Conspiracies

[Meini Again]

David Cameron { UK Prime Minister} is an intelectual Giant, in Economics, Diplomacy and Sex.
This is apparent by the media in the UK playing down these attributes ~~ before they unleash and ungirth his loins of power, pre-2016 referendums/local elections~~~ then he'll be a wimp again....

Or is it real ??

[seany65]

Originally Posted by DTravel

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7_Worl...1_and_collapse

1) Building 7 was hit by debris as the North Tower collapsed.
2) It did not come down exactly like the twin towers.

Building 7 collapsed because of out of control fires on multiple floors.

And yet, NO other building (apart from the two towers, apparently) has ever collapsed, especially on it's own footprint, due entirely to fire. If you look a the footage of how 'severe' the fires were in building 7, then you'll see flames that are far less severe than they have been in many other buildings which didn't come down due to fires.

[scoundrel]

Originally Posted by seany65

And yet, NO other building (apart from the two towers, apparently) has ever collapsed, especially on it's own footprint, due entirely to fire. If you look a the footage of how 'severe' the fires were in building 7, then you'll see flames that are far less severe than they have been in many other buildings which didn't come down due to fires.

I think that you will find that severe impact damage was also a factor.

WTC7 was hit by debris falling from the North Tower and the photograph shows it was heavily compromised by the impact.

[haldane4]

Originally Posted by stardust2003

What is it about Texas ? it seems to be the conspiracy capital
of the USA ..

Alex Jones lives there in Austin.... Tex Marrs... Jim Marrs

The Kennedy assassination .... happened in Texas
maybe the biggest conspiracy story of all time.

A lot of conspiracy type radio seems to originate in Texas too...

Is there something in the water ?

And you'd be amazed to find how many famous, or soon to be famous, people were in Dallas on November 22 1963. Even Tommy Lee Jones was there.

[seany65]

Originally Posted by scoundrel

I think that you will find that severe impact damage was also a factor.

WTC7 was hit by debris falling from the North Tower and the photograph shows it was heavily compromised by the impact.

Alright, so I've not seen that photo before, but that doesn't explain why building 7 came down in what looks like a 'controlled demolition'. Surely if it were to collapse because of that damage, it would've at least toppled in that corner a little bit, rather than collapsing in the middle first and falling evenly on it's own footprint?

[rotobott]

If only the Feds had worked out how to demolish a building sideways

[CARLTON BROWN]

To my way of thinking, it is most unlikely that any US agency had a direct involvement with the attacks that took place on 911.

Where there might be an overall conspiracy, is the possibility that it was known to those in power that these attacks were coming and they were allowed to happen. There is some evidence to support prior knowledge and this event directed America onto a darker path and put immense power in the hands of a relatively small group of individuals.

The second possible conspiracy involves Flight 93 and a good deal of circumstantial evidence suggests it was actually shot down by an Air National Guard F-16 as it headed towards the White House. If this was the case and it had been disclosed, the fall-out would have been very difficult to deal with by the administration.

[DTravel]

Originally Posted by CARLTON BROWN

To my way of thinking, it is most unlikely that any US agency had a direct involvement with the attacks that took place on 911.

Where there might be an overall conspiracy, is the possibility that it was known to those in power that these attacks were coming and they were allowed to happen. There is some evidence to support prior knowledge and this event directed America onto a darker path and put immense power in the hands of a relatively small group of individuals.

I think you are crediting such a conspiracy with way too much capability but I don't feel like getting into this one again.

The second possible conspiracy involves Flight 93 and a good deal of circumstantial evidence suggests it was actually shot down by an Air National Guard F-16 as it headed towards the White House. If this was the case and it had been disclosed, the fall-out would have been very difficult to deal with by the administration.

If that were the case there wouldn't BE any cockpit sound recordings to play for the passengers' families. While most family members understandably haven't spoken publicly about what they heard, enough have to clearly indicate that those recordings collaborate that United 93 was brought down by the hijackers as they were losing control of the cockpit to the passengers' attack. Nothing to indicate the aircraft was shot down.

(Never mind that since it came down in Pennsylvania it was way too far from DC for anyone to know what building it may have been intended to target.)

[DTravel]

Originally Posted by rotobott

If only the Feds had worked out how to demolish a building sideways

First, you build a REALLY, REALLY big bulldozer....

[knobby109]

Originally Posted by CARLTON BROWN

To my way of thinking, it is most unlikely that any US agency had a direct involvement with the attacks that took place on 911.

Where there might be an overall conspiracy, is the possibility that it was known to those in power that these attacks were coming and they were allowed to happen. There is some evidence to support prior knowledge and this event directed America onto a darker path and put immense power in the hands of a relatively small group of individuals.

The second possible conspiracy involves Flight 93 and a good deal of circumstantial evidence suggests it was actually shot down by an Air National Guard F-16 as it headed towards the White House. If this was the case and it had been disclosed, the fall-out would have been very difficult to deal with by the administration.

I cannot imagine any agency member, sworn to protect the USA , would have stood aside and allowed 911 to happen.But it wouldn't have been just one person but quite a group of them thus rendering it totally unfeasible that none of them would have acted.