Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum
Home
Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Discussion & Talk Forum > General Discussion & News > Politics, Current Affairs, Religion Threads
Best Porn Sites Live Sex Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices
Politics, Current Affairs, Religion Threads Post here for all Politics, Current Affairs, Religion Threads


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old January 11th, 2018, 10:03 PM   #2871
chupachups
Vintage Member
 
chupachups's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,056
Thanks: 13,387
Thanked 6,316 Times in 1,013 Posts
chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tamsmith View Post
OOPS I think you have got that very wrong my friend.
I don't think I am very wrong

"Scotland has voted in favour of the UK staying in the EU by 62% to 38% - with all 32 council areas backing Remain."
chupachups is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to chupachups For This Useful Post:
Old January 11th, 2018, 10:04 PM   #2872
chupachups
Vintage Member
 
chupachups's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,056
Thanks: 13,387
Thanked 6,316 Times in 1,013 Posts
chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bacchus61 View Post
"Countries marked on the map in purple do not have a minimum wage."

including italy, as I pointed out previously

what has gdp got to do with it ?
chupachups is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to chupachups For This Useful Post:
Old January 11th, 2018, 10:08 PM   #2873
bacchus61
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 51
Thanks: 27
Thanked 237 Times in 51 Posts
bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chupachups View Post
Are you going to post a correction regarding the immigration criteria for essential workers and the nurse example ?

do you also now understand why the NHS, in the way it is provided, makes the UK the primary destination for EU migration ?

as for council accomodation, yes there are rules, but there are ways to game the system...made homeless through your own actions is a good one, thats how people jump the queue. councils have a legal responsibility to house the homeless
No I will not say that the NHS is in the state that it is by the way that it is provided, it is in the way that it is run and the underfunding that has take place over many decades and governments that has lead to this situation.
I had an employee who voted brexit because she and her partner who have never paid tax etc. were overlooked for council accommodation in favour of a Polish couple who were both working in the UK and paying their due taxes, Who's right?
bacchus61 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bacchus61 For This Useful Post:
Old January 11th, 2018, 10:10 PM   #2874
tamsmith
Veteran Member
 
tamsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Coming close to the Slippery Slope.
Posts: 7,800
Thanks: 77,915
Thanked 280,411 Times in 9,078 Posts
tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chupachups View Post

as for council accomodation, yes there are rules, but there are ways to game the system...made homeless through your own actions is a good one, thats how people jump the queue. councils have a legal responsibility to house the homeless
I wont name my local council but they have just built homes for people in need. Which of course, is the government requirement. However it is not available to the homeless only "migrants and those with addiction problems".
tamsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to tamsmith For This Useful Post:
Old January 11th, 2018, 10:12 PM   #2875
bacchus61
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 51
Thanks: 27
Thanked 237 Times in 51 Posts
bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chupachups View Post
"Countries marked on the map in purple do not have a minimum wage."

including italy, as I pointed out previously

what has gdp got to do with it ?
Your right, sorry
here's the wiki info:
Main statistical findings

Variations in national minimum wages

Minimum wages in the EU Member States ranged from EUR 235 to EUR 1 999 per month in July 2017

In July 2017, 22 out of the 28 EU Member States (Denmark, Italy, Cyprus, Austria, Finland and Sweden were the exceptions) had a national minimum wage, as did all of the EU candidate countries (Montenegro, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Albania, Serbia and Turkey). As of 1 July 2017, monthly minimum wages varied widely across the Member States, from EUR 235 in Bulgaria to EUR 1 999 in Luxembourg (see Figure 1).

Compared with 2008, minimum wages (expressed in euro) were higher in 2017 in every EU Member State having a national minimum wage, except in Greece where they were 14 % lower. Between 2008 and 2017, minimum wages approximately doubled in Bulgaria (an increase of 109 %) and the rate of change was even higher in Romania (132 %). In addition, the three Baltic Member States — Estonia (69 %), Latvia (67 %) and Lithuania (64 %) — as well as Slovakia (62 %), also recorded significant increases.

In 2008, among EU candidate countries, only Turkey had a national minimum wage and by 2017 this had increased by 34 % compared with the July 2008 level of EUR 331.

