Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum
Home
Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Discussion & Talk Forum > General Discussion & News > Politics, Current Affairs, Religion Threads
Best Porn Sites Live Sex Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices
Politics, Current Affairs, Religion Threads Post here for all Politics, Current Affairs, Religion Threads


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old August 17th, 2019, 07:13 AM   #7311
scoundrel
Super Moderator
 
scoundrel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: England
Posts: 26,237
Thanks: 162,389
Thanked 278,408 Times in 26,182 Posts
scoundrel 1000000+scoundrel 1000000+scoundrel 1000000+scoundrel 1000000+scoundrel 1000000+scoundrel 1000000+scoundrel 1000000+scoundrel 1000000+scoundrel 1000000+scoundrel 1000000+scoundrel 1000000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by palo5 View Post
Of course he did, because they stopped paying and stole what wasn't theirs. What would you have done?
Good question. I might have taken away Yanukovych's gold toilet seat as a first step and made him defecate into a carrier bag. If he couldn't pay for the gas, he couldn't afford a gold thunderbox.

Somewhere along the line, Russia's relationship with Ukraine has failed disastrously. I think in Putin's shoes I would want to rebuild it. That is a long term project and will require reciprocity from the Ukraine side, who have very good reasons to be both hostile and suspicious. But these two countries are strongly linked by history, culture and traditions and should be allies.

In order to gain that outcome, I'd work something out with Ukraine about the gas supply.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
scoundrel is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to scoundrel For This Useful Post:
Old August 17th, 2019, 07:19 AM   #7312
scoundrel
Super Moderator
 
scoundrel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: England
Posts: 26,237
Thanks: 162,389
Thanked 278,408 Times in 26,182 Posts
scoundrel 1000000+scoundrel 1000000+scoundrel 1000000+scoundrel 1000000+scoundrel 1000000+scoundrel 1000000+scoundrel 1000000+scoundrel 1000000+scoundrel 1000000+scoundrel 1000000+scoundrel 1000000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by palo5 View Post
I think they're both in EU "bad-books" for undemocratic practices and refusal to co-operate with agreed refugee policy. I don't know what the undemocratic practices are in Hungary, but in Poland it has to do with politically appointed supreme court judges who will support a government nationalist agenda. The EU have not found a way to resolve this yet
Just for clarification, did Poland and Hungary agree with this agreed refugee policy, or were they merely told to follow it because other EU countries had agreed it while Poland and Hungary had disagreed?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
scoundrel is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to scoundrel For This Useful Post:
Old August 17th, 2019, 08:46 AM   #7313
palo5
Former Staff
 
palo5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 16,579
Thanks: 452,836
Thanked 222,657 Times in 16,567 Posts
palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scoundrel View Post
Just for clarification, did Poland and Hungary agree with this agreed refugee policy, or were they merely told to follow it because other EU countries had agreed it while Poland and Hungary had disagreed?
I'm not a migration expert, but this page will tell you what Member States have agreed to. My understanding is that they are under an obligation to accept migrants, which is why the EU are suing Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic for non-compliance. But from then on it gets complicated, particularly when there is a crisis, such as now

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsh...gration-policy
palo5 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to palo5 For This Useful Post:
Old August 17th, 2019, 09:22 AM   #7314
dohupa
Beer, porn and whatnot...
 
dohupa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Athens
Posts: 3,643
Thanks: 5,623
Thanked 73,135 Times in 3,245 Posts
dohupa 350000+dohupa 350000+dohupa 350000+dohupa 350000+dohupa 350000+dohupa 350000+dohupa 350000+dohupa 350000+dohupa 350000+dohupa 350000+dohupa 350000+
Default

Looking at the migration crisis from the Orban/Salvini standpoint is hypocritical, at best. The problem will worsen gradually due to the dramatic climate changes (which are inevitable) and will cause according to UN estimates, hundreds of millions from South East Asia and Africa migrating and trying to reach Europe.

Right now, Erdogan keeps 3 million Syrian refugees in his bare hands as a human nuclear bomb. Should he decide to detonate it, there will be something the world has never seen before.

