The new "tolerant" extreme left

[diamelsx]

Originally Posted by savage560

You can't recall the TT attack in 1995? They were there , just not that grand of a scale. Now that the little idiot Bush let so many in & invaded that region we can see why the attacks have increased.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontl.../etc/cron.html

http://www.history.com/news/remember...center-bombing

95' Attacks? You talking the Satin? If so that was not islamic. The (93' WTC happened after the first gulf war and those attacks in the 80s was while we were over there militarily.

[diamelsx]

Originally Posted by savage560

The perps still were of the Muhammadan sects!

Not true.

Aum Shinrikyo/Aleph is a syncretic belief system that drew upon Asahara's idiosyncratic interpretations of elements of early Indian Buddhism and Tibetan Buddhism along with Hinduism, taking Shiva as main image of worship and incorporating millennialist ideas from the Christian Book of Revelation, Yoga and the writings of Nostradamus.[9][10] Its founder, Chizuo Matsumoto, claimed that he sought to restore "original Buddhism".[11] In 1992 Matsumoto, who changed his name to Shoko Asahara, published a foundational book, and declared himself "Christ",[12] Japan's only fully enlightened master and identified with the "Lamb of God".[13]

His purported mission was to take upon himself the sins of the world, and he claimed he could transfer to his followers spiritual power and ultimately take away their sins and bad deeds.[14] While many discount Aum Shinrikyo's claims of Buddhist characteristics and affiliation to Buddhism, scholars often refer to it as an offshoot of Japanese Buddhism,[15] and this was how the movement generally defined and saw itself.[16]

Asahara outlined a doomsday prophecy, which included a World War III instigated by the United States.[17] Robert Jay Lifton, an American psychiatrist and author, says that Asahara "described a final conflict culminating in a nuclear "Armageddon", borrowing the term from the Book of Revelation 16:16".[18] Humanity would end, except for the elite few who joined Aum.[18] Aum's mission was not only to spread the word of "salvation", but also to survive these "End Times". Asahara predicted Armageddon would occur in 1997.[18] Kaplan also notes that in Shoko Asahara's lectures he referred to the United States as "The Beast" from the Book of Revelation, predicting that it would eventually attack Japan.[18] Arthur Goldwag, author of a book on conspiracies and secret societies, characterizes Asahara as one who "saw dark conspiracies everywhere promulgated by Jews, Freemasons, the Dutch, the British royal family, and rival Japanese religions".[19]

In the opinion of Daniel A. Metraux, Aum Shinrikyo justified its violence through its own unique interpretation of Buddhist ideas and doctrines, such as the Buddhist concepts of Mappō and Shōhō—Aum claimed that by bringing about the end of the world, they would restore Shōhō.[20] Furthermore, Lifton believes, Asahara "interpreted the Tibetan Buddhist concept of poa in order to claim that by killing someone contrary to the group's aims, they were preventing them from accumulating bad karma and thus saving them".[21]

The name "Aum Shinrikyo" (オウム真理教 Oumu Shinrikyō), usually rendered in English as "Supreme Truth", derives from the Sanskrit syllable Aum, used to represent the universe, followed by the Japanese Shinrikyo (meaning, roughly, "Teaching of Truth") written in kanji (in Japanese, kanji are used to write originally Japanese as well as Sino-xenic words, and not usually to transcribe those borrowed directly from exotic foreign languages). In 2000, the organization changed its name to "Aleph"—a reference to the first letter of the Phoenician, Hebrew and Arabic alphabets—and replaced its logo.

source

[sean612]

Originally Posted by savage560

Seems like they are very left nowadays , but I cannot see much tolerance to any ideas but their own? Hmmmm?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xXb66Stixk

we are tolerant,we won't tolerate hate and be called hateful,because we hate the hate of hate.The false flag and your jingoism doesn't change the fact that sometimes to stare down hate ,we need to show anger

[badman999]

Originally Posted by sean612

we are tolerant,we won't tolerate hate and be called hateful,because we hate the hate of hate.The false flag and your jingoism doesn't change the fact that sometimes to stare down hate ,we need to show anger

HA. HAHA. HAHAHAHAH.

The modern leftists define the word "hate" as, "anything that challenges their narrow, brainwashed worldview". Then the snowflakes all riot before retreating to their safe spaces and snuggling their kittens and blowing bubbles. There is no real attempt at discourse, defining workable solutions or any attempt to understand cause and effect of what are some challenging issues facing the world today. Just intolerance, bullying and intellectual bankruptcy.

[diamelsx]

Originally Posted by savage560

What are you stating, if you attack a Muslim anywhere you attack a Muslim everywhere? Even if it helps millions more "peaceful" Muhammadans, that are getting killed by the nutjob, inbread 40% or so? I don't get it & never will! So don't even try to explain!

Alright let's say you have 3 brothers and you find out I killed all of them and set it up that my friends end up marrying the widows and taking care of the kids. Also a chunk of your brothers' assets get funneled to me for hooking these guys up would you be wrong in wanting to take me out?

Originally Posted by savage560

Yes , I'm for the Jesse Ventura philosophy on this: Leave those bastards alone, & get the hell out of their putrid little hell holes & tell Western citizens if you go there, "watch your head"! You're on your own. & keep them out of here & put up this sign.

"America is FULL , no vacancies!"

Just like 70% of us say here!