Based on the level of their national gross monthly minimum wages expressed in euro terms, EU Member States covered by this data collection may be classified into three different groups; non-member countries are shown in Figure 1 as a separate group.
•Group 1, where national minimum wages were lower than EUR 500 per month in July 2017. The EU Member States in this group included: Bulgaria, Romania, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Croatia, Estonia and Poland; their national minimum wages ranged from EUR 235 in Bulgaria to EUR 473 in Poland.
•Group 2, where national minimum wages were higher than EUR 500 but lower than EUR 1 000 per month in July 2017. The EU Member States in this group included: Portugal, Greece, Malta, Slovenia and Spain; their national minimum wages ranged from EUR 650 in Portugal to EUR 826 in Spain.
•Group 3, where national minimum wages were higher than EUR 1 000 per month in July 2017. The EU Member States in this group included: the United Kingdom (data for January 2017), France, Germany, the Netherlands (data for January 2017), Belgium, Ireland and Luxembourg; their national minimum wages ranged from EUR 1 397 in the United Kingdom to EUR 1 999 in Luxembourg.
•All of the EU candidate countries had minimum wages that were similar to those in group 1, ranging from EUR 181 in Albania (data for January 2017) to EUR 443 in Turkey. The level in the United States (with a national minimum wage of EUR 1 101 per month) fell within the range shown in group 3.

For those EU Member States with national minimum wages that are outside of the euro area (Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Croatia, Hungary, Poland, Romania and the United Kingdom), as well as EU candidate countries and the United States, the level of minimum wages and the ranking expressed in euro terms are influenced by the exchange rates that are used to convert from national currencies to euro.

Minimum wages expressed in purchasing power standards

The gap between countries in the level of minimum wages was considerably smaller once price level differences were taken into account

Figure 2 compares gross minimum wages taking into account differences in price levels by applying purchasing power parities (PPPs) for household final consumption expenditure; as might be expected, adjusting for differences in price levels reduces the variation between countries. Based on the level of their national gross monthly minimum wages expressed in PPS terms, the EU Member States covered by this data collection may be classified into three different groups; again, non-member countries are shown as a separate group in Figure 2.
•Group 1, where national minimum wages were lower than PPS 600 in July 2017. The EU Member States in this group included: Bulgaria and Latvia; their national minimum wages ranged from PPS 491 in Bulgaria to PPS 537 in Latvia.
•Group 2, where national minimum wages were at least PPS 600 but lower than PPS 1 050 in July 2017. There were 13 EU Member States in this group, namely: Lithuania, Croatia, Estonia, the Czech Republic, Romania, Slovakia, Hungary, Portugal, Greece, Poland, Malta, Spain and Slovenia; their national minimum wages ranged from PPS 600 in Lithuania to PPS 986 in Slovenia.
•Group 3, where national minimum wages were higher than PPS 1 050 in July 2017. The EU Member States in this group included: the United Kingdom (data for January 2017), Ireland, France, the Netherlands (data for January 2017), Belgium, Germany and Luxembourg; their national minimum wages ranged from PPS 1 210 in the United Kingdom to PPS 1 615 in Luxembourg.
•With the exception of Turkey, the four remaining EU candidate countries had minimum wages expressed in PPS that were similar to those in group 1, ranging from PPS 358 in Albania to EUR 532 in Montenegro. Turkey (with a national minimum wage of PPS 882), as well as the United States (PPS 1 011) had minimum wages expressed in PPS that were similar to those in group 2.

The EU Member States in Group 1, with relatively low minimum wages in euro terms, tended to have lower price levels and therefore relatively higher minimum wages when expressed in purchasing power standard (PPS). On the other hand, Member States in Group 3, with relatively high minimum wages in euro terms, tended to have higher price levels and their minimum wages in PPS terms were therefore often lower. This adjustment for price levels has the effect of partly smoothing the distinct breaks between the three different groups of Member States that were identified when minimum wages were ranked in euro terms.

The disparities in minimum wage rates between the EU Member States were reduced from a ratio of 1:8.5 in euro (meaning that the highest minimum wage was 8.5 times as high as the lowest one, expressed in euro) to a ratio of 1:3.3 when expressed in PPS (meaning that the highest minimum wage was 3.3 times as high as the lowest one, expressed in PPS). Across the Member States, monthly minimum wages in July 2017 ranged from 491 PPS in Bulgaria to 1 615 PPS in Luxembourg.

