Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum
Home
Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Information & Help Forum > Help Section
Best Porn Sites Live Sex Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices
Help Section If you have technical problems or questions then post or look for answers here.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old November 30th, 2009, 05:50 AM   #21
bygoneguy
Veteran Member
 
bygoneguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,202
Thanks: 1,923
Thanked 49,392 Times in 1,163 Posts
bygoneguy 250000+bygoneguy 250000+bygoneguy 250000+bygoneguy 250000+bygoneguy 250000+bygoneguy 250000+bygoneguy 250000+bygoneguy 250000+bygoneguy 250000+bygoneguy 250000+bygoneguy 250000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DubSalute View Post
When you capture in actual HD resolution then it would make sense for me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DubSalute View Post
IMO the better the camera the better you can capture.


I have had a several discussions with some people who really are experts in this area, and that is what they always say - it is all about the quality of the camera. And if cameras were all equal, you wouldn't get such wide range in prices for them.

When I switched from a SD digital camcorder (in the USD $1000 range) to a broadcast level camera the difference in quality was staggering. The camera I use now when new retailed for USD $7000 and the lense USD $3000.

A HD camera and that blackmagic board above will allow you to capture off the film frame at 1080 or 720p. The fact there is more detail being captured should mean a better transfer.

But like SD cameras, HD cameras will have low-end and and high-end models. Right now I have a very high-end SD camera so jumping to a low-end HD camera might not be the right move for me.


Quote:
Originally Posted by DubSalute
What i personaly however find a bit of a crime is some people cropping the old films to fit the 16:9 resolutions.
Agree, I have never understood this. The films were never released in a widescreen format. Do people really have a hard time watching porn just because there are two black lines down each the side of widescreen TV because it has a 4:3 aspect?
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

I have updated my posts with better versions and most without a watermark see my
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
As in the past I am offering free 8mm/16mm film transfers for VEF members and will return the films by FedEx at my own expense
bygoneguy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to bygoneguy For This Useful Post:
Old November 30th, 2009, 06:09 AM   #22
bygoneguy
Veteran Member
 
bygoneguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,202
Thanks: 1,923
Thanked 49,392 Times in 1,163 Posts
bygoneguy 250000+bygoneguy 250000+bygoneguy 250000+bygoneguy 250000+bygoneguy 250000+bygoneguy 250000+bygoneguy 250000+bygoneguy 250000+bygoneguy 250000+bygoneguy 250000+bygoneguy 250000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DARPA View Post
Wouldn't you do just about as well if you took the SD video conversion and shot that out to Blu-Ray instead of standard DVD?
No, because you would be upscaling to HD and would lose sharpness of the picture. An 8mm film captured in 1080 (or 720p) and shown on a hi-def screen 'should' look better than a loop captured in SD and upscaled. Just how much better I don't know.

But while on this subject, hi-def should also help to get better film 'stills' off the film frames. While I can't do film transfers in hi-def yet, I can get a HD camera and capture focused still images right off the emulsion side of the film frame.

I think I just gave myself a new year project - I am going to hire a high-end HD camera and capture stills with it, and then capture the same still images with my current SD camera we can make some comparisons.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

I have updated my posts with better versions and most without a watermark see my
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
|
As in the past I am offering free 8mm/16mm film transfers for VEF members and will return the films by FedEx at my own expense
bygoneguy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to bygoneguy For This Useful Post:
Old December 1st, 2009, 09:52 PM   #23
DARPA
Veteran Member
 
DARPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Trapped inside a scanner
Posts: 3,502
Thanks: 4,331
Thanked 61,985 Times in 3,412 Posts
DARPA 250000+DARPA 250000+DARPA 250000+DARPA 250000+DARPA 250000+DARPA 250000+DARPA 250000+DARPA 250000+DARPA 250000+DARPA 250000+DARPA 250000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bygoneguy View Post
I think I just gave myself a new year project - I am going to hire a high-end HD camera and capture stills with it, and then capture the same still images with my current SD camera we can make some comparisons.
That would be very interesting to know.
DARPA is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DARPA For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:18 AM.






vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.1 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.