|
Best Porn Sites | Live Sex | Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar |
Classic Pornstars Hardcore (magazine) models and adult film performers that started their career in 1995 or before. |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
February 28th, 2017, 10:29 PM | #581 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2
Thanks: 1,167
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to MadFax For This Useful Post: |
March 1st, 2017, 06:46 PM | #582 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: North America
Posts: 1,293
Thanks: 1,758
Thanked 53,799 Times in 1,282 Posts
|
I just posted this same scene that got posted again today not that long ago in the same thread.
http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...postcount=1542 http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...postcount=1512 |
March 7th, 2017, 06:31 PM | #583 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: North America
Posts: 1,293
Thanks: 1,758
Thanked 53,799 Times in 1,282 Posts
|
Wrong section of the forum. Madison Ivy started her career well after 1996. By the way is that rule going to change to 1997 now that a new year has started?
http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...postcount=1551 Last edited by keefriff; March 7th, 2017 at 10:40 PM.. Reason: Post removed. No change in date. Always will stay 1996 |
March 9th, 2017, 08:11 AM | #584 |
Vintage Idiot
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: History
Posts: 22,143
Thanks: 226,791
Thanked 357,041 Times in 21,638 Posts
|
Suggestion to move Miriem thread to modern? Her pics. from Penthouse (i.e. the thread's entire content) were published in 1999-06
Edit: We don't know when she started her career, but suggestion passed to Modern Mods |
March 9th, 2017, 11:13 AM | #585 |
Vintage Idiot
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: History
Posts: 22,143
Thanks: 226,791
Thanked 357,041 Times in 21,638 Posts
|
That's true, and has been mentioned to me in this same/parallel context previously. I guess the question I'm asking you is: is your default position one of assumption, or one based on (currently avaialble) evidence? Do you start with the assumption that everyone could have started in the classic era until and unless proven otherwise--whether by d.o.b. info. or implausibility, or whatever? Or do you instead start from the position of: what evidence do we currently have?
If tomorrow evidence was found that Miriem had worked pre-1996 then fine, move her back to classic, but until then available evidence suggests modern, & by a distance of ~3-4 years. That would be an evidence-based approach to the problem, and the outcomes are pretty straightforward for all to see and understand. Are the outcomes equally as straightforward and understandable for all if the approach is instead based on presumption? No, I'm not trying to make things difficult for mods. or to embarrass anyone, I'm just surfacing/explaining what seems like the logical basis of the question posed by the classic/modern boundary. There are plenty of examples, some shown in this very thread, of people who mistakenly start duplicate threads for models/performers only in the wrong place (classic for modern or modern for classic). That would seem like clear/unarguable evidence that members are not inherently reliable as regards considering whether a model/performer is rightly classic/modern: many don't seem to give that much thought at all. So if we don't accept that for "second-comers" why still assume it for first-comers, when the (currently available) evidence shows otherwise? |
March 9th, 2017, 12:48 PM | #586 | |
Former Staff
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 16,579
Thanks: 452,836
Thanked 222,661 Times in 16,567 Posts
|
Quote:
In this case, the thread was moved to Classic Pornstars by the then head of Model ID Requests, so my assumptions must be: a) she's been investigated by our best sleuths, b) she did porn, and c) she's classic. That's more than enough for me However, if you're saying the evidence says otherwise and she's modern, I can ask the Modern Mods what they think, which is what I've done. But I can't move the thread myself because it's their call |
|
March 12th, 2017, 09:01 AM | #587 |
Eternal Hibernation
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Malmö,Sweden
Posts: 6,831
Thanks: 108,938
Thanked 163,070 Times in 7,323 Posts
|
Gina Rome
D/l down in this post: http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...09&postcount=2 Thanks Edit: Thanks! OP contacted and re-up requested |
March 12th, 2017, 08:25 PM | #588 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 2
Thanks: 4
Thanked 9 Times in 2 Posts
|
Paola Senatore dead link:
http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...&postcount=112 http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...&postcount=113 Edit: Thanks! OP contacted and re-up requested |
March 14th, 2017, 01:31 PM | #589 | |
Long Suffering Bills Fan
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: The City of Good Neighbors
Posts: 9,669
Thanks: 304,243
Thanked 153,135 Times in 9,629 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
March 16th, 2017, 12:23 PM | #590 |
Vintage Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere on earth
Posts: 1,355
Thanks: 5,786
Thanked 20,361 Times in 1,287 Posts
|
Buttman's Big Butt Backdoor Babes (2000) (Shanna McCullough)
Rapidgator link to this thread is dead:
http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...&postcount=201 EDIT March 18, 2017: Link has been updated and is working now.
__________________
RafaelS Here you can find To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. . Don't hesitate to PM me if you have problems with my download links. Please do not repost my links To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Last edited by RafaelS; March 18th, 2017 at 05:25 PM.. Reason: EDIT |
|
|