A comparison of the ranking of countries by minimum wage expressed in euro terms and in PPS terms shows that the adjustment for price level differences resulted in some countries moving upwards and others downwards within the rankings: for the purpose of this analysis the EU Member States and the non-member countries shown in Figures 1 and 2 have been combined in a common ranking. Estonia fell by five positions in the ranking when the results were expressed in PPS terms, while Ireland and Croatia fell by four places, Greece and Portugal by two places, and Spain, Latvia, Lithuania and Serbia by one place. Conversely, the following countries moved upwards in the rankings after the effects of price level differences had been taken into account: Romania (up five places), Hungary and Turkey (up four places), Germany (up three places), France, Poland, Slovenia, Slovakia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (up one place). Each of the remaining countries occupied the same position in the rankings irrespective of whether their minimum wage was expressed in euro or PPS terms.

Minimum wage levels in relation to median gross earnings

Figure 3 provides information in relation to the share of the national minimum wage in median gross earnings.

National minimum wages expressed in euro terms were taken as of 1 July 2014 and divided by the median gross earnings measured from the Structure of Earnings Survey (SES 2014). In July 2014, the proportion of minimum wages in median earnings across the EU Member States varied from 39 % to 64 %. For the purpose of this analysis, payments for overtime and shift work have been excluded from the calculation of median gross monthly earnings. In the case of Germany, France, Ireland and the United Kingdom, whose minimum wages are set on an hourly basis, the ratio was calculated as a proportion of the median hourly earnings. For the other 18 EU Member states, that have national monthly minimum wages, the ratio was calculated as a proportion of the median monthly earnings.

Proportion of minimum wage earners

The proportion of employees earning the minimum wage can vary considerably across countries. By linking microdata from the two latest four-yearly structure of earnings surveys (SES) with the level of minimum wages in force at the time (October 2010 and 2014), it is possible to derive an estimate of these proportions (as presented in Figure 4). For the sake of comparability, the scope has been restricted to full-time workers aged 21 years and over, working in enterprises with 10 employees and more, excluding public administration, defence and compulsory social security (NACE Rev. 2 Section O). Moreover, monthly earnings calculated from the SES exclude any earnings related to overtime and shift work.

In October 2014, the proportion of employees being paid less than 105 % of the national minimum wage was above 7.0 % in ten of the EU Member States that enforced a minimum wage, namely: Slovenia (19.1 %), Romania (15.7 %), Portugal (13.0 %), Poland (11.7 %), Bulgaria (8.8 %); France (8.4 %), Lithuania (8.1 %), Latvia (7.9 %), Greece (7.7 %) and Croatia (7.1 %). Belgium (0.4 %) recorded the lowest proportion of employees earning less than 105 % of the national minimum wage, while the proportion of employees in the remaining ten Member States earning less than this amount stood between 1.0 % (Spain) and 5.8 % (Luxembourg).

Development of the proportion of minimum wage earners

Between 2010 and 2014, the proportion of employees earning less than 105 % of the national minimum wage increased by more than 2.0 percentage points in Romania (11.7 points), Bulgaria (5.4 points), Poland (3.6 points) and Hungary (2.3 points), while it decreased by more than 2.0 points in Lithuania (-5.6 points) , Ireland (-5.1 points), Luxembourg (-4.1 points), Latvia (-4.0 points), Portugal (-3.8 points), Croatia (-2.6 points) and Slovakia (-2.2 points).

Data sources and availability

Monthly national minimum wages

Minimum wage statistics, published by Eurostat, refer to monthly national minimum wages. Data are published in relation to the minimum wages applied on 1 January and 1 July each year. The basic national minimum wage is fixed at an hourly, weekly or monthly rate, and this minimum wage is enforced by law (the government), often after consultation with social partners, or directly by a national intersectoral agreement. The national minimum wage usually applies to all employees, or at least to a large majority of employees in the country; the information is reported in gross terms. A complete set of country-specific information on national minimum wages is available in an annex as part of the metadata.

For those countries where the national minimum wage is not fixed in gross terms, the net value is grossed up to cover the applicable taxes; this is the case for Montenegro and for Serbia.

