Emma Watson Fake???

[fordprefect739]

This pic isn't really nudity though. It's a bit suggestive but still not nudity.

[leviathan0999]

Originally Posted by JCat

EDIT: I just read a brief article about this. I'm amused by the claim they make:

As if this immediately happened. I'm sure the stylist wasn't thinking of that at the time. The lawyers had to create a story to explain ownership.

Almost any time Emma's made a public appearance in the past couple of years, before the event she's posted pictures to social media of the outfit she's going to wear for it. These pictures are generally taken by her stylist, Sarah Slutsky (c'mon, let's be grown-ups here, okay?,) and no doubt she also takes pictures of outfits that are rejected. Given the date these were taken in 2014, I believe this was a wardrobe test for a royal charity event of some sort held at Windsor castle a day or two thereafter. Pretty clearly, this outfit was rejected for obvious reasons.

As the photographer who took the picture, Ms. Slutsky owned all rights to it. Getting those rights reassigned to Emma was no doubt as simple as a phone call and emailing a PDF form for her to "e-sign" and return. She didn't have to do it in 2014, when the pictures were taken, she could give away those rights at any time. (I believe to sell the rights for publication, she'd have to also have a signed model release from Emma.)

{It's also quite possible that Ms. Slutsky's contract with Emma as her stylist includes a blanket re-assignment of rights to any picture she takes of Emma pursuant to her work to Emma.}

So, in any case, yes, you can be sure that some version of Ms. Slutsky re-assigning the rights to Emma did happen.

[Banpan]

http://vintage-erotica-forum.com/sho...&postcount=918

Originally Posted by jedimasterjeff

I'm guessing not her. The woman in the bath seems a good bit heavier than Emma, has strange tan lines (and a tan in the first place) and those breasts look like they've nursed a child or two. Children's shampoo isn't conclusive, but I'm guessing Emma doesn't use $8 a bottle product.

I think the evidence that it is her, is strong. You can't tell if she's heavier the way she sits in the bathtub, and the freckles match + the necklace pendant match too, so do also one of her bracelet. About the shampoo, why shouldn't she use a cheaper brand? DGJ makes organic products, and at a price at £3,45 ($4,25) for a small bottle (8,5 oz/250 ml) it is not exactly cheap, but kinda mid-range price-wise. Nobody says she has to buy $100 a bottle shampoo just because she's rich.

Emma have tan-lines from time to time, but it looks stupid in a strapless dress, so I guess she uses makeup like everybody else in the business to hide them. Just like she hide those beautiful freckles of hers, which is a shame. The breasts are absolutely perfect, and I doubt any kid has been sucking on them, the only thing is the size of the nipples -- they seems a bit too big for her, but then again, it could be the camera angel.

-- I think it's her.

[Norkles]

The girl in the tub is eerily similar to Emma. I'd put money that it is indeed her in the vid.

[Havinfun]

I think it's her. At first, I wondered why she wouldn't have a fancier tub, but it seems substantial enough.