[MB solved NNM] Patti Simmons - ID Gourmet model -Jizzed brunette from SILWA mag

[Rubinski]

Originally Posted by effCup

Is this her as Paula? Alas now 3 dead scans.

Yeah, that was one of the sessions I thought was her.
Here's the pix I have from the session.

First the 5 from goriseek1 mirrored



then some more from sources I cannot recall.
Some may be website releases (from Al Gebra?)
Thanks to original poster.
10 scans



And here's 5 off my scanner from that Hustler June 1983.
Not the full layout



The session showed up again in Gentleman's Companion - October 1983
They also called her Paula
Not the full layout, but 4 scans from me

[LowerCrack]

Anyone have a link to the set mentioned in thread one that starts in the van, or the other sets mentioned with this model: Big Apple, Beautiful Lady, and Leggy Darlins? Might be my n00bness but search isn't pulling those up.

[Rubinski]

Originally Posted by LowerCrack

In my opinion: The Chic Magazine February 1979 set is not our model...wrong hair (carpet and drapes), wrong eyes, wrong cheek bones, wrong teeth, and too skinny.

As I said earlier, I'm not on board with this yet.

And we haven't gotten enough feedback on it to settle the issue.

So, I did some more looking and found a couple of photos to compare.
First, from the Chic Feb 1979 layout



And one from the layout linked by LowerCrack above



Eyes, noses, mouths, chins, nipples and areolas all look dam close to me.
Nothing seems to say no.
I was convinced, so I didn't go any further.
Can do more if needed.

I'll post this and hope for a consensus

[LowerCrack]

Originally Posted by Rubinski

Eyes, noses, mouths, chins, nipples and areolas all look dam close to me.
Nothing seems to say no.
I was convinced, so I didn't go any further.
Can do more if needed.

So I did the same thing and there are some major similarities for sure. To me, the eyes are not the same; the Club model has a different eye set, if that makes sense. Look at the different angles and they do not match; that ratio is something that you cannot change without serious eye treatment. The teeth also appear different; the Club model has perfect straight teeth, while our model has some distinct imperfections in the teeth. The nose is also different, with the club model having a more flat nose at the bottom, while our model has more of an upturn.

[effCup]

Mystery has a slightly snubby nose with a rounded tip. More-so in some pics. than others, however.
----
Snubby:
http://www.imagebam.com/image/c722c8185629010
http://img171.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_831lo.jpg
http://img209.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_189lo.jpg
http://img149.imagevenue.com/img.php..._123_258lo.jpg
http://pixhost.to/show/120/46593618_...-part-6-29.jpg
http://www.imagebam.com/image/c722c8185629010
http://pixhost.to/show/732/41990948_p83.jpg
http://img42.imagevenue.com/img.php?..._123_499lo.jpg
http://img222.imagevenue.com/img.php...123_1090lo.jpg

----
Here her nose seems longer (bridge/top) and more pointy (tip). & yes, some of these are from the same set(s) as above).
http://img21.imagevenue.com/img.php?..._123_434lo.jpg
http://pixhost.to/show/120/46593615_...-part-6-28.jpg
http://www.imagebam.com/image/6bb946477933557
http://www.imagebam.com/image/d1b61f477933570
http://www.imagebam.com/image/f6dc91477933541

I think there's a lot similar about the Chic model, but I don't see the same snubby & rounded-tip nose that is visible in some pics. of mystery?

I'm not certain but suspect the Chic model may be someone different? /shrug/ Can leave here for now, though.

Does her "Outlaws Vancouver" singlet imply a Canadian residence? /shrug/

[LowerCrack]

Not sure if this is post-worthy, but I found this lower quality image on a non-VEF site. It appears to be part of the "Teenage-Lovers" set (Outlaw Vancouver shirt/red headband) and flipped, but not included in anything posted that I could find. Kind of sexy too...curious if anyone has other magazines with this full set?

No luck finding any loops or videos, but I'm still searching.

[LowerCrack]

Disclosure: I am not a video editor, but I think the linked collage really illustrates the eyes and eye structure, as well as the ratio. The 4 pictures on the left to me look much different than the 4 pictures on the right. Our model Eve on the left has a dimple in the chin and stronger cheek bones as well versus the Chic model on the right. When I look at these photos, the contrast seems evident that this is not the same woman. What say you all?

Originally Posted by effCup

I think there's a lot similar about the Chic model, but I don't see the same snubby & rounded-tip nose that is visible in some pics. of mystery?

I'm not certain but suspect the Chic model may be someone different? /shrug/ Can leave here for now, though.
/shrug/

If this isn't convincing, I can move on to the areola analysis (and yes I see a difference there too)

[Rubinski]

Thanks for the comparison collage.

Not sure about the eyes. Maybe.
I saw something in other photos that seemed to compare better.

I do see different noses, but like Effie said, within the same photo sessions.
So I'm not sure what to think about that either.
Can't confirm the difference

The chins might be a solid no, if it turns out to be consistent.
I will look it over carefully soon
Might find something to add
Or maybe I will decide to agree that it is not her.
Just not yet.

Sorry if I am being difficult.
This one is a little sticky.

More comments or details would be welcome.

I'll be happy to look at an aereola comparison.

If we decide they are not a match, I will have to wonder, where are the Chic girl's other sessions?
Is the Chic girl a one time wonder?
Seems like she would have been good for a few sessions anyway.
At least another layout from this session in another mag. A Hustler?

Hustler did make her a Hot Letter girl much later. Mid 1985 into 1986
Dear Danielle?
They used photos from that 2-79 session
I could add some scans from that for comparison but they are very small with little detail

[LowerCrack]

Eve = left 4 and Chic = right 4 (or 8 and 8, depending on how you treat boobs)

So I added lots of pictures, cause I like both ladies boobs to be honest. However, Eve's areola are bigger with less definition around the edges. Eve's areola are also slightly higher and centered versus Chic. The other big difference I see is that Eve has zero "puff" in her areola, while Chic does (see the side boobs mostly).

To me these are different boobs.

I also think that the nose is different, to Rubinski's and effCup's points.

Originally Posted by Rubinski

Thanks for the comparison collage.

[SNIP]

I'll be happy to look at an aereola comparison.

If we decide they are not a match, I will have to wonder, where are the Chic girl's other sessions?
Is the Chic girl a one time wonder?
Seems like she would have been good for a few sessions anyway.
At least another layout from this session in another mag. A Hustler?

Hustler did make her a Hot Letter girl much later. Mid 1985 into 1986
Dear Danielle?
They used photos from that 2-79 session
I could add some scans from that for comparison but they are very small with little detail

[LowerCrack]

http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...2&postcount=31



Credit/Thanks to original poster tomesing