Pandora Peaks

urzu6 · February 19th, 2017, 08:38 AM

The first time I see Pandora was on Striptease. I am still amazing not only for her hot body and big boobs, but also by her beautiful face and green eyes. =O

But I wonder why she got so few professional photoshoots, she totally deserved better pics. I mean, apart of the low quality, her locations were mainly regular backyard gardens and cheap hotel rooms.

She still looks gorgeous but by the fame she got I think she was "wasted" on her best years on almost candid quality sets. Do you know any reason for this ?
Here I post two examples to make my point.

jimmyz22 · January 14th, 2018, 11:21 PM

That's her....no big boobies

salpecam · February 16th, 2018, 04:27 PM

tragic... would have suited growing old with them still in situ

ellias · February 16th, 2018, 05:14 PM

she was "wasted" on her best years on almost candid quality sets. Do you know any reason for this ?

I belonged to her club in the old days, early 90s, and all her images were of very low quality. Even when cameras made an enormous leap in quality, her pics were still lousy as she had her friend "photographer" use the same dumpy camera with low specs. She never used proper lighting, preferring to use the highest ASA rating on the digital camera which produced grainy results. When she switched to her new club alliance her pics were still amateurish in nature. The reason.... cheaper that way.

Always follow the money for most answers in life.

February 19th, 2017, 08:38 AM	#1
urzu6 Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 190 Thanks: 405 Thanked 2,592 Times in 175 Posts	So few professional sets ??? The first time I see Pandora was on Striptease. I am still amazing not only for her hot body and big boobs, but also by her beautiful face and green eyes. =O But I wonder why she got so few professional photoshoots, she totally deserved better pics. I mean, apart of the low quality, her locations were mainly regular backyard gardens and cheap hotel rooms. She still looks gorgeous but by the fame she got I think she was "wasted" on her best years on almost candid quality sets. Do you know any reason for this ? Here I post two examples to make my point.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

January 14th, 2018, 11:21 PM	#2
jimmyz22 Member Join Date: Dec 2017 Posts: 11 Thanks: 111 Thanked 21 Times in 5 Posts	That's her....no big boobies

February 16th, 2018, 04:27 PM	#3
salpecam Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Leeds, England Posts: 62 Thanks: 3,494 Thanked 551 Times in 56 Posts	tragic... would have suited growing old with them still in situ

February 16th, 2018, 05:14 PM	#4
ellias Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 354 Thanks: 6,473 Thanked 1,980 Times in 313 Posts	she was "wasted" on her best years on almost candid quality sets. Do you know any reason for this ? I belonged to her club in the old days, early 90s, and all her images were of very low quality. Even when cameras made an enormous leap in quality, her pics were still lousy as she had her friend "photographer" use the same dumpy camera with low specs. She never used proper lighting, preferring to use the highest ASA rating on the digital camera which produced grainy results. When she switched to her new club alliance her pics were still amateurish in nature. The reason.... cheaper that way. Always follow the money for most answers in life.