|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
Politics, Current Affairs, Religion Threads Post here for all Politics, Current Affairs, Religion Threads |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
August 7th, 2017, 06:44 PM | #4171 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 2
Thanks: 3
Thanked 8 Times in 2 Posts
|
a very interesting thread with a lot of inaccuracies from a lot of fringe loony toon websites. that said the initial thread should have been who are the worst presidents for what we all can agree on.... the preservation of porn. the current 45 and the attorney general are anti porn. no debate here , go to youtube and see for yourself. the evangelicals and the concerned women for america along with other pro family groups worked hard to get their man into the white house. they want payback and most of it will be in the selection of religious minded judges who find it extremely disturbing that you sit in front of your computer screen jacking off. good presidents are the ones who select aclu approved civil libertarians. they select a attorney general that views porn as a free speech issue already settled and no need to review it. now all you experienced keyboard historians do the research and draw your own conclusions. remember think about your dick. .
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to jackrabbitcafe For This Useful Post: |
October 24th, 2017, 06:04 PM | #4172 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Mice Planet
Posts: 3,882
Thanks: 15,974
Thanked 29,726 Times in 3,826 Posts
|
Quote:
The most surprising is that this guy who is considered as a war criminal by the human rights organisation "Amnesty international" never faced any juges. That's such an hypocrisy. In comparison, Tony Blair has a lot more trouble with his own citizens. |
|
November 12th, 2017, 03:25 PM | #4173 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Oakland, California, United States. I have a beautful view of the BART tracks and I-980
Posts: 8,955
Thanks: 103,061
Thanked 151,470 Times in 8,946 Posts
|
Quote:
However, I came to realize that there is more to the man than I had realized when I discovered his role in establishing the long overdue National Museum of African American History and Culture. Once again, I will repeat that no American president since Warren Harding can match the records of ineptitude of 19th century presidents Pierce, Buchanan, and others. The current occupant of the office is showing considerable promise of plumbing new depths, however. |
|
December 28th, 2017, 12:00 AM | #4174 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 724
Thanks: 22,659
Thanked 9,745 Times in 726 Posts
|
I'm from the UK, so this is a view from outside the US.
I am surprised so many recent presidents were mentioned; their misdemeanors seem quite pale compared to earlier ones; consider President Grant. This is a difficult question to answer, as there are many candidates. My final 3: Warren Gamaliel Harding James Buchanan Ulysses S Grant I am a bit annoyed that the competition is so fierce that Richard Milhouse Nixon cannot get in it. But when he wasn't corrupting elections and breaking the law on multiple issues, he did do the odd useful thing. It is also sad that Nixon was, due to his resignation, was never formally impeached and convicted. I think that might have been a better outcome for the USA |
December 30th, 2017, 04:45 PM | #4175 | |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: It's a London Thing....
Posts: 23,468
Thanks: 141,991
Thanked 228,160 Times in 23,504 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
"I've had it with them, I've had it with you, I've had it with ALL THIS - I WANT ROOM SERVICE! I want the club sandwich, I want the cold Mexican beer, I want a $10,000-a-night hooker!" Johnny Mnemonic (1995) |
|
December 30th, 2017, 05:09 PM | #4176 | |
El Super Moderador
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Adoptive Monkey Hanger
Posts: 58,134
Thanks: 772,635
Thanked 855,649 Times in 57,562 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. If in doubt, Just ask Yourself What Would Max Do ? It is a porn site,But its a Classy porn site. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
January 15th, 2019, 08:05 AM | #4177 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Seattle AKA LV426
Posts: 403
Thanks: 341
Thanked 10,352 Times in 385 Posts
|
Individual 1 - It isn't close.
Richard Nixon: He was so far ahead of his time in certain areas that no one has really come close. His foreign policy has never been matched in regards to the then USSR and China. Though he did end Vietnam, it arguably took at least a year longer than it should have. He and Kissinger actually thought they had a deal done about a year into his 1st term but he and Kissinger relaxed on that issue switching over to the 2 major opponents. That was a mistake, as the deal was not closed. 1st Nuclear arms treaty, 1st visit by a President to both capitals. If you have not watched this documentary, I cannot recommend it highly enough Carter: Was he mostly ineffectual? Yes. Except he did what no other President had been able to do: Camp David Accords And the way he handled Three Mile Island is overlooked as well.
__________________
MMMM Patti |
January 23rd, 2019, 07:35 AM | #4178 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Upper left corner
Posts: 7,205
Thanks: 47,953
Thanked 83,438 Times in 7,199 Posts
|
Quote:
As you observe, he managed to do the impossible-- got a peace treaty signed. He inherited the post-Vietnam mess, and unlike other politicians tried to change course in logical way. A few really good ideas that Carter had: 1) We should conserve energy; that's the shortest road to energy independence from the Middle East 2) we should develop new petroleum technologies to produce more of what we have 3) we should stand for our values in the world. I think there are all sorts of unappreciated benefits from Carter's policies. Camp David is well known, but how about Korean democracy? Korea began is move from a pretty nasty authoritarian military government to a democracy because of Carter's pressure. People forget that. The US is today self sufficient in energy, because of non-traditional energy production. Carter's "synfuels corporation" was the beginning of investment of new technologies to get more out of difficult geology. He was distinctly Southern, distinctly Christian (still teaches Sunday school) and he was a progressive. . . the Dems have since lost the capacity to talk to Christians and Southerners. and finally, Carter was a genuinely decent human being. Its not necessarily the most important thing in a President, but its not nothing either |
|
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to deepsepia For This Useful Post: |
January 23rd, 2019, 06:32 PM | #4179 | |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Seattle AKA LV426
Posts: 403
Thanks: 341
Thanked 10,352 Times in 385 Posts
|
Quote:
>Habitat For Humanity. And he didn't just donate Money, he was well known for showing up frequently and helping to build the homes. >Won the Nobel Peace Prize for his work toward finding peace. >Opened the Carter Center in Egypt, only closing it after it became apparent that Egypt was not really interested in their help to find peace. >Continued his work in North Korea >Outspoken critic of administrations of both parties. I concur, history will and should look at him as one of the most underrated presidents. in our countries history.
__________________
MMMM Patti |
|
January 23rd, 2019, 07:01 PM | #4180 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: North Wales
Posts: 3,637
Thanks: 32,358
Thanked 31,826 Times in 3,566 Posts
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Meini Again For This Useful Post: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|