For those countries where the national minimum wage is not fixed at a monthly rate (for example, where minimum wages are specified on an hourly or weekly basis) the level of the minimum wage is converted into a monthly rate according to conversion factors supplied by the countries concerned:

Germany: (hourly rate x 39.1 hours x 52 weeks) / 12 months (the value of 39.1 hours relates to mean basic hours per week for full time employees in NACE Rev.2 sections B to S: this value is a result of quarterly earnings survey);

Ireland: (hourly rate x 39 hours x 52 weeks) / 12 months;

France: data for January 1999–July 2005: (hourly rate x 39 hours x 52 weeks) / 12 months; data from January 2005 onwards (hourly rate x 35 hours x 52 weeks) / 12 months;

Malta: (weekly rate x 52 weeks) / 12 months;

United Kingdom: (hourly rate x mean basic paid hours per week for full-time employees in all sectors x 52.18 weeks) / 12 months;

United States: (hourly rate x 40 hours x 52 weeks) / 12 months.

In Serbia, the national minimum wage is determined in net hourly terms. The following conversion is applied: (hourly net rate x 40 hours x 52.2 weeks) / 12 months. This value is then grossed up to cover applicable taxes.

In addition, when the minimum wage is paid for more than 12 months per year (as in Greece, Spain and Portugal, where it is paid for 14 months a year), data have been adjusted to take these payments into account.

Data on national minimum wages are submitted to Eurostat in national currency terms. For the non-euro area countries, minimum wages in national currencies are converted into euro by applying the monthly exchange rate as recorded at the end of the previous month (for example, the rate at the end of June 2017 was used for calculating minimum wages in euro terms as of 1 July 2017).

To remove the effect of differences in price levels between the countries, special conversion rates called purchasing power parities (PPPs) are used. PPPs for household final consumption expenditure in each country are used to convert the monthly minimum wages expressed in euro or national currencies to an artificial common unit called the purchasing power standard (PPS). If PPPs for the latest reference period are not yet available, they are replaced by the PPP of the previous year, and the series are updated once the latest PPPs are available.

Countries not covered by minimum wage statistics

As of 1 July 2017, there was no national minimum wage in Denmark, Italy, Cyprus, Austria, Finland and Sweden; this was also the case in the EFTA countries of Iceland, Norway and Switzerland. In Cyprus, minimum wages are set by the government for specific occupations. In Denmark, Italy, Austria, Finland and Sweden, as well as in Iceland, Norway and Switzerland, minimum wages are laid down by collective agreements for a range of specific sectors.

Median gross monthly earnings

Data on median gross monthly earnings are based on the latest data collected from the structure of earnings survey (SES) in 2014 (this survey is conducted once every four years). Data on median gross monthly earnings refer to all employees (excluding apprentices) working in enterprises with 10 employees or more and which operate in all sectors of the economy except agriculture, forestry and fishing (NACE Rev. 2 section A) and public administration and defence; compulsory social security (NACE Rev. 2 section O). Median earnings is the level of earnings which divides all employees into two equal groups: half earn less than the median and half earn more. Gross monthly earnings refer to the wages and salaries earned by full-time and part-time employees in the reference month (generally October 2014) before any tax and social security contributions are deducted. Wages and salaries include any overtime pay, shift premiums, allowances, bonuses, commission, etc. The gross monthly earnings of part-time employees have been converted into full-time units before being included in the average with the same weight as full time employees. Excluding part-time employees from the calculation of median gross monthly earnings impacts the ratio of minimum wages/median earnings by more than 5 percentage points in the Netherlands (49 % instead of 56 %), in Germany (47 % instead of 53 %) and in the United Kingdom (44 % instead of 49 %).

Average exchange rates for 2014 were used to convert data for non-euro area countries into euro. The country-specific activity coverage for national minimum wages as a proportion of average monthly earnings is available in an annex that forms part of the metadata.

Context

Several of the founding EU Member States have a lengthy tradition of ensuring a national minimum wage for those at the lower-paid end of the workforce. By contrast, a number of Member States, including Germany, Ireland, the United Kingdom and many of the countries that joined the EU in 2004 or later, have only recently introduced minimum wage legislation, while six of the EU-28 Member States had no national minimum wage as of 1 July 2017.

