Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum

Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Discussion & Talk Forum > General Discussion & News

Follow Vintage Erotica Forum on Twitter
Best Porn Sites Meet Our Girls Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices
General Discussion & News Want to speak your mind about something ... do it here.


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-14-2018, 08:17 AM   #11
effCup
Vintage Idiot
 
effCup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: History
Posts: 15,823
Thanks: 176,576
Thanked 192,586 Times in 15,681 Posts
effCup 750000+effCup 750000+effCup 750000+effCup 750000+effCup 750000+effCup 750000+effCup 750000+effCup 750000+effCup 750000+effCup 750000+effCup 750000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian249x View Post
Somewhat less than the number who had used animals for sex.
So, just check to whether I've followed your info.: you're saying that more men reported having sex with animals than women reported trading sex for money? Yet it was the latter you said was (to men, anyhow) shockingly high. Is that because men aren't as shocked by the behaviour of other men as they are by the behaviour of women?

Yes, OK, the number of men who trade money for sex probably doesn't relate exactly/linearly to the number of women trading sex for money, but there will still be an approx. ratio/similarity.
effCup is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to effCup For This Useful Post: