Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum
Home
Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Discussion & Talk Forum > Vintage Erotica
Best Porn Sites Live Sex Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices
Vintage Erotica Maximum date of the content allowed to be posted here is 1995.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old September 25th, 2010, 07:33 AM   #971
JGW
Vintage Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,038
Thanks: 2,845
Thanked 25,652 Times in 1,013 Posts
JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+
Default

This is an enhanced version of a picture of Anne Scott that appeared earlier in this forum. Anne wears a smart suit but gives us a generous upskirt view and a glimpse of her brassiere.

JGW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 25th, 2010, 09:05 AM   #972
JGW
Vintage Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,038
Thanks: 2,845
Thanked 25,652 Times in 1,013 Posts
JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+
Default

Bathtime - fully clothed, shoes and all.
And the lady is clearly enjoying it.


JGW is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to JGW For This Useful Post:
Old September 25th, 2010, 09:45 AM   #973
Knickers1
Vintage Member
 
Knickers1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 6,268
Thanked 60,408 Times in 2,314 Posts
Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+
Default

The pic of Jane Paul, posted by brewsterrobin is rather interesting. If one looks very carefully, it appears she is without pants. If so, it would certainly fit well into the definition of pornography, in the era it was taken. I wonder if any of the S&S regulars ever did more revealing work that has never seen the light of day? Just imagine, Nicola and Marie, full frontal ! Nick

Last edited by Knickers1; September 25th, 2010 at 09:47 AM.. Reason: Missing text
Knickers1 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Knickers1 For This Useful Post:
Old September 25th, 2010, 10:04 AM   #974
JGW
Vintage Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,038
Thanks: 2,845
Thanked 25,652 Times in 1,013 Posts
JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knickers1 View Post
The pic of Jane Paul, posted by brewsterrobin is rather interesting. If one looks very carefully, it appears she is without pants. If so, it would certainly fit well into the definition of pornography, in the era it was taken. I wonder if any of the S&S regulars ever did more revealing work that has never seen the light of day? Just imagine, Nicola and Marie, full frontal ! Nick
Ah yes this is full frontal nudity in the days before Playboy printed their first one in 1970. Thereafter it was six more years until the really explicit pictures appeared - not in S&S magazines of course, a factor which was part of their charm and their decline simultaneously.
JGW is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to JGW For This Useful Post:
Old September 25th, 2010, 11:33 AM   #975
Knickers1
Vintage Member
 
Knickers1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 6,268
Thanked 60,408 Times in 2,314 Posts
Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+
Default

I recently found these pics of Marie which I'd almost forgotten about....she just looks ever so sweet. She did quite a bit of topless work for Ken, however, she was never topless when featured with another girl. Of all Ken's models, I feel it would have been Marie who would have been willing to reveal all. Nick

Knickers1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 25th, 2010, 01:16 PM   #976
Knickers1
Vintage Member
 
Knickers1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 6,268
Thanked 60,408 Times in 2,314 Posts
Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+
Default

Regarding the subject of onlookers, this set of the lovely Millicent Dawson is rather interesting. In two of the pics it's obvious that there are people around and, in one pic in particular, they are very close by. The location is Hampstead Heath. What is also very interesting is that Millicent ends up without her skirt so any onlookers would have had full view of her stocking tops and pants. What an unexpected treat ! Nick

Knickers1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 25th, 2010, 03:21 PM   #977
Medium2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 367
Thanks: 1,767
Thanked 3,617 Times in 338 Posts
Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+Medium2 10000+
Default

On the subject of where the photographers found the girls, the beauty competition (whatever happened to them?) scenario rings a bell. Also, of course, the mags did carry norices in every issue that they were looking for models. No doubt various wives and girlfriends appeared as well.

I would say that (judging by the frequent views of his fireplace!) Ken H was pretty prolific and was the main freelance supplier in the 1970's, equalling the Scottish photographers of the 60's.
Medium2 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Medium2 For This Useful Post:
Old September 25th, 2010, 09:22 PM   #978
JGW
Vintage Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,038
Thanks: 2,845
Thanked 25,652 Times in 1,013 Posts
JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Knickers1 View Post
Regarding the subject of onlookers, this set of the lovely Millicent Dawson is rather interesting.
I was doing some glamour photography once. A nearby builder alerted his mates and I had three of them - in a row - 'hiding' in a hedge. If one plans to do that, it's best not to wear a bright yellow 'Day-glo' jacket!

Last edited by JGW; September 25th, 2010 at 09:38 PM..
JGW is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to JGW For This Useful Post:
Old September 26th, 2010, 09:56 AM   #979
JGW
Vintage Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,038
Thanks: 2,845
Thanked 25,652 Times in 1,013 Posts
JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+JGW 100000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewsterrobin View Post
Incidentally, for me, the 60s was when S&S were at their absolute tops. As has been mentioned earlier, once the full-frontal watershed was breached at the beginning of the 70s and the Paul Raymonds and David Sullivans ushered in the "top shelf", S&S's days were sadly numbered. Ironically, Sullivan's top girl, Mary Millington, appeared of course in a couple of late Spicks and Spans under her real name Mary Maxted.
Nothing is mentioned of Sammy Bond who did great upskirt photos in magazines like 'Mustang'. With regard to model participation I guess KH can tell loads and that the 'beauty pageant' circuit on the South Coast might have a lot to do with it. And, again, I say this is all joyous sexy and innocent stuff despite minimal bondage pics. And I thank all the models for the capers. And we still want to hear from them. After all the ravishing Teresa May has responded to her forum thread.

Last edited by JGW; September 26th, 2010 at 05:27 PM..
JGW is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to JGW For This Useful Post:
Old September 26th, 2010, 05:51 PM   #980
Knickers1
Vintage Member
 
Knickers1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 2,325
Thanks: 6,268
Thanked 60,408 Times in 2,314 Posts
Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+Knickers1 250000+
Default

For me, the golden age of Spick and Span was the Ken Howard era. All my favourite girls were photographed by him; Nicola, Marie, Laura, Ingrid, Lowra etc. So, I suppose, essentially for me the great years were from about 1968 till the end of publication in 1976. I would also like to add that repeats of earlier work (mainly by Scotllee) were regularly featured in the latter publications and, therefore, created a perfect blend of girls in pre mini skirt and post mini skirt fashion and styles. The best of both worlds, one might say and, something I enjoyed to the full. Nick

Last edited by Knickers1; September 27th, 2010 at 06:19 AM.. Reason: Missing text
Knickers1 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Knickers1 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:28 PM.






vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.1 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.