Also, Egypt seems pretty stable at the moment. If it fails though due to some political turmoil, where do you think 80 million will try to go? Australia?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
dohupa is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to dohupa For This Useful Post:
Old August 17th, 2019, 09:57 AM   #7315
jokerman
Internet Defective
 
jokerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: England
Posts: 4,834
Thanks: 72,872
Thanked 71,262 Times in 4,832 Posts
jokerman 350000+jokerman 350000+jokerman 350000+jokerman 350000+jokerman 350000+jokerman 350000+jokerman 350000+jokerman 350000+jokerman 350000+jokerman 350000+jokerman 350000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by palo5 View Post
Of course he did, because they stopped paying and stole what wasn't theirs. What would you have done?
voted for comrade palo. of course.
__________________
I am not a number I'm a free man.
jokerman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to jokerman For This Useful Post:
Old August 18th, 2019, 09:11 AM   #7316
haunted
Vintage Member
 
haunted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,105
Thanks: 25,960
Thanked 111,059 Times in 5,206 Posts
haunted 500000+haunted 500000+haunted 500000+haunted 500000+haunted 500000+haunted 500000+haunted 500000+haunted 500000+haunted 500000+haunted 500000+haunted 500000+
Default

US National security adviser John Bolton speaks about a post Brexit US-UK trade deal
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...ls-says-bolton

House speaker Nancy Pelosi also comments
https://www.politico.eu/article/nanc...s-irish-peace/
__________________
Somebody calls you, you answer quite slowly,
A girl with kaleidoscope eyes

Last edited by haunted; August 20th, 2019 at 10:45 PM..
haunted is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to haunted For This Useful Post:
Old August 18th, 2019, 02:16 PM   #7317
frankoboff
Vintage Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 903
Thanks: 2,104
Thanked 25,363 Times in 884 Posts
frankoboff 100000+frankoboff 100000+frankoboff 100000+frankoboff 100000+frankoboff 100000+frankoboff 100000+frankoboff 100000+frankoboff 100000+frankoboff 100000+frankoboff 100000+frankoboff 100000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by haunted View Post
US National security adviser John Bolton speaks about post Brexit US-UK trade deal
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...ls-says-bolton

House speaker Nancy Pelosi alos comments
https://www.politico.eu/article/nanc...s-irish-peace/
Re: Bolton- The American right have been pushing the idea of a new trade bloc that bypasses the need for the WTO. A caveat of any US-UK trade deal might be that we agree to become part of a new US-centric trading bloc and the UK having to drop standards on food and other imports and other things that prevent the US from competing in the UK marketplace.
frankoboff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to frankoboff For This Useful Post:
Old August 18th, 2019, 04:56 PM   #7318
palo5
Former Staff
 
palo5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 16,579
Thanks: 452,836
Thanked 222,657 Times in 16,567 Posts
palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frankoboff View Post
A caveat of any US-UK trade deal might be that we agree to become part of a new US-centric trading bloc and the UK having to drop standards on food and other imports and other things that prevent the US from competing in the UK marketplace.
From what I read, the areas they're worried about are agricultural products and anything to do with health. Fwiw, I think they're right, and so are you

Not that they don't know it, but the better strategy must be to go for separate deals in other sectors, not one big package. That way they can still get benefits for both countries
palo5 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to palo5 For This Useful Post:
Old August 18th, 2019, 05:15 PM   #7319
frankoboff
Vintage Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 903
Thanks: 2,104
Thanked 25,363 Times in 884 Posts
frankoboff 100000+frankoboff 100000+frankoboff 100000+frankoboff 100000+frankoboff 100000+frankoboff 100000+frankoboff 100000+frankoboff 100000+frankoboff 100000+frankoboff 100000+frankoboff 100000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by palo5 View Post
From what I read, the areas they're worried about are agricultural products and anything to do with health. Fwiw, I think they're right, and so are you

Not that they don't know it, but the better strategy must be to go for separate deals in other sectors, not one big package. That way they can still get benefits for both countries
Yes Bolton talking on a sector by sector basis but that's how trade deals are done. Why does he need say it?

The sectors they're interested in are agriculture and healthcare, the rest are of a lot less consequence.
frankoboff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to frankoboff For This Useful Post:
Old August 18th, 2019, 05:29 PM   #7320
palo5
Former Staff
 
palo5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 16,579
Thanks: 452,836
Thanked 222,657 Times in 16,567 Posts
palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+palo5 1000000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by frankoboff View Post
Yes Bolton talking on a sector by sector basis but that's how trade deals are done. Why does he need say it?

The sectors they're interested in are agriculture and healthcare, the rest are of a lot less consequence.
Good question. But it's probably better for the British if they follow that strategy -- just leave out food and anything to do with health, no matter what pressure they get

I must say, I think their farmers will be screwed, almost whatever happens. Very bad news for a country that can't feed itself. Do any of their bright lights have an answer to this, apart from "zero tariffs" which is something only an imbecile could say?
palo5 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to palo5 For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 08:55 AM.






vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.1 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.