboy Clubs around the world. They were decorated with backlit transparencies of the playmate centerfolds. As I remember they were somewhat larger than the print versions. Over the years, I have never seen one of these for sale. I had the idea that I could possibly make my own using a high resolution scan.
Nice idea.

Quote:
Question 1: Is there a relationship between the resolution of the scan and the maximum practical size of a print that can be made of it without blurring and loss of detail? So if I used Old Bull scans could I get a decent full size transparency? Example: OB001__Ellen_Michaels_03-1972_LPCF.jpg 839.5KB
Yes, the maximum size of a print is partly a function of the resolution.

As I understand it the transparency itself is going to be full-size, and back lit - you're not looking to create (say) 35mm slides to be projected onto a surface.

This being the case you will definitely want a very high resolution scan of a very good quality source. If you were projecting an image from a slide this would be a bit more forgiving (the projected image would be a fair bit less revealing). You can get a rough impression of the pixellation and quality by viewing a portion of your image on an image viewer, and zooming in until it appears full size on your monitor.

If I'm correct in my assumption above, I have no idea on the rest of your questions - sorry.
monogroover is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to monogroover For This Useful Post:
Old July 29th, 2011, 11:50 PM   #3
deepsepia
Moderator
 
deepsepia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upper left corner
Posts: 7,205
Thanks: 47,953
Thanked 83,436 Times in 7,199 Posts
deepsepia 350000+deepsepia 350000+deepsepia 350000+deepsepia 350000+deepsepia 350000+deepsepia 350000+deepsepia 350000+deepsepia 350000+deepsepia 350000+deepsepia 350000+deepsepia 350000+
Default

Couple of things: your problem is in some ways very easy, and in some ways quite hard.

Start with the hard part: Scanning from print is going to produce poor quality. Backlit transparencies are beautiful, but they show defects in the source material very clearly. They also have a much greater contrast range than does the printed page -- that's why Kodachrome slides look so great when projected.

So ideally, you want the highest dynamic range source material you can find. A Kodachrome slide would do, or an excellent digital image. If you scan from print, you'd want someone with a lot of experience to enhance the contrast, just taking the raw unretouched scan is going to look a little shoddy . . . in particular, if its coming from print, you're going to want to filter it, the process of removing a halftone pattern is called "descreening"

As for output, you've got lots of great choices. There's the cheap DIY solution: transparency film through a high quality color printer.
http://solutions.3m.com/wps/portal/3...sparency_Film/

You can do this at a Kinko's or similar service bureau. For the best quality, though, there's the material you're familiar with from things like bus shelters: Duratrans. Its a spectacular and very durable material

There are many service bureaus that do this sort of thing, here's one:

http://www.backlitprint.com
deepsepia is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to deepsepia For This Useful Post:
Old August 1st, 2011, 03:17 AM   #4
bigbobnobody
Banned!
 
bigbobnobody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: not here
Posts: 3,018
Thanks: 4,467
Thanked 94,236 Times in 3,111 Posts
bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+bigbobnobody 350000+
Default

If what I think you're talking about, is what's in my mind, you're not talking
about a slide that projects are you? Years ago I made a few pictures to be
back lit that came out great. Of course the size was limited to the capacity
of my printer, but I have to say that they came out just fantastic and looked
great sandwiched between two pieces of glass in a glass frame. Seemingly
floating in mid air almost hologram like. Whether that's anything similar
to what you're talking about or not, Im glad you made this post, because
it's given me the creative urge to try another one! lol
bigbobnobody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 6th, 2011, 11:21 PM   #5
sgs3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1
Thanks: 6
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
sgs3 0
Default

Skippy,

there are several oldschool methods to do this that don't make sense anymore. Probably the best and easiest, is if you have a good Epson (or Canon equivalent) printer, you can use Epson CrystalClear Film to print your scans (I recommend 300 dpi or higher) from your computer to the film. Using the LPCF or Old Bull, you could definitely get a nice size transparency.

Unless you know somebody at the lab, do not take copyright images to the lab and ask them to make copies onto Duratrans or other media.
sgs3 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sgs3 For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33 AM.






vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.1 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.