Too late for the sign, you set fire to there house already. You already bought it, now pay for it

[diamelsx]

Originally Posted by savage560

"Yes we can", change our policies in the ME , to coin a president, who started out fairly good then ended up ,in all reality , loosing the next election for his party, due to his policies .This due to his far left or better put far out wacko policies, that he instituted late in his term, that were of little or no benefit to our majority, the average MC tax paying citizens here.This in regards to policies regarding national security , immigration of all types & its consequences, protection of our borders , & allowing travel from hotbeds of terrorist laden nations, to arrive to our nation.Remember , in our constitution we as a nation are not obliged to take in ANY refugees. & yes we can reverse the ME policy. When the house is on fire, you don't watch it burn,like you say ,WE PUT IT OUT!

It was not the center that stayed home last election and other elections since 2010. It was the left sick of the party not listening to them. They said they did not want Hillary and the party thought they would come around and did not realize how real with it they were the next president will be to the left of Obama, if not Trump may get another term.

Originally Posted by savage560

Under the current crop of wackos of the new DemocRat party, we are more concerned with a sliver of our populace, than the ones who count most, the average citizenry of tax payers, who have spoken in the last presidential election & don't want the #1 priority of this nation to be for small slivers of the "special interests" of the very few. What do I mean, & not limited too? This Congress of Democrats in particular, is obsessed with ridiculous things like transgender restrooms , everywhere & anywhere. Just use that shitter the way you were born to use it, GD it!

If when you say "sliver" you mean "donor$" I will agree with you.

Originally Posted by savage560

Is that why ~30% of our prisons are comprise of them.

Actually the are there to get your tax dollars. You take someone ineligible for assistance and make it that the state ends up providing housing, food, clothing, and medical. And here you are crying about welfare.
Vid#1
Vid#2

Originally Posted by savage560

You factor out the 12-13% of our racial group that are committing over 50% of our crime here & exclude Hispanics of any race factored into the crime states for whites, its just another very uncomfortable fact of life that make ultra liberal fact deniers cringe , & look & see how they can fudge the facts! Its not nice to say things that are uncomfortably true , but it is a way to find ways to make these truths known so we can find ways to correct them.

My solution I believe would kill two birds with one stone. I say put an end to this drug war. Doing so would lower the crime rates in the poorer and middle-class communities over here and also weaken the criminal organizations south of the border, thus lowering the murder rate making it safer and lowering the need to immigrate without documentation.

Originally Posted by savage560

Hopefully this Congress can stop what most first world nations have , including Canada. BR citizenship given to children born here by illegal aliens should no longer be the law.

put an end to an at least a 173 year legal pecedent that was solidified with a constitutional Ammendment, good luck with that...

[Roubignol]

Hey Savage... How do you spend your freetime when you are not working?

[diamelsx]

Originally Posted by savage560

Again to you, who will NEVER acknowledge the facts & live in fear of illegal aliens....

Fear Them? Why I fear them about as much as I fear anybody else I see their plight and understand them being maligned is just the NWO plot to exploit the beliefs of suckers like you thinking they are over here to take over and breed you out of existance. It is funny how every other group wants to just come over and rule and turn the women into baby factories so they can churn out mixed raced hybrids. GTFOH with that it that mentality that is going to have to die.

BTW with as many as 300,000 - 400,000 illegals,or tourists, , are giving birth to children in this nation,per year!

WoW you make that sound like a lot. Land of 300,000,000+ and you talking about 400,000 hey maybe we should supply them with Clomid so they can get those numbers up.

Originally Posted by savage560

We had better do something quickly about the illegal invasion & or tourist birthing here in this nation! When they become citizens it becomes much more of a drain on our tax payer too!

No more of a drain than rounding them up and incarcerating them, unless you own the jail they are going to.

Originally Posted by savage560

A Constitutional Amendment, many say is not needed, but a ruling by the USSC , that will clarify that this type of birth, does not constitute citizenship.

The people who said this, we're they asking for money at the Time? How would "That type of birth" not apply to birthright Citizenship? Looking at the case history the court would have to turn itself into a pretzel to justify the outcome you want.

Originally Posted by savage560

It was done in Canada & only a hopeless person, who throws in the towel & says it never can be done here, gives up so early! Maybe a self hating, self destructing "tolerant liberal" too? Like remember, when you see your house burning , don't just say let it burn, put the GD fire out!

You say I am being hopeless, I say you are being conned. I guess time will tell who is right.

Originally Posted by savage560

IMHO there are too many like you in the west, hopeless , hapless & living in fear , volunteering to blindly succumb to the whims of the NWO oligarchy . I'm glad I won't be around to see what America becomes, especially when we have so many who advocate by fear or extreme liberalism, the destruction of their culture, language ,identity, & borders. When they realize its too late is when they will try to fight. But by then it may be too late?

You see dread I understand the opportunity. So the fear you have is not really shared.

[martynz]

In your last but one post savage560.Keywords for recognizing your innate racism.

[diamelsx]

Originally Posted by savage560

A Constitutional Amendment, many say is not needed, but a ruling by the USSC , that will clarify that this type of birth, does not constitute citizenship.

The 14th amendment Section 1 of the Constitution states

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.

From my reading in order for the Supreme Court to disenfranchise the children of undocumented parents who are born here you would have to somehow argue that they are not people otherwise it is as clear as it can be.