|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Mark Forums Read |
General Erotica Post here for Erotica that is neither or both Vintage and Modern |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
October 5th, 2007, 07:33 AM | #1 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Third rock from the Sun
Posts: 369
Thanks: 1,100
Thanked 11,733 Times in 412 Posts
|
Porn production "pet hates"
What are yours - if any?
Mine are (in films) intercut scenes and (in pictures) smaller photos (espeiclally genital close-ups) superimposed over larger photos.
__________________
Avatar: Own personal Polaroid. Ex-girlfriend (1990s). Happy Days! |
The Following 26 Users Say Thank You to Toxic Dog For This Useful Post: |
|
October 5th, 2007, 09:26 PM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 130
Thanks: 1,227
Thanked 1,130 Times in 88 Posts
|
Re: Porn production "pet hates"
I'm surprised this has not had any replies. Good topic.
In movies I'd have to say it's bad camera work that pisses me off. Too many cuts, too much movement. Just let it be. Set things up and let us enjoy the sight of a sexy woman getting FUCKED. In pics things don't annoy me so much but models that are told to look at the camera and SMILE, I mean, what's all that about. Seems to be a Euro/German thing. Here's the news: nobody smiles during sex, a lecherous grin is as close as it gets, but most off the time expressions speak of filthy thoughts and wicked sensations, and that's appealing to voyeurs! Obviously fake cum is a DUMB thing. Pull-up stockings, g-strings/thongs, silly platform shoes. |
The Following 22 Users Say Thank You to rachelx For This Useful Post: |
October 28th, 2008, 09:03 PM | #3 | |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Left Coast, Canada
Posts: 677
Thanks: 90,355
Thanked 8,094 Times in 645 Posts
|
Oh, I don't know...
Quote:
This voyeur can (just off the top of my head) think of two stars that seemed to be always smiling while getting "FUCKED": Juliet Anderson and Veronica Hart both seemed to be very happified in those scenes. Aunt Peg regularly laughed. Mind you, I'd agree that both of these examples speak more of 'filthy thoughts and wicked sensations', just as you said. And, for sure neither smiled for the camera, but for the pleasure.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Last edited by OtisOne; November 1st, 2008 at 06:49 PM.. |
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to OtisOne For This Useful Post: |
October 31st, 2008, 09:46 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New Jersey, USA and Manila, Philippines
Posts: 305
Thanks: 3,658
Thanked 3,759 Times in 303 Posts
|
Thread Summary
Langin mentioned cameramen running their mouths while filming the action. Amen, brother - I can't stand that.
Cohiba cited bad editing as a recurring theme here. At least two posters (classicporno, buggerlugs) mentioned guys jerking-off in a woman's face instead of her giving the guy a handjob or blowjob to completion. Yeah, definitely. At least two posters (ymcba321, Derwent) drew a blank when contemplating this apparent major preoccupation with spitting. Absolutely. At least three posters (ymcba321, hayt2009, grindcore666) voiced their displeasure regarding the total lack of pubic hair in 99.99% of the genre. This I couldn't possibly agree with more, as I do not respond to shaved cunt at all, hence my decision two or three years ago to abandon American porn all together in favor of Japanese adult video (in addition to the vintage stuff, of course). The most frequent complaint of all: at least nine posters complained that we see far too many close-ups, often, more specifically, close-ups of the guy's face. Absolutely no question. Once in a while, you'll be given a long shot, one that shows you everyone in the room, and what they're engaged in, but these images are fleeting at best. Another recurring theme pertains to overacting: faking orgasms, fake moans, blatant cliche one-liners (Rob427, easypeasy, jrk86, xcruciusx2, 27cows) At least two posters griped about ubiquitous hideous tattoos (margib, steamjon). I'm in full agreement. At least five complained of plastic surgery, silicone, and ugly breast implants (Rob427, jsandy, margib, bigerc, steamjon). Absofuckinlutely. My favorite quote from the entire thread comes from margib: ".... I never watch modern porn: I happen to like erotica, and it need not be too explicit. In fact a simple glimpse of a woman's nakedness for a very short time can be very exciting, whereas twenty minutes of pounding is just like watching a butcher at work in his shop!" This is excellent. What turns me on is nudity: a natural woman (silicone free, tattoo free, piercing free, with a beautiful full bush) standing in front of the camera! What a concept. Simple full-frontal nudity, which, ironically, is almost impossible to view. As soon as a woman begins to masturbate, she is effectively hiding herself, as are her male partners the second they take over the screen. Last edited by edgarcasey; October 31st, 2008 at 10:01 PM.. |
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to edgarcasey For This Useful Post: |
November 5th, 2008, 03:56 PM | #5 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,112
Thanks: 51,073
Thanked 282,462 Times in 13,802 Posts
|
Badly taken photographs get me annoyed. I want to see her entire head, bum and/or puss properly in shot - not out of focus. And the worse is when parts of her are not even in the frame.
I've had to skip downloading hundreds of pictures simply because of shoddy camera work. |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Oswald For This Useful Post: |
November 16th, 2010, 11:22 AM | #6 | ||
Vintage Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 2,435
Thanks: 62,015
Thanked 27,437 Times in 2,401 Posts
|
Quote:
Porn films used to be made by filmmakers. Now they're made by some guy who, if you're lucky, owns a tripod. Even if the camera can be steadied, you then have to look at the same shot (including genital close-ups) for three minutes at a time. What a bunch of amateurs. Quote:
Maybe in the minority. Definitely not alone.
__________________
The guy formerly known as that guy, now known as this guy. |
||
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to USBPepsi For This Useful Post: |
October 6th, 2007, 03:43 PM | #7 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,059
Thanks: 28,052
Thanked 27,273 Times in 3,004 Posts
|
Re: Porn production "pet hates"
Intercut scenes bug me, I think this practice ruins the scenes and the movie. However It gives me the opportunity(as a poster) to split and then join the cuts, then post the scene as an uninterrupted whole;* which would not be seen otherwise. I do that alot, it's fun.* *
|
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to BondJmsBond For This Useful Post: |
October 6th, 2007, 04:37 PM | #8 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver, B.C.
Posts: 4,069
Thanks: 4,274
Thanked 189,136 Times in 4,171 Posts
|
Re: Porn production "pet hates"
One thing (and I know this a HUGE part of it for some folks): SHOES!!! (as in: I hate a hot scene or photo ruined by the model wearing heels) >.
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Mr.Bungle For This Useful Post: |
October 7th, 2007, 04:26 PM | #9 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8
Thanks: 60
Thanked 64 Times in 5 Posts
|
Re: Porn production "pet hates"
Quite the opposite for me. Keep the shoes ON! Preferably pumps and whilst wearing sheer stockings :P
I also hate the way the camera cuts and moves around sometime. Many a potentially amazing clip has been ruined like this. I guess it's all about taste though. |
The Following 28 Users Say Thank You to Icarus46 For This Useful Post: | Acanthus2003, billybunter, bill_the_cat, BLACK_NYLONS, butafors, Cheekymonkey, dbailey, haVEFun here, hemo30, ichabod, ifr2lax, ikeswanson, Jake Gittes, jomama, magnus77, mikeydrew, MohNom, onelucky1, Oswald, palo5, palomino, PornLovingCpl, sammler, Sir Spender, Starkos, Tester2010, trailmaster, USBPepsi |
August 6th, 2008, 04:35 PM | #10 |
Veteran Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 13,112
Thanks: 51,073
Thanked 282,462 Times in 13,802 Posts
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Oswald For This Useful Post: |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|