Register on the forum now to remove ALL ads + popups + get access to tons of hidden content for members only!
vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum vintage erotica forum
vintage erotica forum

Go Back   Vintage Erotica Forums > Discussion & Talk Forum > Funnies

Follow Vintage Erotica Forum on Twitter
Best Porn Sites Meet Our Girls Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Notices
Funnies Got a joke or something funny that you want to share? Post it here!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-02-2010, 07:05 PM   #1
scoundrel
Moderator
 
scoundrel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: England
Posts: 11,900
Thanks: 100,944
Thanked 124,537 Times in 12,339 Posts
scoundrel 500000+scoundrel 500000+scoundrel 500000+scoundrel 500000+scoundrel 500000+scoundrel 500000+scoundrel 500000+scoundrel 500000+scoundrel 500000+scoundrel 500000+scoundrel 500000+
Default Announcement: Porn cartoons by Tram Pararam

Very Important Notice

This is a quote from wikipedia which usefully summarises the legal position.

Quote:
The legal status of cartoon pornography depicting minors is a unique issue which interacts with internet pornography, obscenity laws, and specific laws against child pornography.
Laws have been enacted to criminalize "obscene images of children, no matter how they are made," for inciting abuse.[1] An argument is the claim that obscene fictional images portray children as sex objects, thereby contributing to child sexual abuse. This argument has been disputed by the claim that there is no scientific basis for that connection,[2] and that restricting sexual expression in drawings or animated games and videos might actually increase the rate of sexual crime by eliminating a harmless outlet for desires that could motivate crime.[3] This is exemplified in a case involving a man, from Virginia who, while arrested after viewing lolicon at a public library, asserted that he had quit collecting real child pornography and switched to lolicon.[4]
Currently, countries that have made it illegal to possess (or create/distribute) sexual images of fictional characters who are described as or appear to be under eighteen years old include Canada, South Africa, Sweden and the Philippines[5]. Legislation to mirror this in the United Kingdom will be in force from the spring of 2010.[6] At the upper edge, this encapsulates pornographic depictions of even seventeen-year olds together, or adults where the predominant impression conveyed is of a person under the age of 18.
So you see, "it's only a cartoon" cuts no ice. The rules of VEF and the law of the land applies. Therefore:

No posts depicting characters under 18 (or even who might be under 18) involved in sexual acts. That would include Bart and Lisa Simpson, the kids from the Incredibles and from Family Guy etc. Let me repeat that. Note that if the character even appears as though he/she might be under 18, that's a no no.

No posts depicting intercourse between people and animals. This includes Daphne or Velma and Scooby Doo. Greek mythology notwithstanding, sex with a winged horse would count as bestiality. Sex between human and aliens (Futurama)/mummies (Lara Croft) is probably OK, I'll let you know if it isn't.

I know this is arbitary. I know it is surreal. But I am explaining now what is allowed and what is not allowed. The onus is on you, if you want to post porn cartoons, to abide by the rules.The onus is on me as your moderator to see to it that the rules are obeyed and to intervene if they are not.

Regards.
Scoundrel.
__________________

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
scoundrel is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 84 Users Say Thank You to scoundrel For This Useful Post:
3827715, AceXX, andergar, andw, arco35, axdx, ballyhoo, Black Rat, blondifan, boka666999, breakermorant, cesium, CHARLOTTE2, cicciobuki, cntrydj, ConstantOgler, DaBear, Darkbloom, deepsepia, dildan, eber0058, Edenbeast, Estreeter, exfarmer, Fabrizio, firo, frakacylon, Glen Quagmire, GlenelG, Gls50ful, grossnex, haVEFun here, henry_fellows, Hertz, hound dog, hugh77, jobrien, john6316, kego29, kelio, kolzig37, loosegoose, Lovegun77, luddite, makem123, Mal Hombre, Mantissa, markyboy70, marlon, marrow, member01, milliem, Miss80sPorn, mr smithers, mrfixit, MrInBetween, mxyptlk, nevermind, NIN, noodlesoup, normansky, onehourplus, Oswald, otterlimits, petfruitcar, purslane, quisestu, reyc, Sam Spade, se7en, SIT, slowdiver, svga, tabler, the flu, tooTiredtoo, trailmaster, trooper123, tsunamiSD, vagodard1973, Watashi, waycha, wrecked9, yes9thstreet


Old 05-31-2017, 09:22 PM   #2
signal
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 56
Thanks: 12,526
Thanked 220 Times in 45 Posts
signal 1000+signal 1000+signal 1000+signal 1000+signal 1000+signal 1000+signal 1000+signal 1000+signal 1000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by scoundrel View Post
Very Important Notice

This is a quote from wikipedia which usefully summarises the legal position.



So you see, "it's only a cartoon" cuts no ice. The rules of VEF and the law of the land applies. Therefore:

No posts depicting characters under 18 (or even who might be under 18) involved in sexual acts. That would include Bart and Lisa Simpson, the kids from the Incredibles and from Family Guy etc. Let me repeat that. Note that if the character even appears as though he/she might be under 18, that's a no no.

No posts depicting intercourse between people and animals. This includes Daphne or Velma and Scooby Doo. Greek mythology notwithstanding, sex with a winged horse would count as bestiality. Sex between human and aliens (Futurama)/mummies (Lara Croft) is probably OK, I'll let you know if it isn't.

I know this is arbitary. I know it is surreal. But I am explaining now what is allowed and what is not allowed. The onus is on you, if you want to post porn cartoons, to abide by the rules.The onus is on me as your moderator to see to it that the rules are obeyed and to intervene if they are not.

Regards.
Scoundrel.
No problem with your rules. However, a legal argument would
be that child pornography laws were enacted to prevent children
from being victimized. Hard to see how Bart Simpson can be
the "victim" in a criminal case.
signal is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to signal For This Useful Post:
Old 06-21-2017, 02:12 AM   #3
dwvbf
Vintage Member
 
dwvbf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 531
Thanks: 5,453
Thanked 5,990 Times in 526 Posts
dwvbf 25000+dwvbf 25000+dwvbf 25000+dwvbf 25000+dwvbf 25000+dwvbf 25000+dwvbf 25000+dwvbf 25000+dwvbf 25000+dwvbf 25000+dwvbf 25000+
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by signal View Post
No problem with your rules. However, a legal argument would
be that child pornography laws were enacted to prevent children
from being victimized. Hard to see how Bart Simpson can be
the "victim" in a criminal case.
Not just the law, but also a matter of taste. This maybe a porn site, but a classy one as one Mod says it in his sig.
dwvbf is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dwvbf For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump




All times are GMT. The time now is 06:37 PM.






vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise v2.6.1 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.