Anna Richardson

bug45 · August 12th, 2015, 07:57 PM

says in todays papers she posted some nude pics of herself to a revenge porn site to see what it would be like for the victims

ukbadge · August 17th, 2015, 07:07 AM

Doubt if they exist. We would have seen them by now.

**pharoahegypt** · August 17th, 2015, 03:31 PM

if they are out there, someone will put two and two together soon enough, and post them on a site. and when they do they'll end up here soon enough.....

**seany65** · August 17th, 2015, 10:00 PM

So how can She see what it's like for the victims, if She posted them with Her full knowledge and approval, when victims don't know it's going to be done and don't approve when they do find out, and prolly don't have their faces blanked out?

Complete crap if you ask me.

CaptainYfronts · August 17th, 2015, 10:12 PM

Pics are supposedly uploaded to an unidentified site.

Pictures are doctored to make the subject unidentifiable in these pics.

Subject is unidentifiable and therefore hardly representative of the "revenge porn" issue making her involvement utterly pointless.

Load of old bollocks if you ask me.

**pharoahegypt** · August 17th, 2015, 11:07 PM

.and having just watched the programme.... they were removed in any case... so unless someone who knew she was doing this; related to the show perhaps; we're likely never going to see them now. shame. but probably the best outcome considering the nature of the reason behind her doing it. i'd sure not like pix of my ugly face and wrinkly knob all over the web for people to laugh at.......

August 12th, 2015, 07:57 PM	#1
bug45 Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Posts: 6 Thanks: 1 Thanked 27 Times in 3 Posts	Anna Richardson says in todays papers she posted some nude pics of herself to a revenge porn site to see what it would be like for the victims

August 17th, 2015, 03:31 PM	#3
pharoahegypt Vintage Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Middle England Posts: 4,491 Thanks: 10,176 Thanked 43,617 Times in 4,154 Posts	if they are out there, someone will put two and two together soon enough, and post them on a site. and when they do they'll end up here soon enough..... __________________ Arguing with a intelligent person is hard; but arguing with a stupid person is impossible!

August 17th, 2015, 10:00 PM	#4
seany65 Vintage Member Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 3,651 Thanks: 80,415 Thanked 32,730 Times in 3,527 Posts	So how can She see what it's like for the victims, if She posted them with Her full knowledge and approval, when victims don't know it's going to be done and don't approve when they do find out, and prolly don't have their faces blanked out? Complete crap if you ask me. __________________ <-- That's Emer Kenny and I want to be stuck in her front bottom. Quote from electrofreak : I'd rather have questions that can't be answered, than answers that can't be questioned.

August 17th, 2015, 11:07 PM	#6
pharoahegypt Vintage Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Middle England Posts: 4,491 Thanks: 10,176 Thanked 43,617 Times in 4,154 Posts	.and having just watched the programme.... they were removed in any case... so unless someone who knew she was doing this; related to the show perhaps; we're likely never going to see them now. shame. but probably the best outcome considering the nature of the reason behind her doing it. i'd sure not like pix of my ugly face and wrinkly knob all over the web for people to laugh at....... __________________ Arguing with a intelligent person is hard; but arguing with a stupid person is impossible!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

August 17th, 2015, 07:07 AM	#2
ukbadge Junior Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 6 Thanks: 3 Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts	Doubt if they exist. We would have seen them by now.

August 17th, 2015, 10:12 PM	#5
CaptainYfronts Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 50 Thanks: 244 Thanked 774 Times in 48 Posts	Pics are supposedly uploaded to an unidentified site. Pictures are doctored to make the subject unidentifiable in these pics. Subject is unidentifiable and therefore hardly representative of the "revenge porn" issue making her involvement utterly pointless. Load of old bollocks if you ask me.