Why do women do porn?

[sea-man]

Originally Posted by scottx

Also in some ways sex is easier for women, they don't need to be as into it as us guys. Aside from the soreness from the constant pounding, it takes less prep work for females... we guys face it it takes work maintaining an erection and we tend to at the time from a bound with the women we're with. Some women see it as just something else being shoved into them. And even though careers tend to be short for a women in her late teens, 20s. You're getting paid for something some do after a nice dinner.

True, I used visit a wg, she and I knew each other as provider and client for many years. She told me that she had 15 customers a few days ago in one day. But her pussy was not that loose, even for someone of my size. But I have shagged tight women, then became so loose to a point where I could barely feel anything. But I have shagged a "student" learning English and she was loose. Frankly, I have had very few that were generally tight.

[Quackerson]

I certainly would have a harder time understanding why a woman would go into porn these days, what with the market flooded and the pay per scene rates having dropped substantially over the last 20 years.

Now, I could see why a woman would possibly go to work for a discrete, high end escort service these days. Although were I a woman, I'd want to try and set up something like that for myself, rather than give the bulk of my earnings to the service.

[cginok]

Originally Posted by Quackerson

I certainly would have a harder time understanding why a woman would go into porn these days, what with the market flooded and the pay per scene rates having dropped substantially over the last 20 years.

Now, I could see why a woman would possibly go to work for a discrete, high end escort service these days. Although were I a woman, I'd want to try and set up something like that for myself, rather than give the bulk of my earnings to the service.

I remember coming across a "porn star" doing a webcast/podcast, whatever it was, 5 or so years ago. She claimed she made over $100K a year. Now think about it. What are most of them going to do, if not porn? Minimum wage jobs. So it's either work in some office, or sell clothes in a shop, for $20K a year, or do porn for $100K. It's an easy choice, at least at first.

[Quackerson]

Originally Posted by cginok

I remember coming across a "porn star" doing a webcast/podcast, whatever it was, 5 or so years ago. She claimed she made over $100K a year. Now think about it. What are most of them going to do, if not porn? Minimum wage jobs. So it's either work in some office, or sell clothes in a shop, for $20K a year, or do porn for $100K. It's an easy choice, at least at first.

I could see doing a webcast/podcast, in which at least the performer could own the website and thus control all the profits, and also have physical/"creative" control over the sexual activities depicted.

"Porn star" I'd agree is sort of a misused term, and has been for quite some time. To me, a porn star would be someone working in adult films who has become well known to the point where an appreciable segment of the general public knows who they are, or at least the name.

Lisa Ann COULD be considered a current porn star: that's an argument that might have some merit to it in terms of her popularity. Stormy Daniels was never a porn star.

But I can't imagine why a woman would want to go into the adult film industry now, especially since the "industry" has become so fragmented in the wake of the internet yet is still one where even if the stuff filmed that is uploaded to the internet has become far-flung geographically in terms of where it is filmed, it still isn't an ownership industry as far as the performer is concerned regarding the content.

[sea-man]

look at the long list of EEU cuties, doing hardcore - the way it should be for all nude models

http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/t23...an-models.html

[cginok]

Originally Posted by Quackerson

I could see doing a webcast/podcast, in which at least the performer could own the website and thus control all the profits, and also have physical/"creative" control over the sexual activities depicted.

"Porn star" I'd agree is sort of a misused term, and has been for quite some time. To me, a porn star would be someone working in adult films who has become well known to the point where an appreciable segment of the general public knows who they are, or at least the name.

Lisa Ann COULD be considered a current porn star: that's an argument that might have some merit to it in terms of her popularity. Stormy Daniels was never a porn star.

But I can't imagine why a woman would want to go into the adult film industry now, especially since the "industry" has become so fragmented in the wake of the internet yet is still one where even if the stuff filmed that is uploaded to the internet has become far-flung geographically in terms of where it is filmed, it still isn't an ownership industry as far as the performer is concerned regarding the content.

No, no, no. The webcast/podcast was something from like her website. I came across it on some forum. I wanna say it was Julia Bond, or someone from her era. If you could call those one off scenes they do these days "movies," or the people in them "stars." I was only pointing out that a Julia Bond type person is going to make far more doing those scenes, and such, than they'll make doing anything else they could possibly do for employment.

[Quackerson]

Originally Posted by cginok

No, no, no. The webcast/podcast was something from like her website. I came across it on some forum. I wanna say it was Julia Bond, or someone from her era. If you could call those one off scenes they do these days "movies," or the people in them "stars." I was only pointing out that a Julia Bond type person is going to make far more doing those scenes, and such, than they'll make doing anything else they could possibly do for employment.