In recent years there has been a pattern of relatively low wage increases (wage moderation) in most European countries, and many groups representing workers have argued that purchasing power and overall standards of living have fallen. Some politicians, worker representatives, pressure groups and commentators promote the idea of a ‘European minimum wage’ or national minimum wages set in all EU Member States.

National minimum wage levels are not necessarily changed every year, nor does the adjustment always result in a minimum wage increase — for example, the level of minimum wages in Greece decreased in 2012 as part of the austerity measures introduced by the government. The National Collective Agreement was suspended in Greece that year and the national minimum wage is now fixed by government decision.
bacchus61 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bacchus61 For This Useful Post:
Old January 11th, 2018, 10:12 PM   #2876
tamsmith
Veteran Member
 
tamsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Coming close to the Slippery Slope.
Posts: 7,800
Thanks: 77,915
Thanked 280,411 Times in 9,078 Posts
tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chupachups View Post
I don't think I am very wrong

"Scotland has voted in favour of the UK staying in the EU by 62% to 38% - with all 32 council areas backing Remain."
My answer was about your question of independence, not Brexit my friend.

Two totally different things
tamsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to tamsmith For This Useful Post:
Old January 11th, 2018, 10:15 PM   #2877
tamsmith
Veteran Member
 
tamsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Coming close to the Slippery Slope.
Posts: 7,800
Thanks: 77,915
Thanked 280,411 Times in 9,078 Posts
tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+tamsmith 1000000+
Default

If someone wants to write 2000 word essay in this tread I think it is about time I go to bed.
tamsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to tamsmith For This Useful Post:
Old January 11th, 2018, 10:15 PM   #2878
chupachups
Vintage Member
 
chupachups's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,056
Thanks: 13,387
Thanked 6,316 Times in 1,013 Posts
chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bacchus61 View Post
No I will not say that the NHS is in the state that it is by the way that it is provided, it is in the way that it is run and the underfunding that has take place over many decades and governments that has lead to this situation.
interesting point here

the NHS being underfunded is partly because of the extra 5M people we have in the country and partly an aging population...NHS doctors and dental surgery issues are largely due to the extra 5M

non-EU immigrants should by definition be tax +ve

if EU immigrants were so beneficial, shouldn't the NHS now be much better funded ?

the arguments on uncontrolled EU migration being beneficial just don't stack up

Quote:
Originally Posted by bacchus61 View Post
I had an employee who voted brexit because she and her partner who have never paid tax etc. were overlooked for council accommodation in favour of a Polish couple who were both working in the UK and paying their due taxes, Who's right?
If she is your employee and has never paid tax, shouldn't you be paying her more ?

I wonder if you are pro-EU, because you can threaten her with being replaced with an EU worker if she complains about low pay ?

Not intending to be personal here, but I didn't want you to think I missed that little faux pas on your part
chupachups is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to chupachups For This Useful Post:
Old January 11th, 2018, 10:19 PM   #2879
chupachups
Vintage Member
 
chupachups's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,056
Thanks: 13,387
Thanked 6,316 Times in 1,013 Posts
chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+chupachups 25000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tamsmith View Post
My answer was about your question of independence, not Brexit my friend.

Two totally different things

now I get it

you are refering to the scottish independence referendum

whereas I was refering to the scottish vote in the EU referendum
chupachups is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to chupachups For This Useful Post:
Old January 11th, 2018, 10:21 PM   #2880
bacchus61
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 51
Thanks: 27
Thanked 237 Times in 51 Posts
bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+bacchus61 1000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chupachups View Post
Why would the food get more expensive ?

Do you actually understand what tariffs are ?

they are not export tariffs, i.e. spanish food doesn't get a spanish export tariff due to it being sent to the UK

they are import tariffs, set by the UK govt if a company imports something against the national interests, we punish them by taxing it as it comes in


so unless the UK govt wants to make EU food more expensive, the price stays the same...actually it may reduce, because instead of buying from the EU only, we would be free to buy on the open market....competition, which the EU does not like
Do you actually understand what tariffs are ? Probably not. My understanding is:
a tax or duty to be paid on a particular class of imports or exports.
If we leave the EU then this means that we will be liable to levies placed on goods and services. If we buy goods from EU member states without prior trade negotiations then we could face increased prices
With the reduction in the pound, wherever we buy imports from will cost more
bacchus61 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to bacchus61 For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 01:24 AM.






vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.1 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.