Charlotte Gainsbourg - Do I Really Believe My Eyes?

[delicasalat]

Originally Posted by Mr Bond

..... not a lookalike, but Charlotte pussy !
As you see, a pic with no blood, as we can see here or here ...

Sorry, but no cigar. This ain't Charlotte's. A porn double (Elvira Friis) and prosthetic genitals were used in the movie.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_4995662.html

[delicasalat]

Originally Posted by pharoahegypt

judging merely on her past movies; i reckon she's just about as likely to have done the scene as not. we all know shia lebouf did his.... and so why not charlotte..?

None of them did their own sex scenes in this movie. Not even Shia.

Not sure what makes you think otherwise (other than wishful thinking)

[pharoahegypt]

you think i have wishes that shia did his???? hell no. but actresses have been known to lie before; as have their press officers.... think before YOU wish the truth away!

[Mr Bond]

Originally Posted by sooperlicious

Sorry, but no cigar. This ain't Charlotte's. A porn double (Elvira Friis) and prosthetic genitals were used in the movie.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_4995662.html

Each time, prod and actors who play nude tell us there's special effect, or porn double. In some movie, the answer is yes. Not in all. Charlotte Gainsbourg is well know in France as a kind of sex addict actresse, a girl who don't want double. ( it's more easy to live with husband with the " official " excuse of double )
Some people who work on that movie tell me it was her each time we see her nude. Its not she on the picture we can see here, with two black men. We don't see that in the movie, it's a special digital effect for picture only.

For example, when I post the pic the 06.19.2016, I just talk with Romain Teller ( ? ), who worked as painter for the studio landlord. He said me what I say. Charlotte pussy, or not ? But, who knows ?

[JohnHolmes]

I still dont get it why someone always comes with CGI in cases like that ... no !!! Body double yes because you can shoot that in 2 or 3 takes and its done, but CGI - geez why would a company be willing to pay digital artists and renderers lots of money for a frame by frame rendered scene when they just have to get a camera and put just some girl in front of it for a fraction of the costs. Nobody would do that.

Yes there are digital altered scenes (penis in "Irreversible" in the rapescene) or Lena Headey´s head on a body that looks nothing like her body because we´ve all seen her body many times over the years but thats not normal bussiness ... Budget is always tight so why use expensive CGI when lots of girls wanna be in movies for free - even if its just her nipple or vagina ...

[Buddha]

In action


Linked Gallery Here

[PoloMintGuy]

Originally Posted by Mr Bond

And here, another Charlotte " eating Terry "... See the watch, etc on the pic, and see the same on the BW up there.

Probably same woman, just none are Charlotte Gainsbourg despite what countless porn sites say.

The woman in the trashcan can be seen frequently in Terry Richardson's photos & was at the time his intern "Alex".

She is mentioned as being the model blowing Terry while he wears a pantomime horse costume () & also the one blowing him while she's in a bin (the above photo) in this article from the Observer here.

"Alex" is most likely Alexandra "Skinny" Bolotow who is listed on Terry Richardson's Wiki as having been his photography assistant (intern) & is now married to him.

The two names are linked further by mention that his wife Alex posed for explicit shots in Terry's book Kibosh, as mentioned in this article, the book where a lot of these photos come from.

Absolutely nowhere (credible) credits the model as being Charlotte Gainsbourg, also given that the trash can photo is from 2004/2005 when Charlotte would have been a 33 year old established actress in a long term relationship with Yvan Attal, the facts just don't add up.

I think the incorrect attribution is purely down to a vague passing resemblance of Alex in some of those shots to a young Charlotte Gainsbourg, plus the fact it's easier for websites to generate some interest claiming the photos are a known actress rather than a lesser known model.

Hope this is of interest!