I mean, in terms of why a woman these days (putting the virus epidemic to one side) would go into porn, perhaps it remains the same as to why a woman would have gone into porn or stripping or prostituting 40 years ago, in terms of the amount of money a pretty girl with a limited amount of education or a limited resume and traditional job experience is able to make in porn/stripping/hooking vs. more traditional work.

[Quackerson]

Originally Posted by cginok

No, no, no. The webcast/podcast was something from like her website. I came across it on some forum. I wanna say it was Julia Bond, or someone from her era. If you could call those one off scenes they do these days "movies," or the people in them "stars." I was only pointing out that a Julia Bond type person is going to make far more doing those scenes, and such, than they'll make doing anything else they could possibly do for employment.

And I get where you're going with that.

For me...I mean, I dunno.

I would agree with some of the other posters that it would seem overly assumptive to presume every single woman who goes into porn (or stripping or prostitution) does so solely or entirely because of the money...or even if that is the case that every woman working in those trades by default hates what she is doing or would rather not be doing it, because there are plenty of women who don't do it.

Likewise, I wouldn't say all these women doing it are psychologically damaged, but obviously it does take a certain psychological makeup for a woman (or a man) to have sex on camera...even if it is just filming it or photographing it strictly for personal, amateur use and not public consumption, although clearly even with that there is a distinction. There's a sort of...I dunno, a fearlessness (to say the least) with people who are able to do it on film or in person for money. To me there is, anyway.

[sea-man]

http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/t22...wank-club.html

Veronica Dol - From glamour to hardcore


post

http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...ostcount=18856

Even though the poster said "from glamour to hardcore".

How was she and the rest of the nude models are supposed to make a living from a few hours
in a studio naked?
So many eastern European, in germany / austria and Japan nude models are on the game.
It has always been that way.
If she does hardcore, then their prostitution rates are significantly more.
In germany / austria and Japan nude ther are places where they can be cream pied if the monger-er
has a STI free certificate.
In the studio who knows what happens??
My fav: sharon louise hall, whose forum thread has been removed had so many
bare back hardcore videos and she admitted meeting one to one.
Stacey Owen used to hook in SW London while posing for magazines.

It is all about fame in prostitution and porn world that leads to more money.
But careers are very short, they eventually get pregnant from a client.


From the FC thread, csb. There was a mid 1980's stunner from the UK. Long red hair and slim. Was working in Chelmsford.
Another one, I cannot remember her name, very popular model was hooking in Brighton.
As I stated before, I used to piss around in my twenties in Spain a lot. I recognised all the top shelfers on the game. Why else did the publisher take a large number of women to his large house to pose naked?
Rates were much higher than back home in the UK (£35 per half hour and £60 per hour).
In Spain, it was £50 per half hour and £100 per hour. But they did a lot of hardcore. So rates went up to £150 per hour. £200 per hour for cum in pussy only if the punter had a local STI free certificate.
One of my 1980-90's fave: nikki kennedy was a hooker when she met her husband. She did hardcore and when the cash flow stopped and she got pregnant from a client he dumped her.

Currently it is so easy to find hardcore porn stars escorting. But at a much higher cost. Some charge £2000 per hour.





Also Ashleigh McKenzie, one of my favs did a h/c fc video. She used to have a bj video from her one to one meetings. . Sadly no more

[Driftwood75]

My opinion piece on this, so don't shoot me as it is just my thoughts and opinions.

This is mostly the glamour models rather than the hardcore models but I feel women get into itfor two things, money and ego. This is not an attack on women, in all fairness any woman that has the confidence to show off her body (skinny, fat, warts and all) to the world should be applauded.

As a teen I never thought much about it, here were these amazing women showing themselves off for me! Even more so with readers wives...those ladies blew my mind. Here are these women who could easily be my neighbour showing me everything! (Serious disconnect between models and amateurs as a teen).

That feeling of being desired and wanted by so many must be quite addictive, throw in the chance of earning some money (or alot of money) it must be a difficult drug to turn away from.

Only Fans has taken it to the next level too, now literally anyone can be online and be suggestive, provocative etc and start earning money, earning money because that person is now desirable to the masses, these people want her and will gush platitudes and money her way.

Who doesn't want that sort of adoration.

Angela White springs to mind with those models that steadily or even overnight that go from glamour posing to hard-core porn, I can only reason that money played a big part and stepping away from it would financially not be a good idea or worse impossible to step away from