Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum
Home
Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Discussion & Talk Forum > Vintage Erotica > Vintage Erotica Talk
Best Porn Sites Live Sex Register FAQ Members List Calendar

Notices
Vintage Erotica Talk Talk about vintage erotica right here!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old October 12th, 2018, 10:07 PM   #41
cqnew1648
Senior Member
 
cqnew1648's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 214
Thanks: 5,880
Thanked 12,514 Times in 214 Posts
cqnew1648 50000+cqnew1648 50000+cqnew1648 50000+cqnew1648 50000+cqnew1648 50000+cqnew1648 50000+cqnew1648 50000+cqnew1648 50000+cqnew1648 50000+cqnew1648 50000+cqnew1648 50000+
Default Patti Farinelli

Thanks, Ruderberry, for your nod to my post. I loved your comment about Patti Farinelli—that her breasts are so big “she almost looked helpless.” Patti does look overwhelmed in the pictures in which she let her breasts slump. How could she not pitch forward?



Patti’s chest, as we can see from the photos below, was small. She is a very petite person. Her 36” measurement was all about her breasts.



Sadly, Patti’s breasts were so large in proportion to her body that she was indeed helpless. As her fans know, her breasts caused her such back pain that she had to have reduction surgery. She was every bit as beautiful afterwards, as she showed in her photos at Glamourcon. But I’m sorry she had to live with such pain. Being spectacularly beautiful had a wonderful upside for Patti, as she said in many interviews; but it had its downside too.
cqnew1648 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 13th, 2018, 12:18 PM   #42
ruderberry
Vintage Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 622
Thanks: 839
Thanked 10,835 Times in 618 Posts
ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+ruderberry 50000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cqnew1648 View Post
Thanks, Ruderberry, for your nod to my post. I loved your comment about Patti Farinelli—that her breasts are so big “she almost looked helpless.” Patti does look overwhelmed in the pictures in which she let her breasts slump. How could she not pitch forward?



Patti’s chest, as we can see from the photos below, was small. She is a very petite person. Her 36” measurement was all about her breasts.



Sadly, Patti’s breasts were so large in proportion to her body that she was indeed helpless. As her fans know, her breasts caused her such back pain that she had to have reduction surgery. She was every bit as beautiful afterwards, as she showed in her photos at Glamourcon. But I’m sorry she had to live with such pain. Being spectacularly beautiful had a wonderful upside for Patti, as she said in many interviews; but it had its downside too.
Thanks for another informative post, cqnew! The second-last shot, of Patti's back view, illustrates how slender and petite she was. So those massive breasts must have put considerable strain on her little frame, resulting in the back pain you mention and the "helpless" look referred to previously.

In fact, the late and rapid development of her bust might well have been a shock to her whole system. She told Playboy that, up to the age of 16-17, she had no breasts to speak of, earning her the nickname "Flatty Patti" from unkind schoolmates. Four years later she's a Playmate displaying a massive pair of bazookas....

I read somewhere she wasn't thrilled about some aspects of the centerfold shoot.
1) It was set in a library, but she was an outdoor kind of girl.
2) There was too much concentration on her breasts.
3) She had to wear her hair up, which wasn't her preferred style.

BTW, when did she undergo breast reduction surgery? I think she also had facial rejuvenation work done.
ruderberry is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to ruderberry For This Useful Post:
Old September 26th, 2022, 01:10 AM   #43
carno26
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Posts: 24
Thanks: 68
Thanked 94 Times in 16 Posts
carno26 100+carno26 100+carno26 100+carno26 100+carno26 100+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fordprefect739 View Post
Patricia Farinelli, December 1980, would be a contender, if not the winner.

I'm pretty sure Julianna Young had/has implants. Her nips point way off to the side.
Patty’s one my favs
carno26 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to carno26 For This Useful Post:
Old September 26th, 2022, 09:12 PM   #44
MattHelm85
Vintage Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Posts: 1,082
Thanks: 9,232
Thanked 13,404 Times in 926 Posts
MattHelm85 50000+MattHelm85 50000+MattHelm85 50000+MattHelm85 50000+MattHelm85 50000+MattHelm85 50000+MattHelm85 50000+MattHelm85 50000+MattHelm85 50000+MattHelm85 50000+MattHelm85 50000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cqnew1648 View Post
I’m glad so many VEF members weighed in on this subject, because it’s a chance to speak about nearly all of my favorite PMs. I tried to answer the question in a post on another thread by setting up a competition among my three favorite PMs, but I thought I might share a thought here as well. Size is not a simple matter, even for fashion designers. Voluptuous women measure differently, depending on whether they flex or relax their chest muscles, and whether they stand or bend over. Women with strong chest muscles can rein in their breasts by flexing, and can drop their breasts farther when they relax, because strong muscles tend to be more elastic and stretch farther (see Olympic athletes). So the breasts of strong women may appear to be smaller or larger depending on their pose. And compared to women with dense breasts, women with softer, suppler breasts can drop their breasts farther when they bend over. That's why fashion designers ask voluptuous women to relax and to measure themselves both standing and bending over, so the larger measurement can be used.

It’s possible, of course, that PB simply published the measurements that PMs gave them, but if not, PMs were probably standing when PB measured them. I imagine PMs probably raised themselves at that moment to their full heights, tensed themselves, threw their shoulders back, took deep breaths and held them to expand their chests, and tightened their abs, so they would appear as curvaceous as possible to a tape measure. But that method would have disadvantaged certain PMs, especially petite PMs who were already disadvantaged in the measurement game because their chests were smaller, even though their breasts were not.

Karen Price is a wonderful case in point. She is petite, but perhaps the strongest, most athletic PM of all time, so she can project her breasts quite nicely when she arches her back and flexes her chest.


A great description and analysis of the size of their breasts. Each one is amazing in her own right. Some rounder, some more of the vintage "torpedo" and some have varying areolas. in any case, all are stunning on your list.
MattHelm85 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to MattHelm85 For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:53 PM.






vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.1 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.